Kitsune, Fox Shape, Improved Familiar (Sprite)


Pathfinder Society

1 to 50 of 56 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Liberty's Edge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

Doubtful combat effectiveness aside, does anyone see a problem with the following that would prevent it from be usable in PFS organized play?

- Kitsune race
- Fox Shape and Improved Familiar feats
- Sprite familiar riding me, shooting a diminutive shortbow

Sovereign Court 5/5 5/55/5

You could, but it would be a bad idea. You'd be going on the Sprite's initiative (+3), and he'd be shooting for a d2-4 without any ranged combat feats. If that would double your combat effectiveness, then you miiiiight have some unrelated problems.

But no, there's nothing preventing you from using that character concept.

Liberty's Edge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

I suppose I could mitigate some of the combat effectiveness issues with a Carnivalist rogue and an Eldritch Guardian fighter multiclass. Then the sprite will get all my combat feats and could do sneak attack damage. *twang!*

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

This sounds glorious. ^_^

Silver Crusade 2/5 *

1 person marked this as a favorite.

You also have an issue getting gear for the sprite...in a home game it would be awesome but since there is no crafting you can't get a diminuative +1 composite longbow...unless it is on a chronicle.

5/5 5/55/55/5

Tamec wrote:
You also have an issue getting gear for the sprite...in a home game it would be awesome but since there is no crafting you can't get a diminuative +1 composite longbow...unless it is on a chronicle.

I can't find a ruling to interpret that way.

PCs can always buy weapons and equipment off their
Chronicle sheets and the approved equipment lists for
their size so long as their size is Small or Medium. Thus,
if a Chronicle sheet offers a Small PC the opportunity
to purchase a +1 frost longsword, she can always buy the
1 frost longsword at size Small.

That takes a diminutive +1 composite longbow off of the always available list, but not afaik off the fame list.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

There are no rules, in any legal PFS source, for pricing out weapons of sizes smaller than Small or Larger than Large.

They were removed from the CRB after the transition from 3.5.

If you want any weapons Tiny or smaller, or Huge or larger, you'll need to find them on a Chronicle Sheet.

As of now I only know of one such Chronicle, and that only grants access to Huge-sized weapons.

Edit: and, before anyone offers the GMG as a solution, none of the items from the GameMastery Guide are legal, either.

Liberty's Edge

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Nefreet wrote:
If you want any weapons Tiny or smaller, or Huge or larger, you'll need to find them on a Chronicle Sheet.

What about the "Resizing" weapon special ability from the Giant Hunter's Handbook, or a couple doses of "Iron Lord's Transforming Slivers" from Inner Sea Gods? Ta-da?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I am not familiar with either of those, so perhaps?

You just can't purchase weapons beyond those sizes.

If your options are legal, care to provide a quote or link?

Liberty's Edge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

Resizing weapon:

Giant Hunter's Handbook wrote:
A resizing weapon instantly shrinks or grows to suit the size of any creature that picks it up unless it is currently wielded by another creature. It reverts to its original size 1 round after it leaves its wielder’s possession.

Iron Lord's Transforming Silvers:

Inner Sea Gods wrote:
The metal filings within this pouch are a mixture of adamantine, cold iron, mithral, and steel. The filings are faintly magnetic and stick to ferrous metal but are easily wiped away. If a metal or partly metal weapon is covered in the entire contents of the pouch and placed in a hot forge overnight, it slowly grows or shrinks by one size category toward the size of the creature who applied the powder. For example, a Small +1 longsword coated with the filings by a Medium creature transforms into a Medium +1 longsword. This transformation is permanent. The pouch contains enough material to transform one weapon, regardless of size.

So maybe not on a bow in the case of the latter. But both these items are within page ranges stipulated as legal on the Additional Resources document.

Update: And as a sustainable daily cast, there's the 24-hour-duration "Resize Item" spell:

Giant Hunter's Handbook wrote:
You alter a magic weapon or suit of armor to be up to two size categories larger or smaller. If the spell on a resized suit of armor ends while the armor is being worn, the armor falls off harmlessly. If the spell would cause an item to grow too large for the area containing it, its growth halts just before that point.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

Wouldn't it just be a link to Additional Resources? I'm pretty sure that's where you go to determine that options are legal.

EDIT: Or that, I suppose. ^_^

EDIT EDIT: Your tag's open...

5/5 5/55/55/5

Nefreet wrote:
There are no rules, in any legal PFS source, for pricing out weapons of sizes smaller than Small or Larger than Large.

Why do they need special prices?

.

Quote:
If you want any weapons Tiny or smaller, or Huge or larger, you'll need to find them on a Chronicle Sheet.

Why would they not be available with fame?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

BigNorseWolf wrote:
Nefreet wrote:
There are no rules, in any legal PFS source, for pricing out weapons of sizes smaller than Small or Larger than Large.
Why do they need special prices?

They need prices. There aren't any. No such items exist in print to buy. That's the problem. It's not an issue of Fame, it's an issue of not existing.

And this isn't the first time this discussion has come up, either.

But, after reading those two options above, it seems like there's now a way to achieve this.

I'll have to buy those sources.

5/5 5/55/55/5

Nefreet wrote:


They need prices. There aren't any. No such items exist in print to buy. That's the problem. It's not an issue of Fame, it's an issue of not existing.

What makes you think that different sized items have different prices?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

What makes you think they don't?

Neither of us can answer that question without something in print.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Nefreet wrote:


They need prices. There aren't any. No such items exist in print to buy. That's the problem. It's not an issue of Fame, it's an issue of not existing.

What makes you think that different sized items have different prices?

Core Rulebook, Equipment chapter wrote:
This cost is the same for a Small or Medium version of the weapon. A Large version costs twice the listed price.

We can make reasonable inferences for costs/prices outside the explicitly-provided ones, but that perhaps won't fly for PFS organized play.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

It actually seems pretty clear, in BNW's favor.

I can't find anything in the CRB that says that weapons of extreme size have a different cost. So a Colossal or Diminutive longsword still costs 15 gp, logic nonwithstanding. ^_^

EDIT: Tarpeius is a better searcher than I. I defer to his wisdom. <3

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Developers have commented on this before.

In home games, inference is easy. Just utilize the price adjustments for unusual armor.

In PFS, such items must be in print.

But, after describing that weapon enchantment, I kind of want to do a similar build ^^.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Oh, WOW, actually, this solves the problem of my Lyrakien and Quasit Familiars being unable to wield tiny-sized reach weapons to threaten adjacent.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

Nefreet wrote:

Developers have commented on this before.

In home games, inference is easy. Just utilize the price adjustments for unusual armor.

In PFS, such items must be in print.

But, after describing that weapon enchantment, I kind of want to do a similar build ^^.

Could you provide a link to these comments? It would be useful to reference when these debates happen. ^_^

Grand Lodge 2/5

Eldritch Guardian archetype. Kitsune with Fox shape at level 3. Improved Familiar Sprite at 5. You lose your first fighter bonus feats and have assigned 2/3 feats by 5th level. I'm not sure gold cost of weapon and the special saddle for you. It's doable but might need to wait until 7th level to get improved familiar just for more archery feats and gold before hand.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Go with Beast-Bonded Witch to give your Sprite Mounted Combat Feats ^^.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Kalindlara wrote:
Could you provide a link to these comments? It would be useful to reference when these debates happen. ^_^

No reference really necessary, and it was nothing official, just history of why they were never printed.

If someone claims they bought a diminutive-sized weapon, just ask them what source they found them in.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

Nefreet wrote:
Kalindlara wrote:
Could you provide a link to these comments? It would be useful to reference when these debates happen. ^_^

No reference really necessary, and it was nothing official, just history of why they were never printed.

If someone claims they bought a diminutive-sized weapon, just ask them what source they found them in.

I'm not necessarily looking for anything official. ^_^

I just wanted to see those comments, in their original context/phrasing/etc. It's helpful when trying to learn about how the developers see the system.

1/5

Dang, guess I wasn't the only one playing around with a concept like this. ;)

Thanks for pointing out those weapon size changing options. The best I had come up with was the Transformative weapon property. Your options are quite a bit cheaper. (although I wonder if Iron Lord's Transforming Silvers would be subject to the PFS clause about magic not persisting after the end of a scenario)

Scarab Sages 1/5 5/5 ** Contributor

I think the main question here is if the Sprite already has the shortbow to begin with, and if so, can it be upgraded as normal. See: masterwork transformation and then pay for bigger bonuses.

I would think, in our adherence to by-the-book, that the sprite DOES have the shortbow (and a short sword!), but this raises another problem.

Ammunition.

Resizing arrows are your friend! Sadly, resize item only does one arrow at a time, and 25 gp a pop at that.

That said, seconding the notion of it using a lance and spirited charge instead. ^^

1/5

Presumably the Sprite brings its own tiny arrows with it, as it has a Short Bow in its stat block... but yeah, ammunition does raise an interesting question. One which is avoided by using a melee weapon.

3/5 5/5

If not, invest in a wand of abundant ammunition and a cracked vibrant purple prism ioun stone. Store the spell in the ioun stone so your familiar can use it.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

There's some debate about the ability to use a wand to charge up the Ioun Stone.

Depends on your definition of "cast".

Personally, I do not allow wands to do it, but a scroll (or actually casting the spell) works just fine.


Nefreet wrote:

There's some debate about the ability to use a wand to charge up the Ioun Stone.

Depends on your definition of "cast".

Personally, I do not allow wands to do it, but a scroll (or actually casting the spell) works just fine.

Why would you not allow wands to do it? The first sentence of Spell Trigger is: Spell trigger activation is similar to spell completion, but it is even simpler. This means that they will have the same result. Therefore they can be used for the charging of an Ioun Stone interchangeably.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

Partially because of the rules for the Ring of Spell Storing, which the Ioun Stone references, and that scrolls are called out as compatible but wands are not.

Partially because of past debates I've had about Magi and Wand Wielder.

I used to be more on your side, but I think the arguments today don't add up to wands being compatible with Spell Storing items.

But I also recognize some GMs do, and some don't, so it's just a matter of table variance. At least disallowing it isn't crucial to anyone's build (or shouldn't be).

Grand Lodge 2/5

So what familiars would be familiars that can wield weapons?

1/5 * RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I don't understand what the OP is trying to do here. Why would a sprite need to ride you when they have a fly speed of 60 and don't get iterative attacks? Why would you need to be a feral fox in order to have them ride you?

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

I think the idea is to give the sprite full attacks while moving.

Grand Lodge

Tarpeius wrote:

Doubtful combat effectiveness aside, does anyone see a problem with the following that would prevent it from be usable in PFS organized play?

- Kitsune race
- Fox Shape and Improved Familiar feats
- Sprite familiar riding me, shooting a diminutive shortbow

Yeah, your fellow tablemates realizing that they have to deal with a party member who's determined to make himself useless because he thinks he's got a "cool" idea.

You're part of a team. PFS character ideas should reflect that mentality. Unless you're planning on restricting this to breaking the ice at social events.

5/5 5/55/55/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.
LazarX wrote:


You're part of a team. PFS character ideas should reflect that mentality. Unless you're planning on restricting this to breaking the ice at social events.

I think you'd have to see it in play or at least a full build before making that rather harsh judgement.

1/5

Nefreet wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Nefreet wrote:
There are no rules, in any legal PFS source, for pricing out weapons of sizes smaller than Small or Larger than Large.
Why do they need special prices?

They need prices. There aren't any. No such items exist in print to buy. That's the problem. It's not an issue of Fame, it's an issue of not existing.

This has been a topic that has interested me in the past and I do not think it has actually been formally cleared up.

The cost of weapons outside of the small-medium-large trilogy is easy to deduce by the established pattern - you just keep dividing or multiplying by two to find the new price. However, because the guide is not explicit, there are many who say this is "illegal". However (again), because the prices are easily extrapolated, are non-game breaking (as far as I can see), and even make reasonable sense within the fictional world of Golarion (why wouldn't a blacksmith take a contract to make a mundane huge longsword for four times the cost of a medium one?), there are others who say it is fine.

I understand the arguments and the firmly stated opinions for and against the purchase of strangely sized weapons (so - no need to pummel me with them), but I have never seen an 'official' ruling beyond forum opinion. If one were made that would be swell. As for now - expect table variation.

1/5 * RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

FLite wrote:
I think the idea is to give the sprite full attacks while moving.

Sprites do practically no damage.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Cyrad wrote:
FLite wrote:
I think the idea is to give the sprite full attacks while moving.
Sprites do practically no damage.

I didn't say it was a good idea.

maybe he bought it poisoned arrows?

Grand Lodge

FLite wrote:
Cyrad wrote:
FLite wrote:
I think the idea is to give the sprite full attacks while moving.
Sprites do practically no damage.

I didn't say it was a good idea.

maybe he bought it poisoned arrows?

Then both the master and the sprite would have to repeatedly check against poisoning themselves, as neither have poison use as a class feature.

5/5 5/55/55/5

Cyrad wrote:
FLite wrote:
I think the idea is to give the sprite full attacks while moving.
Sprites do practically no damage.

With a regular bow, no. But you put enough enchantments and buffs on it, combine it with a spring attacking pc mount, and you could be looking at a reasonably competent combatant.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tabletop Giant wrote:
Nefreet wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Nefreet wrote:
There are no rules, in any legal PFS source, for pricing out weapons of sizes smaller than Small or Larger than Large.
Why do they need special prices?

They need prices. There aren't any. No such items exist in print to buy. That's the problem. It's not an issue of Fame, it's an issue of not existing.

This has been a topic that has interested me in the past and I do not think it has actually been formally cleared up.

The cost of weapons outside of the small-medium-large trilogy is easy to deduce by the established pattern - you just keep dividing or multiplying by two to find the new price. However, because the guide is not explicit, there are many who say this is "illegal". However (again), because the prices are easily extrapolated, are non-game breaking (as far as I can see), and even make reasonable sense within the fictional world of Golarion (why wouldn't a blacksmith take a contract to make a mundane huge longsword for four times the cost of a medium one?), there are others who say it is fine.

I understand the arguments and the firmly stated opinions for and against the purchase of strangely sized weapons (so - no need to pummel me with them), but I have never seen an 'official' ruling beyond forum opinion. If one were made that would be swell. As for now - expect table variation.

It's easy to extrapolate the cost of Mithral Celestial Armor, and yet that is not legal, either.

The "official" ruling you're looking for would be the lack of rules printed anywhere.

Until someone can find any, this shouldn't be up for table variation.

Grand Lodge 2/5

claudekennilol wrote:
So what familiars would be familiars that can wield weapons?

Anyone?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

claudekennilol wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
So what familiars would be familiars that can wield weapons?
Anyone?

Outsiders are proficient with all simple and martial weapons.

Grand Lodge 2/5

Nefreet wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
So what familiars would be familiars that can wield weapons?
Anyone?
Outsiders are proficient with all simple and martial weapons.

Are there any non-improved familiars that are outsiders (or any non-improved familiars that can use weapons via other means)?

1/5

Nefreet wrote:


The "official" ruling you're looking for would be the lack of rules printed anywhere.

As I said in my post - I understand the reasoning you are using for your opinion. I just do not find it persuasive. Repeating your opinion will not make it more persuasive. People are allowed to disagree.

Until there is a formal ruling on this particular matter, I consider it open.

Grand Lodge

claudekennilol wrote:
Nefreet wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
So what familiars would be familiars that can wield weapons?
Anyone?
Outsiders are proficient with all simple and martial weapons.
Are there any non-improved familiars that are outsiders (or any non-improved familiars that can use weapons via other means)?

No.

1/5

claudekennilol wrote:
Are there any non-improved familiars that are outsiders (or any non-improved familiars that can use weapons via other means)?

I am very doubting it. I dug pretty deep into this for Tabletop Giant. I think it's all animals and dinosaurs in there.

Silver Crusade 3/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Tabletop Giant wrote:
Nefreet wrote:


The "official" ruling you're looking for would be the lack of rules printed anywhere.

As I said in my post - I understand the reasoning you are using for your opinion. I just do not find it persuasive. Repeating your opinion will not make it more persuasive. People are allowed to disagree.

Until there is a formal ruling on this particular matter, I consider it open.

I am afraid Nefreet is correct on this. Here is the formal ruling. It is from the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play, v6.

GtPFSOP, v6., p. 22 wrote:
PCs can always buy weapons and equipment off their Chronicle sheets and the approved equipment lists for their size so long as their size is Small or Medium. Thus, if a Chronicle sheet offers a Small PC the opportunity to purchase a +1 frost longsword, she can always buy the 1 frost longsword at size Small. Items found while playing the scenario, however, are the size they are when they’re found. The size can only be adjusted up or down after the scenario is over, while the PCs are buying new gear. PCs purchasing equipment at sizes other than Small and Medium must adjust the prices per the existing weapon size rules (Core Rulebook 144).

(Highlight and emphasis in the last line, mine.)

There are no existing weapon pricing rules for sizes Tiny, Diminutive, Fine, Huge, Gargantuan, or Colossal weapons.

All we know is that Large weapons cost double the cost of Medium weapons, and Small and Medium weapons cost the same.

You want to extrapolate. So far the pattern of multipliers is ..., 1, 1, 2, ... Here's my extrapolation:
..., 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8.

You are right, there should be rules on this. There are not. For PFS we cannot make up the rules that we want to have. For our home games, we can. In my home game, Tiny and smaller weapons are available, for instance—they cost the same as Medium weapons, but any special materials used to create them cost less. I can't use those rules in PFS.

1 to 50 of 56 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Kitsune, Fox Shape, Improved Familiar (Sprite) All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.