Alexander Bielke's page

Looking forward to it. Please some more standalone Adventures, for those with limitets on time and participants (and their regularly attendance), they are much more useful than APs.

October update: "[...]but we would rather take a few extra weeks than rush this out the door and have issues in perpetuity."

How much are a "few" aproximately? Closer to 15 weeks or closer to 25?

Just wondered about that topic, too. Isn't it supposed to provide 2 fame and 2 reputation for each, primary and secondary goal?

It is still not solved, at least my points are still wrong, but since they did not publish the boons either, there is no urgent need.
I hope the introduce the boons soon, though. It's a bit embarrassing to announce it in the guide and then not following up on it.

Yes, I got only 1 point for every regular szenario I run, no matter the event but got 2 points for running the Sandstone Quest on a con.

In my opinion, and the way I understand the system, I think it should work as stated on pages 445-446 and that the entry on page 278 was an oversight.
Since I have to argue with "rule-lawyers" on tables, I would appreciate an official clarification on the point of attack rolls.

GMs did not get a downtime for their chronical in PFS 1. Is that still the case in PFS 2, considering that downtime has become a much more structured and relevant part of the game (retraining, crafting, etc.)?
I can't find anything about that topic, one way or the other, in the Guild Guide.

Prepping the scenario for a home game right now and there is one point that really bugs me and I need to get it of my chest: Titus and Lal can hear the battle with a DC 30 Perception check...Lal has +9, Titus has +1 (in hight tier, as a rogue)...how?
There is no chance for them to make that check. Why even give a DC? Or a preperation routine?
Why would you give a rogue a +16 on disable device check and no perception?