![]() ![]()
![]() Joshua J. Frost wrote:
The best way would prolly be to reach up to where your Publisher made an Unnecessary and unprofessional comment and snip that post as well as all that followed it OFF the board and only have a few people exposed to it.. then let the conversation continue along, blissfully unaware that it was ever derailed ![]()
![]() Guy Humual wrote:
Oh your cute.. very funny.. BRAVO Mr. Comedian. "We're allowed to make vague general complaints, be as rude or as snippy as we want, threaten boycotts" - We ARE actually.. allowed to do just that. "Publishers should read every single suggestions on these boards and respond to them completely individually" - OR they should only read them.. perhaps even completely ignoring the 19th incarnation of a subject or thread, and only comment when they have something CONSTRUCTIVE to add. " and maintain a certain level of professionally." - OR perhaps Professionalism but otherwise QFT ![]()
![]() Watcher wrote:
Well I took Seekeroflights' reply to be dismissive of my feelings and point of view, therefore I fired back at HIM. I have little issue with Watcher or Daigle.. except to say that I disagree with anyone who states I have a thin skin and haven't been around long enough to know what was meant.. You see the point is it doesn't matter what was meant, it doesn't matter of Merickdale and the publisher are BBQ buddies that chit chat every night on the phone and banter endlessly. As a representaive of Paizo. all his responses should be as Neutral and inoffensive as possible. You wanna trade flame blows with an internet bully? Make a different name to post with. He abused his position by using it to belittle and mock someone else in a public forum. If ANYONE could have found his response curt, dismissive or condescending... he shouldn't have made it.. period. At least not as Mr. Publisher, representative of Paizo. He has definitely sullied the companies fun and friendly gamer persona by showing his ass.
And it made ME feel like he was dismissive of a customers opinion.
![]()
![]() seekerofshadowlight wrote:
And most of those 10 post are HERE in THIS thread.. I am a Lurker, one of the Thousands of gamers who Read and Watch.. but don't bother to post. His reply Offended ME I don't care WHO he was talking to. It comes of as condescending.. to ME Period... The End.I am sure I am not the only person with 10 or less or No posts that could have been offended by the publisher responding to a customer in such a way. The nameless readers WAY out number the frequent posters and if his company relied on just the "Forum Elite" to survive.. IT WOULD NOT. So thanks for YOUR condescending attitude.. but you can keep it. I still say he should not have made that Post,it was in bad taste and showed poor judgment at best... callous disregard for his customers at worst. ![]()
![]() Adam Daigle wrote:
Wow.. the defense of the publisher is awesome .. apparently the "Forum Elite" kowtow to and revere anyone with a Paizo Title here. They are Gods. They can Do No Wrong.Except regardless of how many times threads have been made and how many times its been discussed.. his response as a representative of Paizo is still out of line, inappropriate and condescending. ![]()
![]() Watcher wrote:
That's great, so he shook your hand and now he can be an ass on the boards just because he eye-rolled when he saw yet another thread about his Class name. He should have kept his eye-rolling and his typed response to himself. He added nothing constructive and was merely rubbing it in that there was actually nothing anyone could do or say about the matter.. he wins.. True enough.. but no way to talk to people who you want to pay your mortgage. ![]()
![]() Erik Mona wrote:
This response from the publisher btw is kinda prickish and mean-spirited.. if that's the way they are going to talk to us then I think we should not support their company. It just really rubs me the wrong way that the publisher would respond in such a fashion.. the "No." from him earlier was more than sufficient and should have been the last thing he added. As customers and players we then have the right to discuss and criticize their decisions and should not have to take derisive replies from the people we support with our $s. ![]()
![]() stuart haffenden wrote:
I'd love a copy of each: Ooo I see links THX!! |