Alan_of_Q's page

Seriously, Druid or Oracle are great substitutions; the Druid even moreso, as they aren't a particularly effective healing class, due to reduced Cure progression (but maintain full status removal progression), and still function as a full Divine Spellcaster.

Neither Restoration nor Panacea appear on the Druid spell list. I should also point out that Remove Blindness/Deafness, Remove Curse and Remove Paralysis are also not on their list. Heal is a spell level higher. How are they full status removal progression?

Alan_of_Q wrote:

Example B: Human (base natural armour of 0) is wearing an amulet of natural armour +1 (provides a +1 enhancement bonus to natural armour) total natural armour of +1 on his character sheet. He later receives a +3 enhancement bonus to natural armour from Barkskin. New total Natural armour of +3 on his character sheet as both Barkskin and the Amulet of Natural Armour provide enhancement bonuses to natural armour and as such they do not stack.

Ok, you have some rules interactions incorrectly applied.

The human with a natural armor bonus of 0 is wearing an Amulet of Natural Armor +1. So the +1 enhancement bonus is applied to the natural skin to be a +1 NAC and the +1 NAC is applied to his AC.

When he later gets the bark skin, it applies to his skin. He will have +3 (the barkskin and the natural +0) as a natural armor bonus applied to his AC.

Combining the two effects, he would have a non-stacking +1 from skin+aona and +3 non-stacking +3 from skin+barkskin. The two don't stack so he uses the +3 from the barkskin and the amulet is ignored.

Did you even read what I wrote mate? Given that you've just repeated me, I'm going to assume you misread my post.

Make them redo their stats, changing everything is way more work, and you can make good characters with point buy still.

Wicked lies. Point buy is horribly biased toward one-stat caster bunnies.