A little back ground on my group. Together we have been playing for 20+ years. The newest player who joined us was 12 years ago.
We went from 1st to 4th then back to 3.5 and now to pathfinder. What I have been encountering is 2 of my player keep wanting to change the rules of the game. I will list the things they like to change below.
What I need is some way of countering there points of view. Or a way of proving to them that giving them that option is going to unbalance the game.
1. Feats every level for all character classes
A. Player’s argument is that characters should get something
every level. This is addition to what the character class
all ready has(No skill points and hit points do not count).
B. Player's argument is there are a lot of feats and I want to be
good at more than one thing.
C. Players argument is this will bring all character classes to
be more balanaced(This one still has me going HUH WTF as they
think the cleric has ben nerfed and the fighter is to powerful)
2. Casters should not have to make concentration checks when hit in combat
A. Players argument is that the fighter types do not have to make
a concentration check when hit to keep fighting.
3. Maximum hit point every level (this I may use after the combat I just ran them threw)
A. Player’s argument is that all PC’s should have max hit points.
As it stops you from have low hits points when you are suppose
to be a front line fighter type.
4. Wizards being able to regain spells more than once every 24 hours
A. Players argument is they do not want to have to wait and redo
spells every 24 hours
B. Players argument is to use spell points
So any ideas?
Thanks for you help
