![]() ![]()
![]() jreyst wrote:
This is good, but the vision is slightly off So here is the real deal at what is going to be annouced at Gen Con I see a new super AP coming out...in the future. It gets foggy here...an AP called Dungeonmaker.
So you can set out as heroes but you end up as important parts of the Dungeon. Possible endgame roles for the AP are: Stoic Dwarf Something = Reinforced (but Ruined) Door -roll to open
Yes, this is what I see....outlook good for Gen Con I could be wrong though. Personally I would prefer a module based off of Glengarry Glen Ross ("Oh Yeah. I used to be an Adventurer....It's a tough racket"), but I think I may have to write that one myself. ![]()
![]() Devil's Advocate wrote:
I should have seen this coming..... ![]()
![]() Dire Mongoose wrote: Anyway, I never said a wizard could beat your messageboard! I said a balanced team of arcane and divine full casters could beat your group of messageboards! :P With optimized or non-optimized posts? One of the other issues I am seeing here is the heavy use of posts from non-optimized posters. I know it's a mechanical problem that no one wants to talk about - we all know it's there though. Yeah I know, you may enjoy reading all the various posts or even just posting simple responses yourself, but the reality doesn't change the fact that you're still doing it wrong. So non-optimized posters try to get their message out and it takes what - several posts to pull it off? They create aliases which are in effect just a post-tax, while optimized posters can get their point out in one post, maybe two if the board makes it save.
![]()
![]() Conspiracy Buff wrote:
You had me until you mentioned the Golden Girls. I could believe that they'd want to watch episodes of "Matlock" or maybe even "Murder She Wrote", but the TTNR's wanting to watch the "Golden Girls"? HAHAHA
I should have seen this coming |