![]() ![]()
Hi :-) Boons - it's been said a few times but what makes a boon fun is that it makes a character different - a permanent fun boon is waaaay better than a mechanical benefit. Even if there's little or no mechanical benefit I'd far rather have a flavor boon. Also, spending boons for one off bonuses (no matter how powerful) would be pretty soul destroying (bye bye vanarra, dhampir, ganzi - hello minor benefit on rolls). GM boons are a thank you for the time effort and often money that GMs have put into making conventions fun. Printing, buying maps, buying minis etc... quite often you'll look round a convention hall and see GMs have scratch-built 3D terrain or created unique minis for important foes... We do it to make the gaming experience as fabulous as possible for our players, GM boons have always been really important to me in feeling that Paizo values that effort and investment. ![]()
I’d be really really keen to continue to receive race boons for my GMing. But that wasn’t the question. For me it’s about something that makes my character different; not more powerful. That’s why I like the race boons; you can make a unique(ish) character and the races aren’t way too powerful (ignoring Aasimar). I like the idea of being granted access to unique Gods, but then I’d hope the whole player base would get access to a wider pantheon soon; the core 20 are too limiting. What about “blooded” boons with minor benefits; Eg
![]()
Likes: 1) 3 action system
Hates: 1) spellcasters have been nerfed into the floor
(I also hate resonance for consumables but I think that fits in point 3 - it’s en example of defecit-model game design aimed at restricting rather than enabling players) ![]()
I’m not against Resonance, but I think the rules need to be so absolutely clear and watertight about when RP are spent to invest, activate etc, or where (like the ghost sound example) investing gives you a free activation ability.... As written it’s really grey area and has the potential to cause so much grief at the table... ![]()
SamosNemo wrote:
I’m under the impression you’d still need to spend RP to invest the weapon... ![]()
Hmm. Cantrips are sounding very similar to at will spells in another game I wont mention. PROS
CONS
|