Mark Moreland wrote: Let's not accuse other posters of being sock puppets, please. Just because someone is new to the paizo.com community and has a specific interest in Pathfinder Online doesn't make them any less valuable a member of the community than anyone else. Until Goblinworks has their own messageboards and no longer needs to use paizo.com for discussion of their game, I think there will be a lot of folks who are here simply for that and not for the Pathfinder RPG or other elements that might draw a majority of our posters to the site. Sincere apologies -- I have deleted the potentially offending post.
Grats on the funding! ... but doesn't the Kickstarter project have a Heisenberg or false analogy problem associated with it? E.g., I'm not really interested in the MMO, but I would like to get the Thornkeep book -- so if I pledge funding to get the book, it will be communicated to Angels/VC's as interest in the MMO?
There is nothing that WotC can do to regain my trust or business. Hasbro/WotC underestimated the effect that an alienated segment of their fan base would have. They guessed wrong. I, for one, hope that they have to live with the consequences for some time ... (all the way to the bank)^-1. Paizo didn't treat their customers as fungible revenue units. Loyalty and integrity count.
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Suffering succotash ... you beat me to the clever Grodd reference!
Alexander Kilcoyne wrote: Unaware is not the same as helpless. If the target was sleeping, you could use a coup de grace action to effectively cut his throat though, forcing a fortitude save or die. I agree with Alexander and would add that if the target successfully saved, it should probably be helpless for the next attack in the same round. |