Physical Characteristics


Pathfinder Society


I'm curious; didn't see it in the books, I apologize if I overlooked it...

Are the suggested height/weight, hair/eye color, etc. hard requirements in PFS?

One of my repeat characters throughout the various systems I have played is an oversized human, of dubious and multiple lineages, but instead of 1/8 this and 1/16 that and 1/2 the other, he is just a human overall. He is taller than most humans, though the max height would work; however he is more than double the typical maximum weight, as a grossly obese man, with the blubber hiding thick layers of well developed muscle (and also a denser than standard bone structure).

It makes for some fun times with mounts, etc., and is fun to rollplay for various reasons. His various incarnations have had multiple explanations for his background and class choices, but he is a recurring theme for me, that I would like to recreate in PFS.

Typically, I would have him stand around 7' or so, give or take a few inches, and be between 600 and 1,000 pounds (depending on his strength that incarnation; muscle does weigh roughly 8 times the same volume of fat, after all).

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **

Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber

The only restriction I am aware is on Age. Pg 7 in the PFS Guide.

A character can not be younger than the minimum age listed, and must be younger than venerable. A character that ages past venerable, for whatever reason, dies of old age and is removed from the campaign. Characters do not alter their ability scores as a result of this choice.

That said, if you are unreasonable in your selection of physical stats off the chart (15' tall human) you may be called out on it. So stay reasonable.


Right, I am sure some might think of 7' and 750 pounds (give or take a couple inches, and give or take a few hundred pounds) as unreasonable.

But as there exist living people in our world today that exceed both figures, I see it as unusual, but very possible.

And as I said, I love to play it up, and enrich it with a lot of flavor - it isn't a mechanical thing, after all; and have never yet had anyone (aside from one 4E DM, who loved to complain about anything and everything that wasn't boring and stereotypical, so I don't count him) who questioned it or complained about it.

Just making sure it is legal.

4/5

Generally speaking, you're fine as long as you don't receive any mechanical benefits.

So if a creature grapples you and moves you, you don't get to start asking if it's strong enough to lift 750lbs.

If something is flying overhead, you don't get to say your 3ft sword plus your 7ft height gives you 10ft of reach.

You don't get a "size bonus" on your Intimidate checks against other, lesser Medium-sized creatures.

etc.

Or you just could make a City-Raised Half-Orc with the Pass for Human Feat.

Sovereign Court 5/5

Table 7-3 on pg 170 of the Core Rule Book talks about height & weight. I don't know how that affects what you can do in society play but your character is somewhat outside of the ranges from that table.


Todd Lower wrote:
Table 7-3 on pg 170 of the Core Rule Book talks about height & weight. I don't know how that affects what you can do in society play but your character is somewhat outside of the ranges from that table.

That is specifically what I was asking, Todd, if it is legal to deviate from those standards. So far, the answer has been, "Yes (within reason), as long as no mechanical benefits are gained"

5/5

Be a tall bloatmage! Make it work mechanically! :D

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

There's a Sczarni character played by one of our Golden State VOs that tips the scales around 500 pounds. I recall him saying that was the heaviest a human could be in PFS. FWIW.

If you played at my table, I'd probably ask that your character be within the guidelines set forth for each race. I mean, really, is there any difference between roleplaying as a 500 pound character, and a 750 pound character?


Nefreet wrote:

There's a Sczarni character played by one of our Golden State VOs that tips the scales around 500 pounds. I recall him saying that was the heaviest a human could be in PFS. FWIW.

If you played at my table, I'd probably ask that your character be within the guidelines set forth for each race. I mean, really, is there any difference between roleplaying as a 500 pound character, and a 750 pound character?

Well, even 500 is more than double the suggested maximum weight... and a 220 pound character is hard to play as morbidly obese... (unless he was, say, 3' tall)

The Exchange

There is (or was when I last watched it years ago) a sumo yokozuna that was almost that big. he was an absolute monster, scary how easily he could man-handle guys over 500 lbs..

5/5 5/55/5 *** Venture-Captain, Germany—Hamburg

redward wrote:
Generally speaking, you're fine as long as you don't receive any mechanical benefits.

That's what I'd say, too.

IMO, it's always better to have such a character at the table and have all the players imagine how incredibly fat the character is and what he would look like (which would result in some fun moments at the table) than just having a bunch of normally-built boring characters.

Of course, as it had been said already, NPCs could move him around just as easily as they could any other character.
(Just imagine a thin, agile elf push around that fat heavy guy. That would surely create a fun mood at the table ;) )


1 person marked this as a favorite.
karossii wrote:
muscle does weigh roughly 8 times the same volume of fat, after all.

Where did you get that (wrong) piece of information? Fat is about 0.94 g/cm3, muscle tissue is 1.05 g/cm3, that's a difference of 12%.

If muscle tissue weighed 8 times more than fat, it'd be at 7.5 g/cm3...

Iron is at 7.8 g/cm3. Olympic swimmers would sink like anchors if you were right.

Sovereign Court 5/5

Cpt. Caboodle wrote:
karossii wrote:
muscle does weigh roughly 8 times the same volume of fat, after all.

Where did you get that (wrong) piece of information? Fat is about 0.94 g/cm3, muscle tissue is 1.05 g/cm3, that's a difference of 12%.

If muscle tissue weighed 8 times more than fat, it'd be at 7.5 g/cm3...

Iron is at 7.8 g/cm3. Olympic swimmers would sink like anchors if you were right.

You're right of course, but most athletes with low body fat can't float anyway. What does water weigh anyway?

Edit: Oh yeah, 1.00 g/cm3 at a certain temp. Now I remember.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

I would be very reluctant to allow that character. Even 500 lbs you are talking about a lot of house rules being needed.

Encumberance effects?
Alterations to the Squeeze rules?
Penalties to being grappled?
Penalties to being Bullrushed?
Penalties to going down a narrow set of stairs next to a wall over a pit?

Also there could easily be areas where the character simply can't continue the adventure. (The party descends a hemp rope. What is the weight rating of the rope. If it's less than 500, how do they get him down there?)

Grand Lodge 2/5

Neat, you're a human who's tall (with no extra reach) and heavy (with no mechanical changes). Why would anyone have any problem with this?

Why would GM's get upset about "color" surrounding a character? As long as there are no mechanical changes, the character could be the worlds tallest dwarf, or fattest halfling, or the elf lord with the pointiest ears.

Grand Lodge 2/5 RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

Lanith wrote:

Neat, you're a human who's tall (with no extra reach) and heavy (with no mechanical changes). Why would anyone have any problem with this?

Why would GM's get upset about "color" surrounding a character? As long as there are no mechanical changes, the character could be the worlds tallest dwarf, or fattest halfling, or the elf lord with the pointiest ears.

1) Folks aren't always confident that a player is totally cool with gaining absolutely positively zero mechanical advantage for making such a character.

2) Some folks' fun is greatly diminished by the presence of a character (or monster, or item, or whatever) whose description and mechanics are a glaring contradiction. See also: fitting longbow arrows into a wrist sheath, and giant snakes taking up square-shaped spaces.


Jiggy wrote:
Lanith wrote:

Neat, you're a human who's tall (with no extra reach) and heavy (with no mechanical changes). Why would anyone have any problem with this?

Why would GM's get upset about "color" surrounding a character? As long as there are no mechanical changes, the character could be the worlds tallest dwarf, or fattest halfling, or the elf lord with the pointiest ears.

1) Folks aren't always confident that a player is totally cool with gaining absolutely positively zero mechanical advantage for making such a character.

2) Some folks' fun is greatly diminished by the presence of a character (or monster, or item, or whatever) whose description and mechanics are a glaring contradiction. See also: fitting longbow arrows into a wrist sheath, and giant snakes taking up square-shaped spaces.

Well, for #1, I have never pushed for or asked for any mechanical adjustments (penalties or benefits) due to his size; but both have been handed to me by various DMs in various systems. I am personally fine with nothing but flavor, and willing to accept whatever may come at the table.

For two, there are different people with different preferences. I only ask about the rules, because frankly, I don't care all that much* what you prefer I do or don't do - it is better to find out we have different likes and end up at different tables, than for one of us to cramp our enjoyment and preferred style for the other. So as long as the rules allow it, if I want to do it, I will.

*I do not mean that I am pushy or try to force others to do as I wish, only that, as long as I am within the rules, I will do as I wish. If it turns out I am in the minority at a table, I will either move, or do my best to have fun while upsetting as few people as possible, as little as possible. We're all there to have fun, and we should *all* have fun.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I'm sorry, I must have missed the answer to my question from earlier.

Is there any difference between roleplaying as a 500 pound character, and a 750 pound character? They are both enormous and send the same message to npcs and other players at the table.

At a certain point I feel like people are pushing the rules just to push the rules.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Well, much as I *hate* BMI as a measure (I think it is a crude tool for measuring anything beyond broad statistical trends) it is really the only tool we have that we can apply to the character above without knowing a lot more. At 500 lbs and 7 feet tall, the character would have a BMI of ~50, and would be classified as off the end of the scale for "Super obesity" (That is beyond morbidly obese.) To put that in perspective, most Sumo wrestlers weigh in around 300-400, and Japan is trying to get them to cut down (because they have a life expectancy 10 years shorter than average.) In otherwords, you are pretty much beyond the scale where anyone would ever consider you healthy, and well into high level bloat mage territory.

at 750, you are carrying around half again as much weight. That is, for me, beyond the realm of suspension of disbelief for an adventuring character. We are talking about the point where you stop being able to move under your own power or fit through doorways.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Some further number crunchyness:

A 18 strength human has the leg strength to lift 520 lbs (max human weight + max lifting weight.)

you would need 22 str for your legs to lift 740 lbs. At which point you would still be encumbered.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

by the way, under the Pathfinder System:

tallest human: 78 inches
tallest elf: 80 inches
tallest half orc: 82 inches

your character: 84 inches.

Why does his mongrel heritage mean he needs to be taller than all of the tallest people in any of his heritages.

Average human: 69 inches
Average elf: 72 inches
Average Orc: 71 inches

All three races are within about 3 inches of each other.


Self edited before even posting. As I did my typical preview scan to check for spelling errors, I realized I was thinking I was in another thread, in which I provided much more specific details about this character. Rather than delete and rewrite most of what I have written, I will apologize in advance if my assumption that you had more information about the character than exists in this thread, caused me to misspeak or make an argument where instead an explanation would have been better. So please take that into account when reading my reply, and accept my apology if the way I said what I say below offends. I would still have come to the same points, but perhaps in a better stated and clearer manner.
Also, please accept my apologies for the laziness to not delete the entire post and rewrite it; I *am* being lazy, and I don't want to do that.

.

Nefreet I did reply, but it was indirect. Basically, when I said even 500 was more than double the standard limit, I intended to imply/indicate that in general, it doesn't matter; but to address your question directly - for this specific character, he is what he is because of a longstanding in-character history saying that is what he is. Which I have detailed fairly well above. So yes, it matters.

Could I roleplay any old fat/obese/extremely large but muscular character as 500 vs. 750 or 1,000 and be fine with it? Sure. Hephalumph, however, has never been that lightweight.

.

Flite, you are assuming a lot of real-world assumptions that do not apply. As his genetic background is so diverse, it includes several species with much denser bones, possibly larger and heavier organs, etc. In short, there comes a point where you either have suspension of disbelief or you do not. If you can see that physically described character, with patches of fur, leathery hide, and normal skin all intertwined across his body, and yet have a problem based on purely modern day real-world human only physiology, then I would hazard a guess you would probably be just as hard pressed to suspend disbelief about the rest of his appearance beyond the weight factor. And if not, I don't understand your mind and how you compartmentalize/suspend disbelief. (Not saying you are wrong in that, just different from me.)

And to pick one specific nit in your suspension of disbelief post - how would it be beyond suspension of disbelief, when there have been several 750+ pound people in the media over the past decade or two, and probably dozens more who didn't make the media? I believe the world record holder almost hit half a ton, but fell just a bit short at 975 or something similar. Especially given that this character is a full foot or more taller than all of those rotund individuals?

As to the requisite strength score. I have never yet seen anyone apply body weight to encumbrance - to my knowledge, it is assumed that your carrying capacity is bodyweight PLUS the stated limits. So he would be technically/legally perfectly fine with a 3 (5 in PFS) strength score, and still able to move himself about just as if he weighed 38 pounds. If you know of absolutely anything indicating otherwise, let's inform all of the players of low strength builds in PFS immediately - it could be a major game changer!

Sarcasm aside, I know you added max human weight plus max lifting capacity - but what if it is a half-orc? Suddenly the 18 strength can support 618, not 520. Or a halfling? That 18 Strength only supports 338 total now! In other words, you are making false assumptions and coming to wrong conclusions.

Now it does certainly make it tough to be a mounted character, or climb a rope, etc. His bodyweight IS a factor then! That is why he has almost always had a pack mule carrying, among other things, a nice length of chain for that specific purpose. And with certain DMs, it creates hilarity when he occasionally forgets most furniture wasn't designed for his size.

And to the last post, would it really be such an issue for you if someone came to a table with a highly flavorful character (say, the world's tallest dwarf, or the world's smallest half-orc), and played something else outside the suggested limits? Or is it the extreme factor of ~ 2-6" in height that is an issue? I note you only addressed height in that post, so...???

It is not the mongrel heritage per se which necessitates his height. It is about two decades plus of character development. Could I play him at 6'4" and 225 pounds? No. I could play a different character who is similar, but it would destroy too much of what makes him the Hephalumph as described above.

As I have described in the first post, he has gone through many incarnations. And he has grown a bit or shrunk a bit across systems. So it is not a single specific height and weight I require. The range, as I listed in the same first post, has been 6'10" to 7'6", and an assumed weight from 600 up to 1,500 pounds, though most commonly he was right at 7' even and about 1,000 pounds. While his classes and specific abilities have changed, his appearance and personality have remained relatively constant.

To sum up my replay lengthy reply to the last 4 posts, in a TLDR; it is my character, that is how I desire him to be based on a very long history, and the answer to my initial question is that; yes, the rules allow for him to be that way.

[edit] Dang it, even with a preview, I missed some spelling. Fixed them all now I think.

5/5 5/55/55/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

The guy that came up with the BMI flunked square cube relations.

The Exchange

Im going to guess you have never been seriously obese. I am right now no less than 350 lbs and I can tell you how much effort it takes to work a physical job and live a normal life at this size. if you think any human twice my size is an option for an adventurer you really need to strap a series of weights to yourself to get to 300 lbs. then grab 50 lbs of gear and walk a mile. now if that doesn't convince you it is a bad idea grab another hundred. Try to think rationally about what you are doing here, I know I am trying to get science in your RPG but this is just too extreme in my view.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Yes, there are people in the media who weigh 750 to 950 lbs.

They are effectively sessile outside a wheelchair. That is a lot of what I am basing my assumptions that this character would not be able to move. They also tend to die very early.

A better example for the limits of human physical size while still being an effective adventurer, your better example is Andre the Giant. 7 feet, 4 inches, 500 lbs. Note that to carry that weight, and remain an effective fighter, he had a high enough strength to pick up other people and throw them for distance, and enough con to drink over 100 beers at a sitting. (body mass helps with that, but only so far.)
He also died at 46 years old.

I assumed human / elf / half orc heritage because those races are pfs legal. I suppose I should have included Assimar and teifling, but if he has assimar or teifling heritage, he should be stated as one of them, as the outsider heritage would change a lot of things.

What you are effectively saying at this point is you want to have your character be a new race (mongrel) with a special power (unaffected by obesity) that allows you to have 3 times the racial max weight. In a home game, I would have less problem with it, but I would also make you pay for the advantages (bonus against bullrush / harder to carry off) offset by the penalties (can't ride most mounts.)

But not really PFS legal.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

FLite wrote:

Some further number crunchyness:

A 18 strength human has the leg strength to lift 520 lbs (max human weight + max lifting weight.)

you would need 22 str for your legs to lift 740 lbs. At which point you would still be encumbered.

FYI, the weights and encumbrances chart for strength does not include your own body weight. It is assumed your own body weight doesn't hamper you.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

There has to be a line drawn somewhere, and for medium-sized creatures it's 500lbs. Your 750lb character is not PFS legal, and if you sat down at my table you'd have to "slim down" first.

If you can claim that 750 is fine, who's to say 751 isn't? Or 801, 901, or 1001? Same thing for height. I see no reason why you have to push the boundaries just to have an enjoyable character.

There's not a lot of competition out there to be the fattest character at the table. I've encountered two Bloatmages in a year, and neither of them were as heavy as the Spring Attacking Sczarni I mentioned earlier. You're more than likely going to be the fattest character at the table. Be happy with that.

And if, somehow, you encounter another character with the same theme in mind, you can both take solace that your combined weight plus gear is over half a ton, and it doesn't have to turn into an OOC battle as to who can push the rules the most.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

Andrew Christian wrote:
FLite wrote:

Some further number crunchyness:

A 18 strength human has the leg strength to lift 520 lbs (max human weight + max lifting weight.)

you would need 22 str for your legs to lift 740 lbs. At which point you would still be encumbered.

FYI, the weights and encumbrances chart for strength does not include your own body weight. It is assumed your own body weight doesn't hamper you.

I am aware of that. But under the rules, it is effectively saying "your body weight, within the racial limits, does not hamper you. I was attempting to extrapolate that to answer the question "if your body weight exceeded the racial max, how much would you have to weigh to be hampered."

Liberty's Edge 5/5

I would say in PFS that it would be advisable to play within the soft limits the rules present.

Table Variation is the key, as some GMs would rule (and they have the right) that your character concept is outside the rules of the game.

I would hate to see an entire character concept have to change because of table variation.

My advice is to create unique inside the box, not so far outside of it that you make reasonable and creative people uncomfortable with your choices.

My opinion is that your choices are so outside the realm of reasonable possibility without creating a new race, that I would not allow it at my table.

While you might not ask for mechanical benefit, other players may have their verisimilitude crushed when your 7' tall guy can't easily reach up 10 to 12 feet.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

FLite wrote:
Andrew Christian wrote:
FLite wrote:

Some further number crunchyness:

A 18 strength human has the leg strength to lift 520 lbs (max human weight + max lifting weight.)

you would need 22 str for your legs to lift 740 lbs. At which point you would still be encumbered.

FYI, the weights and encumbrances chart for strength does not include your own body weight. It is assumed your own body weight doesn't hamper you.
I am aware of that. But under the rules, it is effectively saying "your body weight, within the racial limits, does not hamper you. I was attempting to extrapolate that to answer the question "if your body weight exceeded the racial max, how much would you have to weigh to be hampered."

Ah gotchya.


Andrew R wrote:
Im going to guess you have never been seriously obese. I am right now no less than 350 lbs and I can tell you how much effort it takes to work a physical job and live a normal life at this size. if you think any human twice my size is an option for an adventurer you really need to strap a series of weights to yourself to get to 300 lbs. then grab 50 lbs of gear and walk a mile. now if that doesn't convince you it is a bad idea grab another hundred. Try to think rationally about what you are doing here, I know I am trying to get science in your RPG but this is just too extreme in my view.

At 6'4" tall, in the best shape of my life with very low bodyfat, I was just a hair under 300 pounds. I am now nowhere near as good of shape, with a lot more bodyfat and less muscle mass, and I am ~ 280. At my worst, yes I have been over 300 (but not over 350).

But honestly, that is completely irrelevant. This is a fantasy character, not a physics or biology project.


FLite wrote:

Yes, there are people in the media who weigh 750 to 950 lbs.

They are effectively sessile outside a wheelchair. That is a lot of what I am basing my assumptions that this character would not be able to move. They also tend to die very early.

A better example for the limits of human physical size while still being an effective adventurer, your better example is Andre the Giant. 7 feet, 4 inches, 500 lbs. Note that to carry that weight, and remain an effective fighter, he had a high enough strength to pick up other people and throw them for distance, and enough con to drink over 100 beers at a sitting. (body mass helps with that, but only so far.)
He also died at 46 years old.

I assumed human / elf / half orc heritage because those races are pfs legal. I suppose I should have included Assimar and teifling, but if he has assimar or teifling heritage, he should be stated as one of them, as the outsider heritage would change a lot of things.

What you are effectively saying at this point is you want to have your character be a new race (mongrel) with a special power (unaffected by obesity) that allows you to have 3 times the racial max weight. In a home game, I would have less problem with it, but I would also make you pay for the advantages (bonus against bullrush / harder to carry off) offset by the penalties (can't ride most mounts.)

But not really PFS legal.

Can you point me to where, contrary to the earlier poster's statements, it is PFS illegal? Obviuously I was uncertain in the beginning, or this thread would not have existed; but I have seen nothing to that effect, and have had it confirmed by others.


Nefreet wrote:

There has to be a line drawn somewhere, and for medium-sized creatures it's 500lbs. Your 750lb character is not PFS legal, and if you sat down at my table you'd have to "slim down" first.

If you can claim that 750 is fine, who's to say 751 isn't? Or 801, 901, or 1001? Same thing for height. I see no reason why you have to push the boundaries just to have an enjoyable character.

There's not a lot of competition out there to be the fattest character at the table. I've encountered two Bloatmages in a year, and neither of them were as heavy as the Spring Attacking Sczarni I mentioned earlier. You're more than likely going to be the fattest character at the table. Be happy with that.

And if, somehow, you encounter another character with the same theme in mind, you can both take solace that your combined weight plus gear is over half a ton, and it doesn't have to turn into an OOC battle as to who can push the rules the most.

Where is that 500 pound limit stated? And if you cannot point me to that limit, and refused to allow an otherwise legal character because of your personal tastes/biases/failure to suspend disbelief, I would play at another table (or "slim down" if that were the only option), but II would make sure to go out of my way to report you as a DM for the violation. You do not get to enforce imaginary rules. I will concede the point if this rule does indeed exist, but so far I have seen nothing stating it does.


FLite wrote:
Andrew Christian wrote:
FLite wrote:

Some further number crunchyness:

A 18 strength human has the leg strength to lift 520 lbs (max human weight + max lifting weight.)

you would need 22 str for your legs to lift 740 lbs. At which point you would still be encumbered.

FYI, the weights and encumbrances chart for strength does not include your own body weight. It is assumed your own body weight doesn't hamper you.
I am aware of that. But under the rules, it is effectively saying "your body weight, within the racial limits, does not hamper you. I was attempting to extrapolate that to answer the question "if your body weight exceeded the racial max, how much would you have to weigh to be hampered."

No, under the rules, it is actually saying that your body weight does not hamper you. You are adding in an inferred "within racial limits" that is not expressed in the rules themselves.


Andrew Christian wrote:

I would say in PFS that it would be advisable to play within the soft limits the rules present.

Table Variation is the key, as some GMs would rule (and they have the right) that your character concept is outside the rules of the game.

I would hate to see an entire character concept have to change because of table variation.

My advice is to create unique inside the box, not so far outside of it that you make reasonable and creative people uncomfortable with your choices.

My opinion is that your choices are so outside the realm of reasonable possibility without creating a new race, that I would not allow it at my table.

While you might not ask for mechanical benefit, other players may have their verisimilitude crushed when your 7' tall guy can't easily reach up 10 to 12 feet.

Andrew, this is one of the better arguments. It is why I posted the thread in the first place; to see if it was worth creating the character in PFS at all.

However, if PFS does not require height/weight restrictions (the CRB does not require it, it only offers the typical range, not a hard limit), then I would disagree. The DM is not within their right to enforce a nonexistent rule...

Grand Lodge 2/5 RPG Superstar 2012 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The Core Rulebook contains rules for determining the weight (and height, for that matter) of PCs. Unless PFS makes a specific rule to the contrary in the Guide to Organized Play or the FAQ, all rules in the Core Rulebook are used as-written.

Find a PFS exception, or make a character within the parameters of the Core Rulebook.


Jiggy;

In the CRB, under races, it only lists an average member of that race's height, without weight or ranges. SO obviously there is not restriction there.

Under vital statistics, it only provides a way to randomly generate height/weight - with no listed option for a range to choose from, or to make specific choices. And that is the only method I have seen in the CRB of determining height and weight. So are you saying every character in PFS is required both to;

A) be randomly determined, not purposefully selected
B) match the height and weight exactly (i.e. no overweight or underweight characters, but every human male on Golarion (or at least all PCs) who is 5'5" tall is exactly 155 pounds? And every 6' tall human female is exactly 180 pounds?

In short, that means any 6'1" tall human female is illegal. And any 6'0" tall male who weighs anything outside of 190 pounds precisely is illegal. And any character who selected a specific height and weight combination, rather than randomly determining them, is illegal.

If deviation from that single method presented in the rules is allowed, then deviation is allowed.

Silver Crusade 3/5

karossii wrote:
The DM is not within their right to enforce a nonexistent rule...

Nor is the Player within their right to invoke a nonexistent rule.

Can you provide the rule which allows players to choose ANY height and weight for their characters whatsoever?

Silver Crusade 3/5

http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/additionalRules.html wrote:
The following section determines a character's starting age, height, and weight. The character's race and class influence these statistics. Consult your GM before making a character that does not conform to these statistics.

The GM for PFS is Mike Brock. Please consult with him before making a character that does not conform to these statistics.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

karossii wrote:

Jiggy;

In the CRB, under races, it only lists an average member of that race's height, without weight or ranges. SO obviously there is not restriction there.

Under vital statistics, it only provides a way to randomly generate height/weight - with no listed option for a range to choose from, or to make specific choices. And that is the only method I have seen in the CRB of determining height and weight. So are you saying every character in PFS is required both to;

A) be randomly determined, not purposefully selected
B) match the height and weight exactly (i.e. no overweight or underweight characters, but every human male on Golarion (or at least all PCs) who is 5'5" tall is exactly 155 pounds? And every 6' tall human female is exactly 180 pounds?

In short, that means any 6'1" tall human female is illegal. And any 6'0" tall male who weighs anything outside of 190 pounds precisely is illegal. And any character who selected a specific height and weight combination, rather than randomly determining them, is illegal.

If deviation from that single method presented in the rules is allowed, then deviation is allowed.

Sure deviation is allowed. I would allow someone to sit who didn't fit the exact height and weight ranges. (the range is there in the rules, you just have to extrapolate it based on what the maximum and minimum you can roll on the dice is). I would allow it, if they maybe varied by 5 to say 15 percent. So lets say the maximum weight for a 6'8 half-orc is 300 lbs, that would mean I wouldn't care if you brought a 6'9 half-orc that weighed 335 lbs.

But when your deviation from the accepted norms is over 100 to 200 percent, that's where you go askew for me.

Lets look at monsters for a second, and the average sizes that determine medium to large.

All starting races are small to medium in size. Almost all monsters that are small or medium fall into those ranges. The only one I can think of that specifically does not, is the grippli which is almost tiny sized. My grippli is a big version at 1'10" and 25lbs. But that only deviates from say a gnome or halfling by a few inches and maybe 10 lbs.

Large monsters that are humanoid in nature are typically somewhere between 7' and 12' tall and weight roughly 3 to 4 times what a medium sized creature would weight. So extrapolating a half-orc that was large instead of medium, you could expect maybe 7'2 and 900lbs.

Your description of your mongloid human is a Large creature by all reasonable definitions.

I would allow some deviation, but I would not allow you to bring a Large creature to the table and have you say its only medium with no large mechanics.

In other words, no cake and eating simultaneously.

The Exchange

karossii wrote:
Andrew R wrote:
Im going to guess you have never been seriously obese. I am right now no less than 350 lbs and I can tell you how much effort it takes to work a physical job and live a normal life at this size. if you think any human twice my size is an option for an adventurer you really need to strap a series of weights to yourself to get to 300 lbs. then grab 50 lbs of gear and walk a mile. now if that doesn't convince you it is a bad idea grab another hundred. Try to think rationally about what you are doing here, I know I am trying to get science in your RPG but this is just too extreme in my view.

At 6'4" tall, in the best shape of my life with very low bodyfat, I was just a hair under 300 pounds. I am now nowhere near as good of shape, with a lot more bodyfat and less muscle mass, and I am ~ 280. At my worst, yes I have been over 300 (but not over 350).

But honestly, that is completely irrelevant. This is a fantasy character, not a physics or biology project.

A fantasy character in an RPG where characters are still held to certain rules of biology and physics.

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Physical Characteristics All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Pathfinder Society