A 13 int fighter has 4 skills per level, vs a 7 int rogue with 6 per level. Depending on skill choice the two very different characters could appear almost the same.
So the average person in pathfinder can throw a club/knife/spear accurately, but not a rock? That seems like a reasonable stance to take.
So now that it has been shown how you give your horse pounce you can accept that ragelancepounce works?
At 3rd level, a cavalier learns to make more accurate charge attacks while mounted. When you are mounted and use the charge action, you may move and attack as if with a standard charge and then move again (continuing the straight line of the charge). If you direct your war-trained mount to attack in battle, you can still make your own attack or attacks normally. This usage is a free action. There seems to be a lot of rules that suggest you being mounted does not change the charge action. Is there going to be some effort to change all that?
The -2 constitution is essentially offset by taking Resilent(or some other trait) and Toughness. In exchange for 'needing' to get a trait and a feat you get a natural attack plus some other proficiencies or natural attacks. Tengu don't excel at everything but -2 to con isn't the death sentence people are making it out to be.
The problem is that Rogues are too heavily tactical, and the average player doesn't play like that, and when the do it's REALLY easy for a GM to throw a monkey wrench at them.As opposed to every other class? For example, if the Rogue is scouting, have a monster grapple ad subdue her, drag her away, and slit her throat.If only rogue's had some way to be hard to detect ... Rogue trying to stealth in combat? Nope. As soon as the Rogue moves out of cover, she is revealed.If only Rogue's had some class feature that helped with that ... Rogue is flanking? Bull rush or counterflank.Rogue's cant flank every round of combat, ohh noes .... Rogues, even with Uncanny Dodge, can still be flanked.Are you saying the reason Rogue's are weak is higher level rogues? They don't suffer the normal AC penalty, but it still prevents them from sneak attacking. No it doesn't. Plus, you pointed out that Rogues need to work as a team. Nobody wants a character who's worthless without Swordy McStupidhead to set their moves up. People have pointed out that Rogue's benfit from working as a team, but then again, so does every other class. It's almost like working together is a valid tactical choice.
It doesn't say anywhere that the Sohei can make flurry of blows while wearing armor. So congrats, you're class isn't that rigged again. He's simply proficient with light armor... It also doesn't say a monk can flurry while wearing a hat.
Fighters rock. They're unequaled as archers, and the barbarian is the only one who can go toe-to-toe with them in melee (and when he's out of rage, the scale tips back towards the fighter).Exactly. And unlike the fighter, a simple second level spell shuts down muich of his offensive and defensive powers (easily killing him if he's only still standing due to his rage bonus hp). Calm Emotions stops everyone from fighting, and a barbarian is better suited then a fighter at resisting it. Not to say fighters suck because of that, just that resisting spells isn't really going to be an area that fighters are better then barbarians.
I heard they are nerfing it in Ultimate Tea Ceremony.
Geisha is really strong for buffing someone before they have a duel or give a speech. That's what you're looking for when you ask about who is the best, right?
When charging on horseback, you deal double damage with a lance (see Charge). You don't think they are the same things, the designers don't agree with you on that point.
If your mount charges, you also take the AC penalty associated with a charge. If you make an attack at the end of the charge, you receive the bonus gained from the charge. When charging on horseback, you deal double damage with a lance (see Charge). Do people even bother to read the rules? How are you not charging, when the rules on mounted combat clearly say you are charging?
Benefit: When you are mounted and use the charge action, you may move and attack as if with a standard charge and then move again (continuing the straight line of the charge). Your total movement for the round can't exceed double your mounted speed. You and your mount do not provoke an attack of opportunity from the opponent that you attack. Benefit: When mounted and using the charge action, you deal double damage with a melee weapon (or triple damage with a lance). The mount is doing the charging and the barbarian is getting the bonus from the mount, not the other way around. Head Explode!!!
Bard's don't get Know Direction(which only tells you north, not where you are) or Endure Elements (which only protects from hot or cold environments, not storms). Mending works on an item 1lb/per caster level, so the third level bard isn't going to be working on a ship. Prestidigitation would be slower then simply mopping. Giving someone a scroll who can't use it is pretty useless. Scrolls need supplies to be made, if you don't have those supplies, you can't make them. Your examples don't make any sense.
I ... am not left handed - Inigo Montoya
A bad guy who sunders stuff might force a party to retreat, or has a pet rust monster.
Huh, doesn't spell sunder add the broken condition to a spell? Win^
You just need to have your party wizard use a readied action to cast dominate person on your after you activate the ability but before you actually use the weapon. Then they have you throw the weapon down, you quickdraw something totally awesome, like a guitar, and you totally melt everythings face.
If you can wait till the right near the end of the show you can see them entering in there data on a high-powered computer system, which is a laptop running excel.
I do think it's interesting that almost all of the casting strategies to take down the all-mighty "AM BARBARIAN" included rules discrepancies. Where as it's been fairly simply to follow the barbarian route, which is full attack or sunder.
There is a rumble in grandfathers chest, the being of pure night quakes too and fro. Suddenly a rip appears in grandfathers chest as a glass jug appears, filled with blood. The chalice has a face that it's twisted in unholy fury. Umbriere Lunas stares in horror, as the creatures mouth opens, and it lets out a furious "Ohhhh Yeah!!"
It's implausible that an Arcane Archer wouldn't have a magic bow, it's not impossible. So it's not a useful ability, however it's not useless either.
If only there were casters who didn't have to worry about a spell book.... woah is me ;)
Unbelievably powerful. Most of the time in fights you will attack more often the the TWF dudes, even though you are just swinging one big ole sword. You will also hit more often then anyone else, cause most of your attacks are at your highest attack bonus. You will also hit harder, cause you are two handing your weapons and getiing a nice strength bonus. And chicks will dig you more, cause you aren't wearing a shirt and are totally ripped.
Guys the barb is on a dire bat (flying, blindsense) and prismatic sphere is centered on the wizard, so if two balors, one human enter, no human leave, that would suggest that int may have been a dump stat for the wizard. Also, he already said he killed you, so you lost. Caps lock beats logic. I do think more talking about how to make 'Timer + Reactive NPCs + multiple sequential encounters' would be useful for higher level play when there is some balance.
How is this talent supposed to work? It say's if you hit someone with a concealed weapon in the surprise round they take max damage. A surprise round only allows a standard or move action. Even with Quick Draw you can only draw a hidden weapon as a move action. So does that mean the concealed and hidden are the same term, thus making this pretty useless unless you take the bandit archetype. Or is concealed just flavor text that means a weapon that you don't spend your standard action telling your enemies about, but instead hit them with it.
his makes barbarians and paladins well made, and fighters needing a fix. Really? I need to explain this to you? Really? Dueling comes from the Latin word Dual. Dual means two, fighters have two hands, and a barbarian is only one man, two is better then one, ergo, Fighters are better then Barbarians. I just blew your mind there, didn't I? On a different, less insane note, I have a CAGM/pounce/superstition barb that I am playing with a TWF who's well over wealth by level, and has crazy stats, and have had the chance to totally outdamage him, to out survive him, and amusingly enough make the save vs Mass Hold Person which he failed last week. I'm totally digging being the once and future combat king.
I love when people say this and think it doesnt apply to them. I get targeted a lot, not because I am doing anything wrong (most of the time), but because it makes others feel superior, better about themselves. This couldn't be because you like to bicker, fight or pick on others, could it? Must be that everyone else is a big meanie. Sadly, I have made mistakes in the past. As such I developed a reputation early on. It's like in high school. You don't want to be the guy with the reputation. Makes for an easy target. People are suggesting that you are still earning that reputation, maybe you should reevaluate. |
