I am around! Still bouncing around PFS. No sign of Ferrek, though?
Nope. Not for months.
The tree of us are definitely the die-hards. I'd be happy to continue a game with these characters, or new ones. A dedicated group is the most important thing to the success of a game, and we definitely have that.
Honestly, this was something that I started a long time ago, before I started to develop preferences for DnD. I've been gaming in-person for a long time now, and this kind of super-die-hard dungeon isn't something that I really prefer.
I'd gladly take you three for another game, if you trust me to be around.
We've all come this far.
Certainly. I'd be up for another game as long as you're into running it.
Then I'd have to ask - what kind of game would you be into? Urban intrigue? Classic dungeoneering? Exploration? Empire-building? Something else?
Do you have any preferences for the setting? I'm going to be DMing on Golarion, but like...do you wanna play a dwarfy campaign or an elfin campaign or a halfling campaign? A Hellknight campaign or a Magaambyan Arcanist campaign? Is there some group on Golarion that interests you?
Recently I've been getting into a lot of the Golarion lore with running RL campaigns and modules. I've learned bits and pieces of the Pathfinder society, something of the Mwangi expanse in Serpents Skull, Tian Xa in Jade Regent and the Ruby Phoenix Tournament, Ustalav from the Carrion Crown path, a bit of Numeria in Iron Gods, Iobaria and other Worlds in Reign of Winter, and something of Hell Knights from Council of Thieves.
I'd prefer exploration or Urban Intrigue. I've done a fair amount of Empire building and a lot of Dungeoneering, so something fresh would be nice. I've also seen a good deal of Dwarven type campaigning so probably not that.
Wouldn't mind trying an Elf or Halfling campaign.
What he said. ^
I will go with the flow--no real preference. :)
Would we be sticking with these characters, or making new ones?
I'd want to rebuild this character a bit, at least…and the rest depends on the campaign.
I could conceivably see sticking with Garret and Aviel but not Shadassa or the other way around.
I have a campaign seed involving a short adventure in childhood at an academy, or I could see an underwater campaign.
Otherwise we'd probably want to go to new ones.
New characters is fine with me.
Same here with new characters. I'm very intrigued by the academy one, I don't think I've ever run a game as a young adventurer before.
Okay. I have a concept that interests me. I still need to do some development, so I'm not nearly ready yet, but...
Would the "Academy" story, where you start off pre-adulthood, interest everybody? Set in a dwarf/gnome style setting?
Sure, sounds fun.
Sure!
Alright sure, I can bear through some more Dwarfness.
Are you actually opposed to it?
I want to be communal about campaign germination.
No, not really. I would merely prefer a less Dwarf inspired campaign but I am in no real way opposed to it.
More friendly to the idea rather than helpful; were my starting attitude was to be measured on the Diplomacy scale.
I have never rolled up a gnome; that would be fun. I do have a few dwarven concepts floating around--none have seen play.
What do you two think of going with all gnomes or all dwarves? I like those kinds of games.
Ok guys, I made a thread for it. Dot both threads, please. I'm writing, but we'll start character creation discussions soon.
Oh, and when all have dotted that thread so that it appears on your list of campaigns, I will make this one inactive.
Remember to dot both threads! I am closing this thread tomorrow.