Ixal's page

800 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS

1 to 50 of 800 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Cori Marie wrote:
But again, that doesn't help matters when it happens at 5:30 PM on a Friday night and won't get removed until Monday morning. Unless you don't think moderators deserve to have days off?

And does attacking other posters make the mods wake up earlier so that they can remove the post sooner? No.


Xenocrat wrote:


Not very many, you just obliterate one smallish state at a time until the others start surrendering. With Belgium and Denmark gone, do France, Germany, and the UK offer up their cities to be next? Why?

Defensive weapons in a gravity well may be able to defend against some incoming weapons, but they have a huge disadvantage in trying to hit anything in orbit that can see them and run away with a huge delta v head start.

In any case, technological superiority is a thing in Starfinder, the Vesk and Azlanti have it over the planets they've conquered, a single ship in an AP had it over the entire Pact Worlds.

For the same reason WW2 terrorbombing did not cause people to surrender. Not to mention that China, Russia or the USA would not care much about Belgium.

And defensive weapons do not have much of a disadvantage as they do not even need to reach orbit but just have to cross the flight path of the ships. They are also as good as undetectable until they are launched unlike the ships which can be seen all the time. Especially a low orbit would be very deadly for the attacker while a high orbit gives plenty of time to intercept incoming nukes. Running away from incoming missiles is also very hard when you are in an orbit.
And when you apply it to Starfinder it is even less of a disadvantage. Anti Gravity exist, so gravity wells mean nothing. And when you have a energy weapons which can shoot down you can install the same energy weapon on the planet and shoot up. And then make it 5 times larger and add a couple of dozen more.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Seems like Galactic Magic will have a similar chapter as A Galaxy of Tech (The Magical Galaxy)


Xenocrat wrote:


You don't need to nuke an entire planet, just key population/industrial centers.

In any case, the benefit is having a planet that you can found a new colony on with your own people. There are Starfinder examples of terraforming projects in uninhabitable hell hole planets expected to not pay off for decades. If you can terraform those, you can more easily clean up a planet with some light nuclear winter but a functioning atmosphere and ecosystem.

I don't think "light nuclear winter" would be enough. How many key population/industrial centers does earth have which you need to nuke? In addition to any defensive weapons/missile silos which threatens your fleet?


The main reason why people would visit Eox would probably be its lax laws and the ability to engage in certain vice without reprecussion (at least regarding the law).

Castrovel might be the prime destination for people from inhospitable planets to experience nature. Sure, many planets have nature but Castrovel advertises with it, so when you have the choice of planets with biospheres and travel time being equal many would probably choose Castrovel.
On the other hand, in a more functional economy system, a vacation on Castrovel would likely be rather expensive as to protect environment they likely limit the number of tourists and also have strict laws about how to interact with nature (See dead suns). For people on a smaller budget and who want a more hands on experience with nature Triaxus would probably a better alternative (or even Verces).

I don't think that many people from planets with biospheres will visit other planets just for nature because of the time required for interplanetary travel unless prestige is involved. Even then I don't think this tourist segment would be very large.


I hope this book will have a section about background information like Tech Revolution had and talk about how/if magic is used on a industrial scale, how common spellcaster are in Starfinder and how spellcasting is learned.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
MurderHobo#6226 wrote:


Dragonlance and Greyhawk both had "destroy the current setting" events, too, IIRC.

I'll do what I always do: take the stuff I like, ignore the stuff I don't, add stuff of my own to flesh out the former. Canon at your table is whatever you decide it is.

And, hey: maybe they'll use this to finally fix starship combat? I can dream...

Not sure about Greyhawk but Dragonlance's Age of Mortals was not received well either.

The drift is one part of what makes Starfinder unique and removing it now would only dilute the setting.
Does it prevent some stories to be told? Yes. But it also enables others which would be impossible with traditional FTL.

Instead of removing what makes Starfinder unique Paizo should instead improve the internal consistency of the setting to make better use of its unique aspects.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Xenocrat wrote:

Planetary invasions are easy as long as you have enough nukes. Offer the natives the opportunity to willingly follow and enforce your laws, scrub them and repopulate if they decline. The Idari wanted the planet, not the inhabitants, after all. Their existence was an unfortunate and unforseen complication that could have been resolved from orbit, theoretically.

It surely has to be cheaper to bombard the population away and then fix any environmental effects than to invade with an army and take every city with house to house fighting. I gather the Azlanti run a mixed strategy, some of each. It's also probably cheaper than terraforming a lot of marginal planets, just do pest control on one that is already good enough.

Massed nuclear bombardment has the problem of heavily damaging the ecosphere. At one point you have to ask yourself what your goal actually is.

Also, the orbit is far less safe for the attacker than how it is usually portrayed in SciFi. The attack of Klendathu in Starship Troopers is a good guideline how just getting into orbit and landing troops on the ground will turn out when the enemy is equally advanced as you are.


Sputt wrote:

If you cherry pick the handwavey "space magic!" that fits your point, but choose to ignore what doesn't - then yeah, it's easy to make an argument for absolutely anything and everything in the system.

Sending a message isn't comparable with sending images, especially when we're talking billions of images.

Magical telepathic messages are quite limited in the setting, too. About 10 words per six seconds (or 20, if you include the reply as being made in the same time frame), if you can see the target.

Over large distances there's going to be more issues. Laser communication in space is going to have tons of issues, not least among them piracy and the risk of something just plain blocking. Over long distance the redundancies and security needed would increase transfer time exponentially with distance. Relay satellites could alleviate some of that, but traffic on them would likely be prohibitively expensive for large data transfers (just like buying bandwidth irl is absurdly expensive).

Still looking pretty decent to hire a crew to take a storage device from planet to planet. For low data messages? Nah. For media? Certainly.

Anything short of magically teleporting the storage device from one spot to another, seems unlikely to be as fast as hauling the thing there physically.

Actually sending a message and sending images is exactly the same. Its just data. Only the volume differs.

And that sending messages intra system works in 1d6-1 hours and breaks the laws of physics is stated in the core book exactly that way (using the drift, so no issue with something blocking the path).
Laser I brought up because its a technology which is already implemented in the real world so no "science fiction handwaving".
And with 200+ years of intra system cooperation why would bandwidth be limited and expensive instead of there being dozens of laser relay satellites from corporations and governments in both the orbits of the individual planets and Lagrange points?

And if you have such sensitive data to be worried about interception then you just teleport the storage device instead of putting it on a ship.


Sputt wrote:


There's a new movie out, and it's in a 3d format. You want to transmit it to the next planet over. Distance and transmission speed isn't something you can change without handwavey "space magic!".

You already have space magic as according to the core book messages take 1d6-1 hours intra-system, specifically breaking the laws of physics. So the only question is bandwidth.

And if you do not want to use space magic, there are always technological means to ensure large scale communication between planets like laser communication between relay satellites in orbit of the individual planets.


Planetary invasion is always a problematic topic as it gets used a lot but would hardly ever work when you think about it.
The Idari has already been mentioned, but the same would apply to the Vesk trying to invade Triaxus or the Attack of the Swarm AP.


Franz Lunzer wrote:


WotR: I haven't made it that far in the game, a small bug is grinding my progress to a halt right now. Maybe a spoiler there?

Spoiler:

As Azata you get a 5 year old havoc dragon companion. While of course in the game mechanic she is treated as a companion you can order around she considers you "her bestest friend"


Franz Lunzer wrote:


Sure, I used that word for a reason.

Because even in the Temeraire books, most of the other dragons aren't treated as equals. Temeraire has to fight for them to be treated better.
In Avatar, the wild 'dragons' and 'horses' have to be domesticated by bonding with them. I don't know if they are treated as buddies, or more like horses or pets. Yeah Jake treats Last Shadow well, but that's the departure from the norm, as far as I remember.

That is very different from the Golarion I know.
I don't know if Golarion has any examples of dragons being in such a relationship with a humanoid. Maybe in the Dragon Empires?
I do think the other way around is canon, with a dragon 'herding' or nuturing humanoids.

One ongoing theme in Temeraire is that

Spoiler:
societies which treats dragons as equal perform better than how they historically did.

Also, Aivu from the recent Wrath of the Righteous game, although she of course is hardly a role model for a general dragon raising AP. But it shows how a raising dragon theme can work without a master/servant kind of relationship.


The G&G weapons look quite steampunk to me. They are certainly not historical.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Ella_Shachar wrote:


I think the comparisons to holy water are in bad faith. The problem isn’t that tefillin are in the game--it’s that one of the three major pieces of ritual apparel for Jews (the others being the kippah and the tallit) is portrayed as a marker of pure evil. Maybe 99% of players don’t know what “phylactery” means. It’s not even a term Jews usually use for tefillin, although it may have been when Gary Gygax learned it, since he grew up during the days of abandoning Hebrew terms and adopting English ones in an attempt to appear less scary and foreign to gentiles. But when players look it up, the first thing they’re going to see is that phylacteries are something Jews wear.

So when Jews don't usually use it and the name not coming from Jews/Hebrew but from a general term from the Greek, why is it a Jewish term? Just because you have been told by others that it is and you have to feel offended by it?


2 people marked this as a favorite.
MaxAstro wrote:

I don't think it's a bad thing that Good gods are held to higher standards than Evil ones, nor do I think we should expect symmetry there - it's the nature of good and evil. It's hard to be good and easy to be evil.

If someone spends their whole life as an upstanding citizen, donates to charity, does volunteer work, etc, and then one time murders a person in cold blood, we don't characterize them as "mostly good".

I would also like to restate that for a deity especially there's a big difference between their actions and their tenets. I think you could have a Good deity who personally mistrusts dwarves, but not one who extolls their followers to hate dwarves. The difficult part, of course, is that this is a god and a religion we are talking about, so it can be very hard to separate a deity's character from their tenets - after all, aren't the followers of a god typically going to try to emulate that god to some degree?

Yet when you subscribe to alignment as objective forces then staying evil would require as much dedication to the force of evil than staying good would.


6 people marked this as a favorite.
mikeawmids wrote:
Ixal wrote:
The Raven Black wrote:
AoE's system for loot is extremely problematic as written. You basically steal their whole wealth from anybody you want as long as you consider them guilty of offenses, even if you framed them yourself. It encourages PCs to play crooked cops, since honest ones will actually lose on wealth and equipment.
Thats the whole problem. While advertised as a cop AP you are not playing cops, you are playing adventurers. Still charging in with greataxes and flinging fireballs and still looting your victims.

As written, sure - but it would not take too much to change that. Converting from d20 system to something with a more narrative/story focus, this becomes less of a problem for me and my table specifically, as party power/competency isn't dependent on acquiring x amount of treasure and magic items.

EDIT: Also, if they do veer into bent cop territory, I get to introduce a new NPC from Internal Affairs who starts asking questions and making life difficult, which would gel nicely with the events of book 5.

IMO, I don't think every group of players will notice or care about the arguaby icky connotations of fantasy policeman looting the fantasy bank robber they just immolated with fantasy magic fire. It's a cool theme, players get to lean into broad cop genre stereotypes and have fun bashing malcontents with a truncheon. I game to get away from all the horse manure of daily life/politics, I don't need Paizo to painstakingly recreate the same environment in my fantasy game world and will just change anything that really irks me.

But hey, that's just me.

Getting back on topic, tis truly a glorious time to be converting Pathfinder 2 adventures to a system that isn't Pathfinder 2!

Sure I can rewrite AoE to require the players to think about how much force is appropriate instead of giving them a blanc cheque by making everything nonlethal, have them not loot enemies and instead rely on issued equipment and their pay, add NPCs and checks in case they try to swipe things anyway and introduce more cop dilemas.

I can also rewrite large parts of Fly Free or Die to make the space trucker/trader PCs to actually earn money through trading instead of a nearly useless pseudo currency.
But when I have to rewrite so much to make the gameplay fit the theme, why do I need to buy the AP in the first place instead of just reading the summary on the product page and come up with my own stuff?


I wonder what sports a Golarion Olympics would have and who would participate.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Once they get to the other planets I wonder if Dragonkin will be playable like in Starfinder.

Although in SF genetic engineering is used as explanation why Dragonkin are shrunken to be just large (a requirement for PC adventuring) it is highly questionable.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
The Raven Black wrote:
AoE's system for loot is extremely problematic as written. You basically steal their whole wealth from anybody you want as long as you consider them guilty of offenses, even if you framed them yourself. It encourages PCs to play crooked cops, since honest ones will actually lose on wealth and equipment.

Thats the whole problem. While advertised as a cop AP you are not playing cops, you are playing adventurers. Still charging in with greataxes and flinging fireballs and still looting your victims.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
YawarFiesta wrote:

The River Kingdoms definitely have jousting and competitive archery if I remember correctly from Kingmaker AP.

Any sort of international or big national league or standard would be implausible due to long travel times so there is likely wild regional variations in a "rugby VS soccer" kind of way.

Humbly,
Yawar

A modern national league certainly not, but a system where each regio sends a team to the capital once a year and they play against each other in a tournament could certainly exist.

Together with regular games on a local level without any score keeping.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I still think 2E APs have a serious problems which also affects Starfinder. Paizo is, for whatever reason, using uncommon (for PF/SF) adventure hooks instead of the normal adventurers. Circus, City Watch, a tournament, space trucker, etc.
Not sure how well Strength of Thousands with its school background is working out, but in the other APs the hook quickly fades away and the APs play out like any generic PF game with dungeon crawling and looting.
Agent of Edgewatch being probably the AP with the biggest disconnect between the hook/scenario and how it played.

Either Paizo really has to lean into its uncommon scenarios and rewrite a big part of how adventures are supposed to play out for each AP or they have to go back to having generic adventurer APs as thats who the rules are written for.


Leon Aquilla wrote:
Ixal wrote:


Earlier Starfinder books had a big problem with too small population sizes. It got better with Near Space with Vesk cities actually having millions of inhabitants.

But in general, the majority of core races would actually be small minorities in the Pact System because of their history or home.

The way I understood it, humanity sorta Titan A.E.'d itself when the Big G disappeared, and they're intended to be a majority-minority. But minority nonetheless.

Pretty much.

Humans have lost their main home planet (and it doesn't look like most of them managed to escape before that). They also exist on Akiton, but that is a small not all that hospitable planet. Same is true for Ysoki.
Lashunta have their own planet but they are restricted to one continent and the population density does not look to be all that high.
And Kasatha come from a tiny colony ship, so would be extremely rare in the Pact System outside of the big hubs.

Compared to that Vesk and Androids would have huge population sizes as would Ryphorians, Anacites, Barathu and Verthani who would be the majorites in the Pact System. Shirren are a wild card.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
The Raven Black wrote:

I am French. The French Revolutionary Terror was one of sources of inspiration for Galt. As was the Russian Soviet Revolution of 1917. But AFAIK Galt is very different from France in a number of meaningful ways. Where are the Chouans for one ?

Same for Taldor and Byzantium : it was one source of inspiration, but another was Louis XIV's France.

If you look for a deep level of in-world consistency when looking at Golarion, especially by referencing RL historical periods, you will be deeply disappointed.

Golarion is a nicely crafted patchwork of settings inspired by pop memes where it is fun to adventure, with its very own cosmology/mythology. Do not look for anything beyond this.

Sure there are no deep historic treaties in Golarion and some differences, just look at the at the role of nobility in historical politics and the complete lack of that in Golarion.

But the "inspiration" like you call it is there and goes beyond the completely obvious (despite what some people who don't recognize it are screaming). The existence of the Ulfen Guard, the word Satrapy and the similarity between Sarenrae and the historic Persian faith shows that the designer had more than just "meme" knowledge of the sources he used. Which means that historical knowledge is quite useful as it shows you with what material the designer worked with and can help filling in the gaps. Although yes, this historical source ends at the border in most cases as each country on Golarion was likely designed in isolation and then everything was put together.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:

“Galt's state of anarchy is a direct and exact copy of the Reign of Terror in France.”

A meme version of a constant bloody revolution, an exception, not the norm.

“And Qadira is a satrap. Dou you know what a satrap is? A form of provincial government used by Persians. It also has a Vizir with a lot of authority, another Persian specialty, although later coped by the caliphates.”

Way to misread, I mean specific governments, not that governments don’t exist. Qadira is satrap, and? Andorran is a democracy. Neither of which are the only ones.

“And right next to it you have Taldor, basically the Byzantine Empire including their history, use of prefectures, their complicated government and even having their own version of the Varangian Guard in the form of the Ulfen Guard with the exact same reason for existing.”

Other than the Ulfen Guard that distinction is baseless. They’ve said the Byzantine is an inspiration for Taldor, but claiming it’s an exact copy is nonsense.

Having prefectures and complicated governments is not something unique to the Byzantine.

You really need to learn more about history.

Galt is not a meme version of revolution, France did resolve into exactly this kind of anarchy, including beheading the ones who supported it in the first place. It wasn't called Reign of Terror for nothing. Even the notable characters are similar.

Qadira is in fact the only satrap in the inner sea region. And the term satrap was exclusively used for areas held by Persian Empires (even when they changed hands). Quadira also uses positions used by the Persians and even the characters have (ancient) Persian names.
It is a mashup of several eras of Persia, but the connection to Persia is obvious.

Same for Taldor. It has the same background as Byzantium, the byzantine politics were famous for being convoluted and bloody, so much so that byzantine even became a word meaning exactly that. And Byzantium also inherited the roman system of prefectures which made it special to feudal countries existing at the same time. And as mentioned there is the Ulfen Guard.
Really it is obvious that Taldor is the Byzantine Empire. The only thing missing are chariot races.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:

“And its not just behaviour, many nations on Golarion are obvious copies of historic real world nations (Galt, Qadira, ...).”

In aesthetics, not copies of the nations and government themselves.

“So when even the autors say "this is France/Persia but with magic" you of course look at how the historic France/Persia looked like when you want to know details the source books do not provide.”

Where have the authors said that?

Completely and utterly wrong.

Galt's state of anarchy is a direct and exact copy of the Reign of Terror in France. Thats government right there.

And Qadira is a satrap. Dou you know what a satrap is? A form of provincial government used by Persians. It also has a Vizir with a lot of authority, another Persian specialty, although later coped by the caliphates.

And right next to it you have Taldor, basically the Byzantine Empire including their history, use of prefectures, their complicated government and even having their own version of the Varangian Guard in the form of the Ulfen Guard with the exact same reason for existing.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

And its not just behaviour, many nations on Golarion are obvious copies of historic real world nations (Galt, Qadira, ...).

So when even the autors say "this is France/Persia but with magic" you of course look at how the historic France/Persia looked like when you want to know details the source books do not provide.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cheap serum of sex change exist. Problem solved.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kasoh wrote:


Anytime you want to use history as a basis for making a game decision, I find that it helps to remember the "Well Actually..." problem. At almost every level of history education you are told that what you learned previously was inaccurate, biased, or incomplete. And ultimately, we only know what was written down or what we can surmise from the traces of the peoples long past.

We think we know what was going on, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything. Someone could discover something tomorrow and upend our entire understanding of social dynamics of historical people.

That is to say, Anytime I think I know something about history, I have to accept that what I think I know is probably wrong in some respect and has no more authority than just making something up in most cases.

That said, I do enjoy attempts to make fantasy worlds fit into our understanding of historical economic models. Because thinking about questions like "How does druidic plant producing magic effect the size of farmlands in this location? Or "This town shouldn't be able to sustain itself with the listed population and industries. There must be an explanation." is fun to me.

We might not know all the details and get some of them wrong, but the similarity between some parts of Golarion and historical Earth go far beyond details.

I already mentioned Galt. It is a very close copy to France during the reign of terror. It not only features the same setup, the same instruments and the same institutions, but even some notable characters in Galt are very similar to real world persons like Robespierre.

Another country is Qadira. Not only does the description fit Persia )or rather, a province of Persia), although imo with a Arabian blend which is not much of a stretch as Persia was later conquered by Arabians, the books also use Persian terms when calling it a satrap or having the position of vizir.

Even Sarenrae who came to the inner sea region through Qadira has similarities to Ahura Mazda (the main Persian god) as both are unquestionably good sun deities.

Why is this done? Because its a shortcut. Designers start with an already established foundation they can build up on and when you only have a limited amount of pages its easier to say "like France/Persia but X" and devout your pages to detail X. If players want more information, some which would be too special as to be practical to be printed in a game supplement, they can then open a history book and find tons of information there.
Everybody wins.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Deriven Firelion wrote:

I thought PF2 was based on mythical interpretations of good and evil and some historical ideas?

It is, unless it isn't.

Golarion if full of things copied directly from history, but some vocal people pretend that despite this history is not relevant to the game.

When pressed they try to weasel out of it by saying "its not history, its tropes!" which is basically a other word for mythical interpretation (although I fail to see how Galt is supposed to be a trope and not a copy of historic France)

But then some other topics are supposed to be seen through a completely modern lense despite pretty much all PCs being serial mass murderer under modern standards and not to be allowed to do what they do in the APs.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Zoomba wrote:

@Temperans I would argue that even then, the better way to take Erastil is that he wants someone staying to run the home. Having that parent need to be the mother is what would make this Good god unduly fixated on traditional gender roles. Erastil could be just as set on encouraging a traditional rural 'small c' conservative lifstyle by strongly encouraging one parent to remain home and tend the hearth, ensure the household is looked after, and raise the children and the other out hunting/farming/doing work without caring particularly about whihc parent does which role.

I tend to be fine with Erastil as a god whole prefers a stay-at-home-parent type of family, but if that's the case, he should be just as fine if it's a stay-at-home dad while the mother is the primary out-of-house worker

The thing is, pregnancy itself and also nursing babies requires the mother to stay at or close to home. After that period is over they can switch roles if its advantageous, but it might be convenient not to to avoid disruption of work when roles are switched.

Not that staying at home has the same meaning as it does today (or rather, had half a century ago). In a typical pre-modern village there is plenty of necessary work to do at home so its not that one person is the provider and the other is not.

Someone made the suggestion that there is a ritual or blessing which basically turns the milk of an animal into baby formula to allow someone else to feed babies when the mother is away, and after thinking about it I warmed up to this idea.

That was basically the discussion back then and the point some people started to throw around insults and accusations.


Shirren_Human_Expert wrote:


On to my next point......48,000 seems like not a lot of people. I live in a "podunk small town" and that has 55,000 people. I'd like to think that the Idari came with a lot more people to at least, I'll assume many left when they pulled in but it seems like in the span of a generation or 2 you have millions of Kastathas roaming around the pact worlds having come from such a small sample size.

Earlier Starfinder books had a big problem with too small population sizes. It got better with Near Space with Vesk cities actually having millions of inhabitants.

But in general, the majority of core races would actually be small minorities in the Pact System because of their history or home.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
The Raven Black wrote:
Rysky wrote:
I'd say "You must demand and fight for others’ freedom to make their own decisions." directly challenges Stockholm Syndrome and other abusive relationships, but I can see people arguing over this.
FWIW I agree completely. The Liberator will empower the enslaved to get back in touch with their inner strength, shatter the shackles on their minds and decide in full confidence and freedom what they choose for themselves.

The big question is how does the Liberator recognizes what the real free will of someone is.

The danger, and probably the biggest fall risk for Liberators, is to assume that free will means agreeing with him and that everything else is a sign of indoctrination.
Where to draw the line between free will and coercion?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
PossibleCabbage wrote:
I still so no reason that Golarion should not be more culturally advanced than earth in some regards. Earthfall was like 11000 years before the present (and there was like a Star Trek civilization before it) whereas the earliest known human civilization on earth was around 3000BCE.

Considering that chattel slavery still exists in many parts of Golarion in what whey are they culturally more advanced?

Also as many nations on Golarion are heavily inspired by real world nations its a bit hard to at the same time be more advanced and yet still stay a recognizable copy.

Edit: Or are you now talking about a different topic than Slavery and Liberators? Because I still do as that is the thread topic.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
PossibleCabbage wrote:

The thing about Liberators and Prisons is that the Liberator ought to be much more inclined for something akin to restorative justice, where the perpetrator of the crime understands and admits the harm that they did and makes amends to the victim and the community to the extent that is possible.

Obviously, Pathfinder is a game where you have like "demon murder cults" so that sort of approach isn't going to work for all crimes, but it's going to be a better approach for the Liberator in 90%+ of cases where someone did a crime.

Sounds more Redeemer to me.

On the other hand, what is the Liberator supposed to do? Lock him up? Not exactly in line with what Liberators stand for. Make him work of his debt to society by doing community service, etc? Would force him to do something he doesn't want so a big no (prison slavery).

Leaves either punish him with fines (physical punishment is not really an option either) or hope that the criminal understands that he did wrong. If he does not then.... what?
No idea really what other option there is. Guess its back to imprisonment and arguing that its not forbidden by the code. Or the Liberator says that normal crime is not his responsibility and ignores it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Sibelius Eos Owm wrote:
...

If you consider something acceptable or not is subjective. Even with a modern mindset you will find many people who have no problem with working off your debt as long as the person is not mistreated and has a chance to eventually pay it instead of being kept in perpetual poverty even though that is (debt) slavery.

And in regions where slavery is still practiced you will certainly get very different answers about what is acceptabel.

What I said, or what I meant to say, was that "US" style chattel slavery (although not limited to the US but used around the globe. I only use US because most people here will be most familiar with that) was the worst kind of slavery based on:

- Enslavement without any fault of the slave
- No rights or protection from bodily harm
- Lives in poverty
- Harsh treatment
- No way to legally escape

Many forms of slavery used in history were better in one or more categories, for example it required the slave to do something to be enslaved like a crime or failing to repay a debt to slaves retaining their rights and posesions and have a way out if it. Up to the tiny fraction of slaves who lived a life of luxury.
Does any of those permutations make it acceptable? That is subjective. A Liberator would categorically say no. But when that differs from how the society, or worse the GM and players see it it creates problems.
Thats why I think that Paizo decided that on Golarion only chattel slavery which everyone can agree on is bad exists. (Based on them saying it was a mistake to have a LN slaver and other comments).
Introduce other forms of slavery at your own risk as it would make things more complicated.

You would even mean you have to define what slavery is. What about slaves who have been so indoctrinated to have accepted their lot in life (especially relevant for Liberators as they are all about personal choice). What about serfdom? Or the lowest rung in a caste system?

Again Absu for the win for requiring you to check if someone deserves smiting before doing so.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:

"Thing is, if you use more nuanced slavery based on history instead of always evil chattel slavery Paizo seems to have decided to use"

We call this softballing.

When I type that into google I get some very different results.

You are free to correct me when I get something wrong, but what I write here is based on actual history. Those things happened, even when you do not like it.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Rysky wrote:
You could also, I'unno, not try to downplay the other forms of slavery?

How is mentioning different forms of slavery downplaying them?

In history there simply was not just one form of slavery but many different kinds which varied by who could be taken as slaves, how they were treated and what rights they had. Often there were several types of slavery even within the same country.

That ranges from the worst kind of slavery, people abducted or even born into slavery and worked to death, over temporary or even voluntary slavery who still had rights and even property of their own to slaves, as pointed out above, who lived a better life than most people and even though they were forcibly taken certainly did not want to leave once they got a taste of living a luxorious life.

The first one was probably the most common (except maybe the born into thing, that was specific to the west/europe/usa as far as I know) and the one Paizo thinks of when talking about slavery. That slavery was "an upgrade" only applied to a tiny fraction of slaves.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Thing is, if you use more nuanced slavery based on history instead of always evil chattel slavery Paizo seems to have decided to use Liberators would quickly become too disruptive to be playable.
But even if you do, when you follow the Liberators code to the letter they would also object to imprisonment as PossibleCabbage already hinted at.
How can someone make his own choices when he is locked up?
And when you try to rationalize it by saying "it his own choices that lead to imprisonment" you are instantly on a slippery slope of justifing some forms of slavery.
And when you say that imprisonment is different and ok, then one can ask the question why locking some one up and leaving him to rot is better than locking someone up and forcing him to work? Especially as doing nothing can be more harmful psychically than doing nothing.

Thats why I like Absu as a deity as he has "Think before you smite" written into his code and thus can work in a less black and white setting.

PossibleCabbage wrote:
No one is ever "fairly enslaved" nor does anybody wish to remain enslaved.

In Golarion as envisioned by Paizo that is probably true, but in history there were instances where people wanted to be enslaved because it presented a rare form of upward mobility.

For example Osman Jannisary. They were essentially slaves, children taken from christian families at young age and trained into fanatical muslim elite warriors. Not unlike the Unsullied from Game of Thrones.
But they were quite high ranked and also took over administrative duties and rivaled nobility in status and power. So much so that often muslim families tried to smuggle their children into them.

Another example would be the Mamluks, which translates into "slave dynasty". A not insignificant country whichs upper echelon was made up entirely by slaves purchased and abducted from far away countries and even the ruler himself was elected from within the ranks of slaves.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
David knott 242 wrote:

Another point:

"*You must respect the choices others make over their own lives, and you can’t force someone to act in a particular way or threaten them if they don’t."

A slaver is making choices over other people's lives, so those choices are not covered here.

Otherwise, you could have the weird situation that it is always preferable for a Liberator to free slaves violently rather than non-violently (as the latter might involve non-lethal coercion). It would be more logical to suggest that decisions made about other people's lives need not be respected by a Liberator.

That makes things more complicated.

It was obviously written with only US chattel slavery in mind, but what for example with enslavement as punishment for a crime (assuming no wrongful conviction)?
Or debt slavery when the slave, through his own choices and bad luck, accumulated enough debt to be enslaved when he could not pay it back? Or even choose to be enslaved under certain conditions as payment?

Historically it was also very common for defeated soldiers in a war to be enslaved. When the slave was not pressed into service but chose to become a soldier wouldn't slavery be a consequence of his choice he accepted when he made it?

It also touches on other things. The separation of church and state. While total separation is a modern concept there was always a conflict about secular and divine authorities. And while you have Rahadoum no noble anywhere except very pious ones would be thrilled to be overruled by clergy, especially as on Golarion you have dozens of different faiths. If they all could overrule him any secular title would be as good as powerless.
And while all this won't stop a Liberator, it will certainly affect how he is treated which is in many cases probably like a vigilante (Punisher, not Batman). Even a good ruler is probably not keen on a liberator executing a delegation from Cheliax which was just passing through.


Wesrolter wrote:

Ouch... 35 credits is really going to break the poor average joes bank... He might have to save an extra fortnight to get full flight on his vehicle, rather then hover... Seriously, the difference between a Hover and flight hybrid is 5%... since the base cost for a level 1 vehicle is 700, Hover would be 770, while hybrid flight is 805... Average unskilled joe can Save about 100 credits a Month (Half is wage covers home/food and such) if he really wanted to. So less then a year for 1 guy to buy a Flying Ford Focus. Sounds doable to me.

When you cobble together the cheapest option with the new vehicle rules, sure. When you stick to actually published vehicles it gets a bit more expensive, especially when you do not use Dawn of Flame and instead of the Performance Cruiser your cheapest option for a flying car is the Police Cruiser.


Wesrolter wrote:

Why is it so impossible for Joe public to have hover cars and a domestic drone? There is no life span for a Domestic, so nothing says they can't have been around for a while in the family. How long would it take for someone in reality to out right buy a car by saving up first? With rough numbers, unskilled labour can potentially do it with a year in Starfinder.

Like in real life, I would say banks are still a thing for stuff like loans.
If you treat the level as 'easily available' for PCs, as in no background checks, no waiting for it to be commissioned and such, cutting the back log queue. It still works as a world. Why does a domestic family have that Domestic Drone? Loans and waiting X time for delivery.

Because to have a domestic drone or even a flying, not just hover, car (something so common to have frequent aerial traffic jams) you need to be higher level. How does Joe Average level?

And if Joe is not beholden to the item level rules why are the PCs? Why can't they take out a loan to buy stuff with? After all they have a starship as collateral (or is that worth nothing like it isn't in-game?)
Answer: Because it would break the wealth by level system a lot of the game is build around.

No matter how you turn it, lore/fluff and what happens in the game do not fit together at all. And while some people are OK with that, as they simply tune out everything except adventuring while gaming, in a really good system both what happens in the game and the lore would work together instead of being incompatible.

So "A Galaxy of Tech" is a nice read, but if you try to use anything from it in the game as a player you are stopped hard.


Ixal wrote:
Tiaras of Translocation Mk3 would rival spacecraft for interplanetary transportation because they are maintenance free and easily pay for themselves even when you undercut traditional spellcasting.

Should of course be "undercut fares on spaceships."

Spaceships themselves are of course another huge problem for fluff as they are technically free and everyone is fine with random people having nuclear weapons.


Rysky the Dark Solarion wrote:

Your continued use of the word fluff is telling as always, you hate the setting, we know, that doesn’t mean the setting doesn’t work, nor does it mean we can’t get more flavor again, as this very book shows.

As for transmissions, you know those aren't instantaneous the longer the difference and also subject to interception even with encryption. If anything the physical passage makes a safer bet if anyone.

Item level restrictions are a metagame construct for PCs, not NPCs working day jobs.

And exactly those metagame constructs are the problem. Starfinder is full of them and they cause the game to be vastly different than how the fluff presents it, because the PCs can never match what they are supposed to be able to do according to the fluff. Owning a flying car like everyone else? Only at higher level because of level restrictions and exponential costs (when you stick to published designs). Those Joe Averages must be really rich to afford one. Seems like going adventuring was a bad career choice.

The other problem is the abilities the game gives would fundamentally alter the setting when applied to the entire population instead of just being limited to the PCs.
Hospitals would look very different then what Tech Revolution describes, maybe not even exist in a recognizable form, because healing serums would take care of any physical problem more cheaply than paying for a resident doctor and equipment. Hospitals would only be there for diseases because white hypopens are expensive. And you would not only have doctors in there but also many spellcaster who simply use spells to heal.

The food industry would not exist as presented because clear spindle aeon stones are just so cheap and would save you a ton of money so a large portion of people would have them crashing the food market. Eating would be a luxury for special occasions. Likewise Tiaras of Translocation Mk3 would rival spacecraft for interplanetary transportation because they are maintenance free and easily pay for themselves even when you undercut traditional spellcasting.
Especially in the "lucrative data transport business" with sensitive data no one would transport them in a starship when instead they can teleport them over when you are so paranoid that you do not want to transmit the latest movie through space with a encryption.

Coupled with the ability to replicate anything with UPBs, including organic materials like food, there wouldn't be any need to physically ship items around. Its just data and UPBs.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Rysky the Dark Solarion wrote:
Ixal wrote:

Fluff books were one of my favorites in Shadowrun.

But I don't think they will work for Starfinder. Simply to little attention has been paid when the game was first creates to have a world that makes sense. Instead of you have gameist systems everywhere like the whole economy which do not make any sense from a in character point of view, so it is hard to write fluff which meshes with the system.
Tech Revolution proves you undeniably wrong from the start.

No it doesn't. A few pages are something different than an entire book of fluff. And even the small sections in Tech Revolution only really work when you completely ignore the reality of Starfinder with item levels restricting purchases, exponential costs (good luck buying a car in Starfinder) and the ability to replicate anything everywhere (why ship goods when you can instead ship UPB and a schematic?) and so on.

Why would emergency care be anything other than serums of healing which are just so cheap? Clinics use Sprayflesh? Really? And media being shipped physically around the pact worlds instead of transmitted with encryption is also rather unbelievable.
And how can most people own domestic drones when you need to be level 2 to buy one?
And the list goes on.

Granted, sometimes the fluff does take specific game mechanics into account like how locks account for the lock spells ability to open two locks at once.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Fluff books were one of my favorites in Shadowrun.
But I don't think they will work for Starfinder. Simply to little attention has been paid when the game was first creates to have a world that makes sense. Instead of you have gameist systems everywhere like the whole economy which do not make any sense from a in character point of view, so it is hard to write fluff which meshes with the system.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

You don't have to explain Paizos reasoning to me. I just disagree heavily with them as the hover chairs are very immersion breaking both by the way they function and how they fit in the setting.

That the chairs change their attributes depending on the user is just plain stupid. Yes you can argue that the Nuar does not fit into the chair of the Dwarf to dodge the issue, but you have the same problem when a Dwarf uses the chair of a Nuar and no paper thin excuse. Or when a Human uses a Dwarf chair (both medium) etc.

And Paizo did shoot themselves in the foot by making disabling injuries so easy to heal and augmentations so cheap and easy to use. When that is the case of course you, logically, won't have many disabled people in the setting.
The same way you won't have many obvious transgender when you can get sex change serums out of vending machines. Paizo needs to decide if they want to represent people with their real life struggles in their games (but then not represent their struggles or want their games to have easy solutions for those struggles which are not available in real life. You can't have both.

And while others are ok with just saying "don't think about it" I am not. Not being allowed to think about aspects of the game world and not being able to interact with them in any creative way because they have been designed to be broken from the ground up destroys one of the main advantages and draws of RPGs.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I disagree.
The single biggest advantage pen & paper rpgs have over any other form of gaming is the freedom and interactivity you can have. Being then told to "don't think about" aspects of the game runs directly counter to the core of rpgs.


Apart from the fact that augmentations in Starfinder are so cheap that the need for a hoverchair as disability aid is rather questionable, its cheaper to get several replacement limbs or a necrograft spine replacement (not needed if you rule that the spine is a valid thing for a prosthetic) than a basic hoverchair, having all attributes of the chair being dependent on the user is problematic when there is no user as the party is using it as a high tech wheelbarrow to carry their loot.

And it also looks quite silly when the same chair suddenly becomes much faster because instead of a Dwarf a Nuar is riding it. It gets even more silly when the same chair is now suddenly not only able to support the 300 pound Nuar but also much more equipment as the Nuar happens to have a lot higher strength than his envoy Dwarf friend.

In that case its more advantageous that the Nuar is using the chair and carrying the Dwarf on its shoulders instead of the Dwarf sitting in it.

It would be better to give hoverchairs base stats for carrying capacity and speed, cheap upgrades for their stats and saying that characters starting with a hoverchair also automatically get all the upgrades they need so that the performance of the chair matches their natural abilities. (Although I confess, that would open loopholes of using hoverchairs becoming better than without them when you upgrade them enough. So there needs to be some kind of limit to that).


Leon Aquilla wrote:

There is probably a discussion to be had about whether alienation of flesh is a theme that should be explored and if Starfinder even has those tools to explore it available.

Shadowrun, Cyberpunk RED, and other systems in the same vein have ways of measuring just how much a toll not having original limbs/organs takes on your psyche or health. Starfinder seems to take the Rick and Morty approach - regrow a limb like you're microwaving McDonalds, no biggie.

As we've seen recently with 5e struggling to sell splats not related to killing monsters, the main thing d20 seems to be good at reflecting is close, personal combat. Bolt-on systems on top of that are hit or miss.

The only time I recall ever seeing a cybernetic being mentioned in narrative is Commander Najiri in Attack of the Swarm who's trying out her new ankle/foot after having a prosthetic installed. The book says she's trying out her roundhouse kick when the group enters her office so I had her immediately stand at attention and say "I wasn't doing anything.", before sitting down and carrying on like nothing had happened.

A bit late for that as Verces exists.

Also there is a bar on Absolom, I think both mentioned in Pact Worlds and a semi important location in a AP which is run by a pair of heavily augmented people. And when I remember right its implied that this is a lifestyle choice and not result of an accident, although I am not totally sure about that.