![]() ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Finoan wrote:
Except Bravery. And Battlefield Surveyor. And accelerated damage boosts from weapon spec. And action compression from extremely powerful and highly unique class feats. And the ability to swap those feats on-the-fly in "Flexibility" slots. But do go on about how the fighter doesn't offer anything unique. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Mark Moreland wrote:
Take a page from the console game industry and package a one time use code with your physical books. First person to buy the book can use the code to download the PDF from the shop for free. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Xenocrat wrote: You probably want one two action blast and one single blast rather than three anyway. Speaking from experience at the table, this is definitely true. the extra +4 to damage on the first blast far outweighs the -8 third attack, and if you include backswing on the first blast (if you didn't need to channel), your second attack is effectively -3 if you missed on that first. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() aobst128 wrote:
Just extremely precise control. For tremors, the earth just happens to level-out as the ally takes each step, or the wood tumbles in just such a way as to roll *over* or *around* the ally in motion. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() They're a spellcaster that "plays like" a martial. Just like the fighter has feats to give them action options, the kin does as well - the kins are just more magical in affect (healing, using sand to grapple instead of athletics, etc). I'd argue the magus is a martial that "plays like" a spellcaster too (spell selection etc). ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Verzen wrote:
I honestly can't envision a scenario where metal isn't given some way to get heavy armor proficiency or an equivalent. Wrapping yourself in metal armor is one of the first thoughts anyone could have. It's impossible the design team missed such a thing. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Sanityfaerie wrote:
100% I think you're correct here that they'll have a solid answer built in, we just disagree in our speculation on how it gets solved. My suspicion is the "fix" Paizo designs in for single-focus-fire kineticists will be "remove fire immunity/reduce fire resistance" rather than just switching damage types. We've already seen one element of it in the spoiled aura upgrade. It'll be more in-theme for that element and allow a real pyromancer "BURN IT HARD" feel. Unfortunately I suspect the immunity removal to also be high level, which still leaves a problem until it becomes available. All speculation of course. ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Red Griffyn wrote:
This feels like a pretty doom-and-gloom view considering the 1e version AND the 2e playtest were d8 HD AND the playtest got light armor mastery. The class is going to have the highest con available so is roughly equivalent to a minimum of a beefy d10 class before you put any significant effort at all into it. Will be happy to be generous in sharing class details when my PDF arrives :D ![]()
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
![]() Are there any adventures recommended to be played before participating in the Gencon 2023 special event 04-99? I've got a group that's new-ish to PFS2e but not new to org play in general. We're trying to arrange our Gencon 2023 module schedule to maximize our experience. |