GM Granta's AP Planning

Game Master Granta

Skills Spreadsheet


651 to 700 of 913 << first < prev | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | next > last >>

As horribly tempting as it is to explore some of those opened up class options, I think it is best if I stick with the Inquisitor. If it falls through or someone thinks a melee Alchemist or a Cavalier would be better suited, I'd be open to switching!

EDIT: Beastmorph Alchemist could be fun...

This is what I was thinking so far:

N Human Heretic Inquisitor of Abadar

Traits - Taldan Patriot, Eyes and Ears of the City
Travel Domain (No spells)

Str: 18 Dex: 14 Con: 12 Int: 10 Wis: 14 Cha: 8

Skills (6)
Bluff 5
History 5
Intimidate 4
Perception 10
Sense Motive 11
Stealth 8
Survival 6

Feats
1 Toughness
B Skill Focus (Sense Motive)
B Story Feat
2 TW
3 Quickdraw
B TW Precise Strike
5 Power Attack
6 TW Outflank
7
8 Skill Focus (Perception)
9
B TW ???
11

Thoughts?

Melee focus for sure, otherwise I suspect the bonus TW feats will be planned mostly with Akorian and our pseudo melee oracle. I have a vision of an Abadarian that wants Taldor to earn back its former glory, but is unhappy with the current way of things. To that end, he is willing to upend the laws/traditions he needs to for the betterment of this civilization. Crossbow as Abadar's favored weapon, maybe a sort of switch hitter might be good? He'd only need Power Attack and Quickdraw to not suck at it I think...

Sovereign Court

Totally forgot the most important part: we won't start until early May. The pandemic will up end a lot of stuff for the next few weeks, and then I have a ton of stuff going on the second half of April.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Mostly Human Boomer 3

If you asked me what class I wanted to play in a campaign set in Taldor one of my top choices would have been cavalier. However, in an urban intrigue setting the mount is going to be close to useless so I won’t bite. A bolt ace gunslinger would be tempting to try to build as a switch hitter..... but no... I will stay the course.

@Gummy - I like the idea of a switch hitter. Otherwise, I like your take on Abadar worship it should be fun.


Aww man, I was hoping to play during pandemic as I wouldn't be able to leave the house as much! Not starting until May stinks, but I get it. I thought we were ready to go which is why I shifted to taking our 4 and going.

Since we have the time, do we want to recruit a 5th?


Mostly Human Boomer 3

I’d still like to make a go of it with four. I’d could be persuaded if someone is stuck in a role they don’t like and we recruit for that slot/role. However, I like the idea of it being more challenging with four. Just my thoughts.

Sovereign Court

Wingnut20x6 wrote:
Aww man, I was hoping to play during pandemic as I wouldn't be able to leave the house as much!

What is everyone else's stance? Would it actually be easier to play right now?


Mr. Hebeme wrote:
I’d still like to make a go of it with four. I’d could be persuaded if someone is stuck in a role they don’t like and we recruit for that slot/role. However, I like the idea of it being more challenging with four. Just my thoughts.

I'm up for the challenge. Just thought I'd ask

GM Granta wrote:
What is everyone else's stance? Would it actually be easier to play right now?

Totally get it if others' lives are crazy right now, but unless I actually get sick, which I don't foresee my day-to-day eliminating the chance to play daily.

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none

My life is as un crazy as ever right now, it would be easier to get set and go for me. I will tinker with the feat tonight and post it and add the spell list tomorrow.


Mostly Human Boomer 3

I have a bunch of time right now.


N Male Half-Orc Ranger (Dandy) 1 | Speed 20 ft. | AC 20, T 12, FF 18 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +0 | Init +2 | Percep +0 | CMD 16 | Spells (0) unl. | Conditions: none

Test post to see if I captured some of Mr. H's formating

*Edit - success. This is the start of my character. Some details in the profile but it's not 100% complete, waiting on some final input/approvals


Also, I entered my main skills in the google sheet at the top of the page. If anyone else is interested in comparing so we can see what we're missing

Out of everything, the easiest for me to change would be K:Religion, if we really wanted me to get something else. UMD would be a solid choice, I can trait that into a class skill yet, or K:History or K:Planes.

I do plan to get some slight of hand and stealth eventually, but darn if I'm just not dexterous...

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none

I will add the spellbook tomorrow, it is late now, but here is what I came up with for the Story Feat.

Conversion of Conscience (Story):

Conversion of Conscience (Story)
Source Crisis of Conscience (Story) Champions of Balance pg. 5 altered by Andy Houghton

The pull of good or evil is very strong and your internal struggle is real but hidden deep within. The path’s before you have left you teetering on a knife’s edge between good and evil. You must choose which path you will make your own.

Prerequisites: evil or good alignment. Your alignment must start as either good or evil at 1st level or the last time you completed this feat (see Special).

Benefit: You confuse those who cleave to notions of morality as unwavering pillars that all are chained to. You project the habits and mannerisms those trying to read you expect. Whenever another character attempts to discern your alignment, loyalties, or intentions (including via magical effects such as detect thoughts, detect good, detect evil, or Sense Motive) you may roll a bluff in place of any Will saving throws to resist such effects at the same DC or to oppose Sense Motive. If you succeed you may alter the reading subtley. The result can not deceive by more than one alignment step or one level of alignment aura power, for instance you can not convince them that you are acting Lawful Good when you are in fact acting Chaotic or Evil, but you could increase or reduce the power of your aura of a detect evil by a step, or persuade someone that your actions are more from a sense of balance than good. A successful Bluff vs detect thoughts will give the reader the impression that you are behaving more or less ethically than you are in a manner of your choosing.

Goal: Release the chains of your original alignment with an act of decisive good or evil or several acts of moderate good or evil that is opposite of your starting alignment resulting in a shift to Neutral on the good/evil axis. Abandon your old ways, though the path to the other is not assured. Save others for no reason than they need a hero, or defile a church because it dared send one of it’s acolytes against you.

Completion Benefit: You are now so torn between good and evil you are now an open book to those who know you or study you. You can no longer manipulate Sense Motive, detect thoughts, or deceive detect good or detect evil spells. Detect thoughts returns a conflicted mess that reveals all of your secrets and struggles. Alignment damage now fuels you instead of harms you. You heal from Holy or Profane damage the way an undead heals from negative energy. The alignment damage sets your anger and hatred afire, but your mind internalizes that fire in a way that heals your soul. This does not affect negative or positive energy, they still heal and harm as they would any other creature of your type.

Goal: Resolve your conscience with an act of decisive good or evil that shifts your alignment accordingly. Acts of decisive good include dedicating your worldly wealth to a noble cause or charitable institution, risking death for the sake of others, or another notable sacrifice for a greater good. Acts of decisive evil include reducing a city to penury and starvation, murdering or terrorizing innocents, or other, darker deeds.

Completion Benefit: If your alignment changes from good to evil or evil to good, you know how to entice others down your path. While you retain this alignment, you gain a +2 bonus on Charisma- and Wisdom-based skill checks made to interact with a sentient creature of your previous (and now opposite) moral alignment. This bonus increases to +4 if success would cause the target to act against its moral alignment (at the GM’s discretion). If it does so, you retain this bonus when interacting with that target until its moral alignment is the same as yours.

If you return to your original moral alignment, you have gained deeper insight into your convictions. While you retain this moral alignment, you become aware of any action or item that could adversely affect your alignment or your standing with your deity (if you have one), including magical effects. You acquire this information prior to performing such an action or becoming associated with such an item if you take a moment to contemplate the act.

Special: If you’ve already completed this feat by changing to the opposite moral alignment you may take this feat a second time. You gain no additional basic benefits, but if you complete this feat’s goal a second time by crossing back to your original alignment, you gain additional completion benefits—you gain the third completion benefit, and can apply the first benefit against good and evil creatures.

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none

I put some things on the skill list.

At this time I only plan on maxing out K: Arcana and K: nobles. But I do plan on smattering in all the others focusing somewhat on planes, local and engineering.

Spellcraft and UMD will always be priorities.


Mostly Human Boomer 3

I updated the skill list too. I plan on maxing our k.local with a smattering in dungeoneering, nobility, and geography. Also, I have the ability to make one knowledge check a day using my profession merchant ranks/modifiers.


As far as a story feat, how about the forgotten past? Perhaps a head injury during training left him without his memories before coming to. He could have pieced some things together from his colleagues and official records, but he wouldn’t actually know/recognize anyone from that time period.

As to playing now vs later, I’d go for now! I’ll get a real character sheet up and put skills into the sheet tonight (so most likely 12hrs from now).

Starting spell approval:
Deadeye’s Lore
Abadar’s Truthtelling

Sovereign Court

My home internet isn't working, so won't be posting much until it's fixed.


Mostly Human Boomer 3

Hang in there!

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none

Altered my character to increase Int to 19. Adjustments made.

Spellbook:
0-Level
acid splash, arcane mark, dancing lights, daze, detect magic, detect poison, disrupt undead, flare, ghost sound, light, mage hand, mending, message, open/close, prestidigitation, ray of frost, read magic, resistance, touch of fatigue
1-Level
Burning hands, charm person, color spray, comprehend languages, disguise self, enlarge person, jump, mage armor, magic weapon, shield, sleep


Mostly Human Boomer 3

@ GM - are we using the versatile profession rule you created?

Sovereign Court

Apparently Verizon is having problems because of the pandemic, so not sure when I'll have internet again.

Sovereign Court

Avery Ocellio wrote:
Test post to see if I captured some of Mr. H's formating.

Check my GM profile for some resources, including formatting templates.


Mostly Human Boomer 3

All, I found this cool name generator link

With that Akorian is becoming Falx. My surname is locked in because of the Noble Scion feat.


N Male Human Beastmorph Alchemist 1 | AC 15, T 11, FF 14 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +3, Will +1 | Init +1 | Percep +10 | CMD 14 | Extracts 2/2 | Conditions: none

I think I'm going to just recycle this alias! Sheet isn't updated, but putting the skills in now. Picture will change as well.

EDIT: What do the columns mean in the spreadsheet? I did my best, but idk what "direct" and "profession" mean here.

Sovereign Court

I don't actually have internet yet, but can use my phone as a hotspot (for now). Fingers crossed.

Avery Ocellio wrote:
Some details in the profile but it's not 100% complete, waiting on some final input/approvals

Burning Assurance - approved

Sacred Tattoo - approved
Drawback - approved (FYI, creating a fire effect yourself would count as "An instantaneous fire effect adjacent to you")
Faith Trait - approved

Zenizar wrote:
here is what I came up with for the Story Feat

I don't like the idea of replacing a saving throw with a skill check, that makes success considerably easier. How about either:

A) a flat bonus on Will saving throws and Bluff checks to hide your alignment, loyalties or intentions

or

B) Adding an opposed Bluff check after the saving throw, in order to alter the information by one step

I like the idea of reversing your response to sacred and profane, but make it effects rather than just damage. For example, desecrate would provide you some bonuses, while consecrate would not.

Gummy Bear wrote:

As far as a story feat, how about the forgotten past? - approved

Deadeye’s Lore - approved
Abadar’s Truthtelling - approved

Zenizar wrote:
Altered my character to increase Int to 19. Adjustments made.

Spellbook should appear in your profile.

Mr. Hebeme wrote:
@ GM - are we using the versatile profession rule you created?

No, but players are encouraged to use their professions creatively. I will often allow non-standard uses.

Sovereign Court

PS Personality and backstory should be PMed to me, but everything else should be posted here.


N Male Half-Orc Ranger (Dandy) 1 | Speed 20 ft. | AC 20, T 12, FF 18 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +0 | Init +2 | Percep +0 | CMD 16 | Spells (0) unl. | Conditions: none

I have some updating to-do, may tweak my stats ever so slight;

@Tiber and Falx; I may give up entirely on being effective in melee to start with a CHA of 17 and be that much closer to a higher score; I am a full caster and I should focus on that for options. I can still carry a weapon and provide flank sometimes?

@group: how does everyone feel about our start on the skill sheet? With a party of 4, I know we aren't going to cover everything, but we have some noticeable slots open in the Knowledges especially. Anyone have any tweaks to suggest?


N Male Human Beastmorph Alchemist 1 | AC 15, T 11, FF 14 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +3, Will +1 | Init +1 | Percep +10 | CMD 14 | Extracts 2/2 | Conditions: none

I could move over to a melee alchemist. Being int-based, knowledges would make sense. Especially in an AP, I think knowledges are important and I don't expect the wizard to be the only one sinking ranks in them, especially when others can share the load!


@ExPat - I'm super unfamiliar with Alchemists; but I think you're right in that another int-based character could be benficial

So, all, I could use some group input on my character too. Struggling with identity for combat.

Things I'm happy with:
Oracle
healer role
backstory, but see below
face skills
Intrigue, but see below

Things I'm just not sure about:
final stat array (I feel like I should really be at a 17 or even 18 in CHA)
If I'm changing above, it comes out of STR. (prefer not to drop CON or INT) so if I'm not melee, what am I doing when not casting, aka while I wait for someone to put back together? I'm going to try to focus on the "put people back together" spells, but that means almost all my spell choices will be the standards, limiting my in-combat options.

SO, I love the flavor of intrigue, but I can RP flavor. Bonus skills make sense, revelations make sense, but the bonus spells aren't phenomenal.

Would it make better sense for our party to take Life, or something mechanically better? That would free me to make slightly more interesting choices with spells each level if I'm getting some standard. If I'm missing something I want, i can try using traits to get it back

I could be over thinking this, but I don't want to lock myself into my first choice if I'm going to get spells I won't use. Not locked into skill focus Disguise either; so feat slot is open....

Combat Advice, since we don't have a bard? Summon spells to bring in some help to a lower body count party?

What would you guys like to see?

I think I'd feel more comfortable being mechanically sound and modifying my backstory and character to fit that; I love inventing characters

Sovereign Court

@Wingnut20x6: At early levels, weapon attacks are plenty effective for you. At mid-levels, look for non-damage offensive options, i.e. combat maneuvers or items like tanglefoot bags and caltrops. And ready actions. That interrupt can turn little actions into big disruptions.


Neutral Male Human Ranger 1 | Speed 30 ft. | AC 18, T 12, FF 16 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +1 | Init +2 | Percep +5 {+7 vs humans}| CMD 15 | Conditions: none

@ Tiber - both inquisitor and alchemist are strong versatile choices. You can’t go wrong either way. For me alchemist edges out inquisitor.

@Wingnut - another versatile class with so many options. I don’t think there is a mystery that you can choose that will cripple our party. As far as stats go I agree with starting with at least a 17 but you could live with a 16. As far looking for something to do in combat other than cast spells look at the dual cursed oracle and the misfortune revelation.


I have had a dual cursed Life oracle in the wings for a long time... but the Intrigue mystery I think threw me in a different direction

I'm going to rebuild tonight and see if I like the feel better

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none
GM Granta wrote:


Zenizar wrote:
here is what I came up with for the Story Feat

I don't like the idea of replacing a saving throw with a skill check, that makes success considerably easier. How about either:

A) a flat bonus on Will saving throws and Bluff checks to hide your alignment, loyalties or intentions

or

B) Adding an opposed Bluff check after the saving throw, in order to alter the information by one step

I like the idea of reversing your response to sacred and profane, but make it effects rather than just damage. For example, desecrate would provide you some bonuses, while consecrate would not.

I realized in one of the edits I had struck the part about the save. The intent was on a successful save then the bluff check.

On the Good/evil Sacred/Profane I was trying to limit it, I know it may never come up, but I am turning a 2 step feat into a 3 and didn't want to much power involved.

I can absolutely tinker with that, I just was looking more for flavor at that point than power or crunch.

Zenizar wrote:
Altered my character to increase Int to 19. Adjustments made.

Spellbook should appear in your profile.

It will, I just wanted to be sure it was ok first.

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none

updated Bluff section:

You confuse those who cleave to notions of morality as unwavering pillars that all are chained to. You project the expected habits and mannerisms those trying to read you expect. Whenever another character attempts to discern your alignment, loyalties, or intentions (including via magical effects such as [detect thoughts, detect alignment, or Sense Motive you may roll a bluff after a successful Will saving throw to resist such effects at the same DC or to oppose Sense Motive. If you succeed you may alter the reading subtley. The result can not deceive by more than one alignment step or one level of aura power. For instance a successful Bluff vs detect thoughts will give the reader the impression that you are behaving more or less ethically than you are in a manner of your choosing. This can only adjust the readers interpretation by a single alignment step, for instance you can not convince them that you are acting Lawful Good when you are in fact acting Chaotic or Evil, but you could increase or reduce the power of your aura of a detect evil by a step, or persuade someone that your actions are more from a sense of balance than good.

On the Neutral Completion Benefit, I think part of it is the word "or" between Holy and Profane should have been "and." Think of it as torn between good and evil and read it with and in there.

Original Neutral completion benefit tweaked:

Completion Benefit: You are now so torn between good and evil you are now an open book to those who know you or study you. You no longer can manipulate alignment or thought reading. You can no longer deceive detect good or detect evil spells, detect thoughts returns a conflicted mess that reveals all of your secrets and struggles. Alignment damage now fuels you instead of harms you. You heal from Holy and Profane damage the way an undead heals from negative energy. The alignment damage sets your anger and hatred afire, but your mind internalizes that fire in a way that heals your soul. This does not affect negative or positive energy, they still heal and harm as they would any other creature of your type.

Broader Neutral completion benefit:

Completion Benefit: You are now so torn between good and evil you are now an open book to those who know you or study you. You no longer can manipulate alignment or thought reading. You can no longer deceive detect good or detect evil spells, detect thoughts returns a conflicted mess that reveals all of your secrets and struggles. You are affected by Good and Evil effects as though you were the opposite of the alignment you started this feat with. If you were good Holy effects harm you as though you were evil and evil effects benefit you. This only affects holy and profane. Positive and Negative energy still work normally based on your type.

Spellbook added to profile


Ok, so as far as an alchemist, here is what I could throw together on the bus to work:

Human Beastmorph Alchemist

Str: 18 Dex: 12 Con: 14 Int: 14 Wis: 12 Cha: 12

Skills (4+human+int=7/lvl + free craft skill ranks)
Craft (Alchemy)
Nature
Perception
Survival
Heal
+3 skills, but will need to fiddle with traits before choosing

Feats
1 Toughness
B Skill Focus (Perception)
3 Weapon Focus (Claws)

Discoveries
2 Feral Mutagen

That’s all I’ve got time for. I envision him as an esteemed veterinarian with political ambitions and an alchemical curiosity. Does this cover more bases for the party than the inquisitor? Seems to have more skills that we didn’t have, but the switch hitting aspect is now more just straight melee with bombs when that isn’t the best choice.


I will update tonight but my new Oracle has more room for knowledge as well. I can do religion and planes at least.


@ gummy, unless I’m crazy you seem to have a 26 point buy?

Sovereign Court

@Zenizar: I'm still a little confused at parts. How about rewriting the feat for just an evil character turning good?


Neutral Male Human Ranger 1 | Speed 30 ft. | AC 18, T 12, FF 16 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +1 | Init +2 | Percep +5 {+7 vs humans}| CMD 15 | Conditions: none

@ Gummy - the alchemist will definitely bring more versatility to the party. Your stats are off, I don’t think you need to sell out for strength, your mutagen can bridge the gap. If you want to keep your strength high this might be one of the few instances where the alternate human racial trait dual talent would be worth it.

S: 16+2, D: 12 C:14 I: 14+2 W:10 Ch: 8

From you description he sounds like he may be better with animals to justify a slight dump in charisma and take a trait that substitutes Int for cha on one social skill.

Alternatively

S: 14+2, D: 13 C:14 I: 14+2 W:12 Ch: 10

Anyway, the only areas I see the Inquisitor being superior are social encounters, buffing, & healing others. An alchemist has to spend a discovery to share Extracts to be on par with the inquisitor on the last two points.


Thinking no dual cursed, because I would have to watch every single post every day to try to use the immediate reroll well

@GM - would Pei Zin Practitioner (Oracle archetype) be approved?


3 people marked this as a favorite.

@alchemist discussion

And don’t worry about healing others imma have that LOCKED


My bad, cha should be 7 not 12!

I do like having int and str at a 16, so I'll move the +2 from str into int instead. Latest build out:

Human Beastmorph Alchemist
Comprehensive Education (all knowledges are class skills, current class skills instead get +1)
Focused Study
Traits - Seeker, Precise Treatment (heal uses int)

Str: 16 Dex: 12 Con: 14 Int: 16 Wis: 12 Cha: 7

Skills (4+int=7/lvl + free craft skill)
Craft (Alchemy) 7
Appraise 7
Nature 8
Perception 8
Heal 7
Planes 7
Local 7
History 7

Feats
1 Toughness
B Skill Focus (Perception)
3 Weapon Focus (Claws)
5 Power Attack
7 Improved Initiative
8 Skill Focus (???)
9 Iron Will

Discoveries
2 Feral Mutagen
4 Preserve Organs
6 Wings
8 Preserve Organs
10 Mummification

At least for what I envision with the alchemist being a vet, the animals don't need to like him (obviously that helps in the real world, but we aren't playing vet simulator, right? ;P), he just needs to be good at doing it. His business model to date would be focused on saving Princess Fluff Ballington XI's life, rather than making sure she is comfortable coming back. To that end, he has good nature and healing. The rest in terms of skills fills out some holes we have, but easily could be related to his business or curiosity/prior formal education. I wanted some sort of social skill, but to get it off of int AND a class skill would have taken both traits.

In combat, he is going for natural attacks. That doesn't always age exceptionally well, but he isn't the only melee fighter and could always swing a weapon if needed. Discoveries improve his durability or make him better at what he needs to do. Feats are sort of all over the place, but with very little actually needed, I chose some useful but boring feats.

Sovereign Court

Wingnut20x6 wrote:
@GM - would Pei Zin Practitioner (Oracle archetype) be approved?

Possibly, but probably not. I'd want a really good answer to why someone from Tian Xia is living in Taldor, let alone interested enough in its politics to devote his life to the country.


@GM -Solid question. My next question honestly was going to be if we could keep the mechanics, but re-skin it. Character definitely not from Tian Xia

I will PM you my idea for the backstory


Neutral Male Human Ranger 1 | Speed 30 ft. | AC 18, T 12, FF 16 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +1 | Init +2 | Percep +5 {+7 vs humans}| CMD 15 | Conditions: none

@Gummy - looks good. The only suggestion I would make is it my be a good idea to have a way for your bombs to do another type of damage. Fire resistance is common.

Dark Archive

NE Male Human Enchanter 1 | AC 11, T 11, FF 10 | hp 6/6 | Fort +0, Ref +1, Will +2 | Init +1 | Perc +0, SM +5 | CMD 11| Spells 3/3 | Conditions: none

Ok, Story Feat has been scrapped and replaced. Character is complete, Backstory is sent to GM...

I am ready when everyone else is.


Just going to see whether I'm a vanilla Life oracle, or archetype, will have finished by tomorrow hopefully. Then will also be ready to start when others are!


Neutral Male Human Ranger 1 | Speed 30 ft. | AC 18, T 12, FF 16 | hp 13/13 | Fort +4, Ref +4, Will +1 | Init +2 | Percep +5 {+7 vs humans}| CMD 15 | Conditions: none

I just need to decide on where to place my skill focus or if I should go another direction and take something combat related. If I go skill focus I’m leaning toward disable device.

Thoughts?


Disable wouldn't be the worst choice


Disable device can be quite useful. Do you have a way of dealing with magical traps too? Otherwise, depending on the AP, it might feel less useful. I've two characters that have invested in the skill without having the ability to disarm magical traps. Through chance, one was a complete waste of skill points, the other saw pleeeenty of use for it!

One possible work around is the spell Aram Zey's Focus, but would certainly need approval.

With all the feedback I've received, I'll get the profile set up and a backstory sent to the GM today! Then I will be ready to play.

EDIT: I'll actually wait for GM Granta to get a chance to look it over first.


The Urban Ranger gets trapfinding at 3rd like a rogue :)

651 to 700 of 913 << first < prev | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Online Campaigns / Play-by-Post Discussion / GM Granta's AP Planning - Discussion All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.