Gritte's page

I agree that how the Aspis are perceived has a lot to do with how a GM presents the Consortium. In my opinion I don't see them as necessarily evil, but they are underhanded and ruthless. However, I have never seen the authors of PFS scenario's portray them as having a better purpose than the Pathfinder Society. I liken it to the 'Froggy' story in "Lethal Weapon 4"... they're just different.

What time will this be released "today" ??? I've been waiting all day to read it so I can judge it on Friday.

The cards are Rules References so in my opinion are as golden as if they were in the book themselves. The Core Rulebook is unclear and in my opinion the card is Paizo's way to clearing up the rule until V7.0 comes out which may be never.

As a long-time Pathfinder player, but new to PFS I found the new factions much more interesting than the old ones. In fact, as I was authoring my 1st PFS toon I was looking at the old factions and trying to find which she might best associated with. Then I read the new Season 6 rules and had to reconsider which faction she'd find herself in.

So, for those of you transitioning a character: a character need not identify with all goals or beliefs of a faction. I find it well within the realm of possibility that one might find themselves more inclined towards a faction based on a singular goal. Hell, it's not wrong to conceive how a character may align themselves with said particular goal and attempts to internally change the remaining viewpoints of the faction to totally align with themselves.