If I have 2 Vestigial Arms, then take Aspect of the Beast for the claws on the Vestigial Arms, do I get extra attacks with those claws?

Are the Monk's unarmed strikes treated as manufactured weapons for the purpose of the Paladin's Divine Bond?

Ok, let's say it's the second round of combat, the Sniper sneaks around in the bushes. The enemy is no longer flat-footed, the battle has begun. The enemy doesn't notice the sniper, sniper hits! My question is, does the enemy avoid the sneak attack damage, because he is no longer flat-footed, or does the sniper get the sneak attack damage because he was sneaking and remained unnoticed by the enemy?

When I attained a high enough level, I'm going to take Channel Smite, then take Alignment Channel, Evil Outsider, in order to harm Evil Outsiders with my attack. Can these abilities all be combined into one attack? I realize that to use the Paladin's original Smite is a swift action, while the Channel Smite is also a swift action. However I should be able to Smite one turn then Channel Smite on the next turn for massive damage, since the Paladin's Smite continues till the opponent is slain. Also thinking of taking Improved Channel and Extra Lay On Hands. So what does everyone think? Can these Feats all be combined into one badass Outsider-Slaying Paladin, or am I hoping for too much here? ;)

I took the raven familiar at first level, we can both speak the same language. I like to have my bird go out and seek things, monsters mostly, it has a higher perception than me and spots things easier. My GM says that's b!~*!*+% and that I shouldn't even be able to talk to it, even though it is a magical beast and has an INT score of 6 (which isn't that high but it's better than the usual score of INT 2 for most animals). So what do you guys think, can I speak to my bird intelligently? And if so, is it legitimate to have it seek out dangerous creatures for me?

Just wondering if alchemist extracts stack like spells do.

Just wondering if the arcane strike feat stacks with a MWK weapons enhancement bonus.

I'm under the impression that I can make 2 attcks with my unarmed strike as a full round action at my full BAB. If this is true, then what is the point of a flurry of blows, which is at a -1 for both attacks?

Was playing the other day when we encountered some flying enemies. I wanted to do a fireball on one of them. My GM said go ahead, but I said it would make more sense if I had to make a ranged touch attack against them since they were flying. What do you all think? Ranged touch attack or automatic hit vs. flying enemies with fireball?

Okay so I was playing a game the other day when someone busted out a Wand of Cure Moderate Wounds. He thought he could use it as a ranged spell, however Cure Moderate Wounds is a touch spell. Everyone at the table said he could use it without making a touch, but that seems a little ridiculous to me. The wands description in the Core doesnt say much on the subject, and doesnt say the range on the spell, even if it is a touch. My friends assumed you could just use the wand at any range, as long as you could see the person your healing, but that seems a little overpowered to me. I was saying that the wand mimics the spell exactly, so you would have to touch someone with wand, since CMW is a touch spell. Yes this is a noob question but i would very much appreciate if someone could answer it for me. Thanks!