Fire Snakes

Mark Norfolk's page

Goblin Squad Member. Organized Play Member. 337 posts. 1 review. 1 list. 1 wishlist.



1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cue the wierdness of being resurrected but still having a corpse (maybe a resurrected necromancer can animate his original skeleton)?

and maybe I'm missing something - but wouldn't telport be much easier?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

A filter by sourcebook too, so a GM can limit stuff to the books he owns.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

"But the faithful will be healed with my Cata-tonic!"


5 people marked this as a favorite.

Purely anecdotal of course, but as a retailer I get the impression that most gamers buy the rules for a D&D/Pathfinder/CoC/Shadowrun etc, take it home and have fun with their friends, with no concept of this, or other forums or the perceived inadequacies of their game of choice. They play it as is and have a good time.

Like savages.

I would hypothesis that the 'many gamers' label belongs to this group. Those poor, poor fools.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

The 'desperadoes make off with a super starship' is giving me a 'Blake's Seven' vibe.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I am a 50 year old - and I like it a lot.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Nah. She was a cliché. A trope. The free-wheeling loner kid who says "Hey. It's me. Deal". Same old same old. YMMV of course...


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Leia in the centre...


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Yep. I'm afraid I'm not a fan of fresh faced yoofs driving billion dollar war machines. In PR1 the pilots were grizzled veterans - which seems more appropriate. I must be getting old(they all looked pretty young to me)and cynical (the marketing men have got involved in the script writing stage).

I am a fan of giant robots punching giant monsters in the face - that was the target market for Pacific Rim - so I'm not adverse to childish things....so I'll still go and see it.

Hey - it's just my opinion - and with the trend now for trailers to mislead slightly, the movie may focus on different things...


1 person marked this as a favorite.

We started Kingmaker not long after book 1 was released. Just now getting to the end of book six. So if you can get 'book 7' out by September that would be great :-)

For other information - modules with a level 1 or 2 increase. A good read but easy to run. Interesting background but easy to plug into an existing campaign. Available in print form through normal bricks and mortar shops. I'm sure that doesn't sound too hard to do....

Cheers
Mark


2 people marked this as a favorite.

+1 for high level stuff. And more than four characters. And assuming those are not 15 point buy noobs.

I would ask for sub-system support but the Kingdom rules get too clunky at later levels and I plan to just switch to good old Birthright if my group wants to continue.

Themes - planar travel, space travel, flying ships, artifacts, city destruction, dragons (and another request for kaiju)...

Cheers


1 person marked this as a favorite.

But don't read the spoiler-free review at "ComicBookMovie.com". The review may be spoier free - but comments by the f****wits underneath aren't. :-(

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Rynjin wrote:
Mark Norfolk wrote:
Face the Raven definitely the low point of the series.
Wat

.... it was dull wasn't it. Plus Clara's death was 'flat' without all the normal 'companion is leaving' emotional content, so we knew it wasn't for keeps. People were being irritatingly cryptic 'just because'. Me's plan hinged on Rigsy calling Clara and on other alien refugees not figuring it out and the Doctor not figuring it out and....

...well, I just didn't like it.

Cheers


1 person marked this as a favorite.

That series ended pretty well with two good episodes. Face the Raven definitely the low point of the series. And while I liked one or two episodes from the last series more than some in this one, it was an improvement overall.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Laurefindel wrote:
Werthead wrote:
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
We also see the female pilot Jessika Pava.

Played by Jessica Henwick who was in GAME OF THRONES last year. Unusual for a STAR WARS actor to be playing a character with the same name.

Quote:
Should we guess the plot?

FANFARE

TITLE CRAWL

SPACESHIP FLYING INTO SHOT

STUFF GOING DOWN ON A PLANET (PROBABLY A DESERT ONE)

ACTION STUFF

WOAH LIGHTSABRE/FORCE REVEAL

ESCAPE FROM PLANET

STUFF IN SPACE

CUTAWAYS TO VILLAINOUS PLOTTING

"I've got a bad feeling about this."

EXPOSITION

PLAN ON HOW TO DEAL WITH BAD GUYS

SPACE BATTLE/GROUND BATTLE/BOTH

THREEPIO/ARTOO COMEDY PRATFALLS

BIG EXPLOSION/DEATH OF SECONDARY VILLAIN WHILST PRIMARY VILLAIN SURVIVES FOR SEQUELS

EVERYONE HIGH-FIVES/GIVES MEDALS TO/IMPREGNATES HEROES APART FROM CHEWBACCA, WHO IS IGNORED BECAUSE OF SPACE RACISM.

END CREDITS.

Will the fanfare play now that Disney owns the franchise?

Doesn't 20th Century Fox still own the distribution rights?

Regardless of of what I think of not-so-true-blue Rupe, not having those strient chords at the start seems wrong somehow.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I go for stuff that will enhance the current campaign (specifically Kingmaker ATM) and it does irk me when promised product does get pushed back for more spells and monsters (how long 'til Mythic Muppets ;-) ?).

Spells and Monsters? No, no, no! There are so many of these, just by Paizo and I don't have all their books for those. One caveat (if I may single one out) is the Codex Draconis line. It's a shame they didn't get round to the metallics. Then again I think I have all I need.

If a player want's to take a character in a particular direction and a product covers that then I will take the plunge on that too. Exalted Domains and SGG's witches supplements have proven useful.

A different way of doing a core mechanic, if it appeals draws me in too. More specifically Making Craft Work and Ars Metamagica are staple rules in my campaign. I'm looking forward to someone working on a new approach to flight.

To single out publishers I guess Rogue/Super Genius and Legendary tend to do the sort of thing that appeals (when they get round to doing them ;-)).

Cheers
Mark


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Hama wrote:
Mark Norfolk wrote:

I have only seen two movies in 3d and both were hideous experiences (the Ray Winstone Beowolf and Avatar).

Wow, such an informed opinion. Two whole movies?

Err... of course - that's all it took. Not sure what I'm supposed to do except keep paying a premium to have what is (for me) a ruined time at the cinema.

Other people like it and that's fine. But for me the marginal gain is not worth the added premium. That's all. I did give three reasons why I didn't like it, and one movie was supposed to be THE showcase of 3d movies.

Cheers
Mark


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Great show. I'm going to have to break out the box sets again.

"Not Drazi. Purple!"

"I've have always been here."

"It's like being pecked to death by cats".

"Woo. Hoo?"

"It's like all those full moons sending out bozo-rays."

This little lapse in security isn't going to affect my Christmas bonus is it?"

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

That trailer was just so, so awful. didn't they just take a segment of a Futurama episode and streached out to a movie? It's a 'No' from me.

Cheers
Mark


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Thanks for that reply. I promise to calmly wait at least 6 hours before hassling you for an Ultimate Armies release date!

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'll echo the praise of how patient and, well, nice to us, responding calmly and well mannered to our cries for product yet to reach publication. Many thanks for all your effort on our behalf. and I'm looking forward to that surprise plug-in!

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

This where the DM is going to have to decide a ruling. Bearing in mind the force that would smear you across the ground is now just going to pull your arm out of its socket perhaps a strength test to maintain your grip? Assuming you've got time to draw and activate it....

If you're base-jumping there must be easier ways at the level you get an immovable rod.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Werthead wrote:
Quote:
It's Chris Mortika's fault for mentioning the Valeyard first and therefore bringing up memories the whole sorry mess that is Trial of a Time Lord. Nothing ever good comes of that. :-)
Many WHO fans are still traumatised from that situation. Sometimes saying, "Carrot juice!" to the wrong person can send them into a foaming rage.

Especially Bonnie Langford and Colin Baker!

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

@Lord Snow
We'll just have to agree to disagree about certain things. For what it's worth 10 is my favourite modern Doctor and I was pleased to see him back. I'm only now starting to like the Smith era (still some disappointing episodes though) although that's more to do with the stories rather than the character.

We all care about the character. If we didn't we wouldn't be here writing to strangers about it failing to change the other's point of view.....

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lord Snow wrote:

Watched first 30 minutes... and I am not sure I can find it within myself to watch the rest.

What I was most excited about for this episode was the return of 10. I never watched the old show, but from the 3 newest doctors, he was by far my favorite.

What I got was NOTHING like 10. The peace loving adventurer of endless wonder was turned into a matt smith clone.

Compare 10's reaction when he meets his "future self" in "The Next Doctor" - that dazzling smile, thinking the man was brilliant for constructing a makeshift "TARDIS"... There was a very real and powerful feeling of wonder.

And now? he meets his new self an immediately becomes competitive. Because if Mofat can have a word on the subject, the Doctor is kind of a jerk. Also a womanizer, apparently. The man who loved Rose, and who couldn't find love for Martha, and who always treated his companions as fellow adventurers, is now rescuing such a stupid version of the queen of England that had the historical figure resembled the one in the show even a little bit, surely that country would have collapsed. Instead of having fun and rescuing humans, 10 is now a selfish, annoying man with a superiority complex.

If it would have been the Tennanet of season 4, he wouldn't have GONE ON A FREAKING DATE with an evil shapeshifter, he would have tried to find out what the shape shifter did to the queen*. Had he been the Doctor he was 3 seasons ago, he wouldn't have blurted his list of titles (NONE of which the original 10 was proud of) at fluffy wood animals.

It was frankly plain and simple awful for me to watch. I think the last vastige of hope I had for the show is gone, and I will probably wait out the rest of the Mofat era. It's just too much for me to take.

* I know, the shape shifter was the horse, but the Doctor didn't know it at the time.

He was very much like 10. It was David Tennant. Scripts don't give direction or acting instructions. That's up to the actor. And even if you mean dialogue alone he wasn't a Matt Smith clone. Number 10 was quite happy to announce his genius and Time Lord credentials - particularly when he was companionless - as his tenure went on. Voyage of the Damned, Midnight and Waters of Mars spring to mind straight away.

As for The Next Doctor's TARDIS, well he'd twigged by then that he was really Jackson Lake and was marvelling at human endeavour.

Competitive Doctoring is a tradition. Just because you choose to ignore or avoid the early episodes doesn't lessen their influence on current shows. It's part of the heritage and expected by the fans - and that's who anniversary shows are for. The references to The Three Doctors was a hint that we should take this adventure with a pinch of salt.

The so-called womanizing? Well 10 got in a lot of kissing for a chaste Time Lord, so it was more of an in-joke. Plus going on a date to draw out a Zygon commander (or find where the real Queen was) fits his brief. And it squared the circle for The Shakespeare Code.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:
Vic Wertz wrote:
LazarX wrote:
The Master in Tremas' body was incinerated in the Flames of Sarn. He got better.

Good point... but he also came back in the same body. That doesn't mean it *wasn't* a regeneration, but it also doesn't make it obvious that it was.

The Master, unlike the Doctor has perfect control over his regenerations, so he kept comeing back in the same body at least in the early years or when he deliberately decided to change such as when he took on the Professor and Saxon forms.

No he doesn't! We've only seen the Master regenerate once - Derek Jacobi into John Simms. After Roger Delgado we saw Peter Pratt and Geoffrey Beavers - both the emaciated, decaying Master. Antony Ainley's version was the stolen body of Tremas (a Trakenite, not a Time Lord). There is absolutely no indication that the Master had an off screen death and regenerated into an exact duplicate of himself. What the Master seems very good at is extending his life by means other than regeneration.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Less teases; Ultimate War, please.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I guess while your character sheet says "neutral wizard" you are, in fact, an evil wizard as you are stealing money from other people and hoping to blame other kingdoms for it.

I'm not saying it's a bad idea. Just don't have any illusions about your place in the morality pop charts.

Others have already said that running a thieves guild is not free money - your basically running a large, complicated business. As a DM I'd be happy for this to happen and for you to have your fun in the sun....whilst considering the law enforcement and investigative capabilities of your intended target settlements (probably factoring the various settlement stats and the highest divination spells available to the town).

Eventually you'll be rumbled, or 'encouraged to step down', so have an exit strategy from the get go.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Orthos wrote:
I would certainly personally prefer 9+Rose and 10+Donna alongside 11+whichever incarnation of Oswin if given the option, as I'd kill to have Donna back in the show even for just one episode, Eccleston would be cool as hell to see return, and pairing 10 with Martha will just lead to more post-Rose angst.

Agreed!

Cheers
Mark


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I don't think it's so much the 'mechanical' consequences but the fact that the 'narrative' consequences are that $#!t happens to his PC. All the time.

If there are ways out then there need to be clues that lead to that option. It shouldn't be hidden.

Look, you need to talk to your players to see if they're enjoying your campaign and not to us. Our opinions don't really matter and you can't use them to somehow justify your gaming approach if your players don't like it. You can't say "Suck it up!" because the Paizo forum said they like your game style.

Come back and let us know how it went...

Cheers
Mark


2 people marked this as a favorite.

whether or not some of us like this game is of no consequence..it's the Paladin's player who matters....and he's not having fun.

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Well, I just had an APL 7 party slay a young adult green. They also had luck and Plot Twist cards on their side. Still....

0. A dragon should always be an 'Epic' encounter.
1. Assume the dragon knows where the party are.
2. Before really engaging the group, fly over ahead at the maximum height that still allows it's frightful presence to thin the herd...
3. All spells of a lengthy duration are cast in advance (like shield)
4. Use entangle before combat to tie the top DPR in place
5. Flyby Attack with the breath weapon on different targets each round.
6. Once they're down on hp pick on a PC and attack him in melee.

From a story point of view of course, you want the party to be scared s***less, but win (or flee). A difficult thing to judge. You don't want to look like you engineered a TPK....

Cheers
Mark


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kthulhu wrote:
DeathQuaker wrote:
And the show forced me to take back my "oh no Daleks" whining earlier--they actually made that episode good. Now if we can be without them for a little while still, though....
In my opinon, Asylum is the best Dalek story of nuWho yet.

I think that the Moffat/Smith era has finally found it's stride...

Cheers
Mark


5 people marked this as a favorite.

With all the talk of Interplanetry Teleport on another thread a planet hopping AP appeals at present.

Also: an urban based AP where the group become movers and shakers in a single city (guild leaders; head priests; watch captains etc).

Cheers
Mark