In the Ultimate Equipment guide you have a description for STONEPLATE but it isn't listed in the ARMOR AND SHIELDS chart above Armor <== here Also while browsing in the Ultimate Equipment pages on the left side navigation table where the various books are listed there is a link at the bottom that should take you to the Ultimate Equipment guide for purchase but takes you instead to the Ultimate Combat guide instead. It says specifically "Purchase the Pathfinder Core Rulebook or Ultimate Equipment."
To find it you actually have to select one of the sub categories/chapters inside the Ultimate Equipment guide listing.
I probbaly already know the answer to this but to to be absolutely clear (& pedantic) does the *story feat* count against your total number of feats alloted to one character? It is not a free/extra feat? As listed in the story feats section of the Ultimate Campaign rulesbook (2nd paragraph 4th sentence):
Though one could argue that it is redundant, since it is already a feat, I would almost like the word *instead* included at the end of that fragment. Or something that describes that it _does_ count against your total limit of feats.
Kolokotroni wrote: The major difference is the elven curveblade can be finessed, the nodachi cannot. Doh didn't see that =+) I was mostly basing it on it on the damage vs critcal stuff because it takes a proficiency to gain Dwarven Axes and bastard sword even two handed can only go from 19-20x2 critical I would say setting a sword for charge and gaining en xtra damage type be considred for exotic training but the finesse thing DOES make a really big difference...I will go with that I "sit" sufficiently corrected
The Elven Curved Blade is considered an Exotic Weapon in the Pathfinder Core Rulebook with the following stats (page 143)
In the Ultimate Core Rulebook there is a non Exotic Weapon called the Nodachi with the following stats (Page 131)
A) I really think it should be designated as an exotic weapon
Liquidsabre wrote:
Devils' advocate time: With a higher level group say around 16th levelWell how about a fighter a cleric and a rogue and a sorcerer Cleric casts shield other at 130 feet (with Metamagic Enlarge) on the fighter =>the rogue uses Use Magic Device with a scroll (Metmagic Enlarge: scribed by cleric) and casts it on the Cleric and the sorcerer doing the same who has a Shield Guardian (specialty golem pg. 158 Pathfinder Bestiary) which casts the same within 100 feet and defending the sorcerer (don't forget most AE spells are subject to Spell Resistance which means the golem is most likely immune to those). Truth is my level 16 Fighter had headband of intellect with the Use magic Device skill on it and we had two fighters in the group for a large party. This biggest arguments against this which was "if it's good for the goose it's good for the gander".... We elected to disallow chaining like that since the DM would then present us with a host of 10000 hp mobs ;)
Scenario 1
Paladin(50%) <<Cleric A(25%)<<Cleric B(12.5%)<<Cleric C(6.25%) In the description of the spell it specifically says hit point damage so whatever damage is take by the paladin half of it gets transfereed to cleric A and half of that hit point damage gets transfered to cleric B and so on. As well during combat the clerics heal each other to keep themselves from dying especially cleric A who is taking the brunt of the damage even though it is only 25% of the damage. Scenario 2
Does anyone think the spell needs some revising? Aside: In scenario 2 I don't think the deflection bonus would stack
|