Paizo Top Nav Branding
  • Hello, Guest! |
  • Sign In |
  • My Account |
  • Shopping Cart |
  • Help/FAQ
About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ
Wishcraft caster

Cyrad's page

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16. RPG Superstar 7 Season Star Voter, 8 Season Star Voter. Pathfinder Society Member. 3,150 posts (3,361 including aliases). 9 reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 2 Pathfinder Society characters. 1 alias.


RSS

1 to 50 of 3,150 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

KenderKin wrote:

Isn't this thread premature! I have yet to see absolute proof of the martial caster disparity!!!

Lots of opinions, but until the problem is identified proposing solutions is.....

It exists.

Though, I usually don't enjoy discussions about it as I rarely see them as productive. One of my biggest issues with such discussions is that most people approach the problem as a player or a GM, not a game designer. The martial/caster disparity occurs as a result of a game design issue.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Yeah, infernal healing already fills that niche.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Boomerang Nebula wrote:
Cyrad wrote:
Neither really fixes anything, nor addresses the main issues.

How so?

The issue as I see it is that full casters are too powerful and versatile. The system works fine if they only use the full extent of their powers occasionally, but as per the current rules they can do it every day! This trashes the CR system, makes most martial classes pointless, creates silly magic marts, makes most APs too easy and most encounters trivial. Limiting casters improves the overall game.

Because breaking spellcasters such that they become permanently useless after casting X spells in their lifetime or making a rule so you can't play one as a 1st level character sounds like an incredibly unfun approach to mitigating martial/caster disparity. Breaking classes doesn't really fix anything.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Neither really fixes anything, nor addresses the main issues.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

cablop, I think you're getting too hung up on minor things. The Will save is not a big deal. The monk is still good at resisting mind-affecting effects and have tons of abilities that thwart them.

The reason many class features are now ki powers is because many people have different preference on what abilities they want their monk to have. Some want ninjas. Some want wise sages. Some want to do Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon type of stuff. I do agree it's annoying having some of the passive abilities now require ki points. I would have preferred if there were two ki power pools: one for passive powers and one for active powers.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I use Golarion, but I created a couple of my own gods.

My players resurrected one of them. Does that count?

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

How long have you playtested these rules?

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

ARG race builder has flaws, but it does do two things well:
1) It helps show when your race has too high of a scope. If your race has a high RP value, that indicates it may simply have too many abilities.
2) Tier system does a decent job of showing what's appropriate for a PC race and what's too powerful. PC races generally only have standard traits with the occasional well chosen advanced trait.

With this in mind, I'd probably make Telepathy a 4-5 RP advanced trait.

A better alternative to Almost Humanoid is a half-plant. I homebrewed stats for one, but I can't seem to find it!

I'd give Voiceless -1 RP. Most drawbacks can't really have a high RP reduction because they're often situational and it's highly subject to the player's build. For example, a drawback that cripples a race's ability to cast spells is irrelevant if the player uses that race as a non-spellcaster.

A better approach to drawbacks is baking them directly into another trait in order to give it a little more power budget. The android's Constructed is a great example of this. Contructed gives you a ton of bonuses and immunity to fatigue and exhaustion. However, it also makes you immune to morale bonuses, which are the most common party buffs in the game. This also prevents the player from abusing the fatigue immunity to play a barbarian.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Oxylepy wrote:


Yeah, but when it comes down to writing out the abilities that can be selected for a single research path, it's say about 10 options, plus rewriting many of the rules. Then consider that research paths aren't very limited (although some overlap would exist between the abilities and the different paths like Spirits and Undeath would both have an option for something like speak with dead), leading to a list of viable paths I am already kicking around of Undeath, Spirits, Dragons, Fey, Architecture, Death, Life, Light, Shadow, Metal, History, Martial Arts, Music, Nature, Botony... then you're looking at something like 100 or more ability options and craming that into an archetype.
...
I really do get the argument for working off a wizard as a base and treating it as an archetype, but at the same time the space to list out the options is substantial. Strangely even pathfinder chose to redo the entire paladin from scratch for the antipaladin when it was essentially the same class with certain words changed around and a handful of abilities redone.

See, that's why I suggested an archetype or starting your design process with one. I reviewed many homebrew classes. The most common pitfall I see is that the homebrewer strongly believes their concept is too unique for an archetype, despite their idea not having any new mechanics to bring to the table. They make the class have a ridiculously grandiose scope of a 100 abilities planned while not investing any time in other ways to make the class interesting or unique. The ultimate result is either:

A) The homebrewer abandons the project after finishing only 10 to 20 abilities because they couldn't think of any more.

B) The homebrewer finishes the project, but the class becomes an unwieldy mess that's pretty much impossible to balance and fine tune.

In either case, the resulting class looks little more than a grab bag of talents. Classes are much more than that. Even modern classes with a talent pool as a primary class feature do something new, unusual, and cool with it. The shaman, medium, and the occultist are all good examples.

In fact, the occultist would actually make a great base for your concept as it's a class all about studying objects to learn spells and gain abilities. I could see your concept as an occultist that casts arcane spells and uses old spellbooks, tomes, and depleted magical items instead of random objects as implements.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Oxylepy wrote:
I debated it, but ultimately nearly everything that wizards or similar classes get is lost or needs rewritten in order to cover the changes. The specialty school, arcane bond... pretty much the lot. All that is left is a slightly altered skill list, and a table with no class features that needs to be rewritten. Which is about the same starting point a Witch has before filling in similar effects. Even going off her system... everything is scratched and rewritten.

Classes are one of the hardest things to design in this game. Archetypes were deliberately made to make it easier for cases when you don't need to build an entire class. It also sounds like you aren't really sure what you want. At the moment, this sounds more like a specific character concept than a class. I'm not trying to discourage you, but rather illustrate it's vital you have clear, concrete goals and then access them.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

You might be better off creating an archetype since it doesn't look like you have any new mechanics to dedicate a class around.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

A wizard is a dedicated spellcaster that casts spells through study and preparation.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

ErrantPursuit wrote:
Without having a good idea how the character is built it's not easy to offer new pathways to take it. Just spend some time seeing what the player finds interesting now and see how you can fit that in.

She's a Dex-based character with Deadly Agility wielding a katana (houseruled as a finesse weapon). I think the only metamagic she has is Intensify Spell.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ciaran Barnes wrote:
Cyrad wrote:
The problem with alternate drunk rules is that they're often so complicated that no one remembers them and no one will bother busting out the rule books to find out what they are. PF's rules are simple and easily remembered. You can handle a number of drinks equal 1 + your Con modifier. Afterward, you're sickened.
The problem with these rules is that is doesn't really reflect how a person gets smarter, tougher, and better looking the more they drink.

The sickened condition does penalize Perception, Sense Motive, and Charisma/Wisdom checks!

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

TarkXT wrote:

A thing of note that has been changed in the blog to reflect as someone pointed out to me.

The re-rolls are in addition to the flat bonuses. That's so they still interact with feats and abilities that increase or decrease that bonus.

Still prefer normal flat bonuses than rerolling. Rerolling strikes me as too strong.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Darksol the Painbringer wrote:

Guard could do either an Improvised Weapon attack, or an Unarmed Strike (Punch) on the PC. And no, the PC wouldn't be flat-footed or anything because he's aware of the guard's presence.

But inflicting automatic damage, even a small amount, isn't really fair in that situation.

He'd be flatfooted because he hasn't acted in initiative.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Just have the guard make an attack.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I have a player who's a 14th level bladebound magus. However, none of the magus abilities beyond that level appeal to her. She isn't a fan of any of the 6th level magus spells and none of the magus arcana appeal to her. She's not sure where to go from here.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1. Common house rule.

2. Don't like it. I'm more of a fan of increasing the death threshold and allowing characters to stay conscious but unable to take actions while dying if they succeed at a Fortitude save. It's more dramatic and allows characters to have "last words" before they die.

3. Don't like it. Slows down combat.

4. Don't like it. I prefer a flat bonus.

5. I agree the CMD calculation needs revisited. It's already heavily stacked against the players because of size bonuses.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

The problem with alternate drunk rules is that they're often so complicated that no one remembers them and no one will bother busting out the rule books to find out what they are. PF's rules are simple and easily remembered. You can handle a number of drinks equal 1 + your Con modifier. Afterward, you're sickened.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I'm never a fan of spell resistance. Especially when there's a host of mechanical problems with it. Heck, even some of the Pathfinder designers hate how it works.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

VikingIrishman wrote:
Cyrad wrote:
What else does he want besides healing? Hexcrafter can also get Slumber, Flight, and other stuff.
Sorry, I left out words. It's been a long day. I meant to ask what, aside from the mentioned hexes, does Hexcrafter grant in the arena of healing? The 1/day effect of the hexes are a bit off-putting for him.

Healing hex is pretty amazing because it's a cure for each member of the party. IF he wants more, you could let him do spell research or maybe swap the magus list for witch? Or maybe say everytime he takes the spell blending arcana, he chooses from witch instead of wizard spells?

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

What else does he want besides healing? Hexcrafter can also get Slumber, Flight, and other stuff.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I'm not crazy about all the abilities that give you tons of extra attacks (even the monk doesn't get that much!). Also, the Signature Equipment allows you to get a +6 weapon, which isn't possible unless mythic rules.

Other than that, it looks rather solid! Your hard work shows.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ethereal Gears wrote:
I think the more important question we need to ask ourselves is whether or not Strength, as an ability score, is in need of some kind of a boost to make it more relevant. In my home games I've never found that people playing STR-focused characters over DEX-focused ones feel like they're not getting their money's worth out of STR

This aligns with my observations. The most powerful PC in my 3-year campaign is a Dex-based magus and even she doesn't do anywhere as much damage as the Strength-based fighters in the group. Mathematically, as long as Dexterity-based fighters don't reap the same benefits as Strength-based fighters for two-handing weapons, Strength is still valuable.

Also keep in mind that if you lump Strength and Constitution together, this is also a huge buff to ranged fighters and Dexterity-based fighters because now they don't get to suffer the drawbacks of their builds.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

VikingIrishman wrote:
SyrioForel wrote:

First of all, you need to realize the burst potential that comes from this ability. Full round action to cast two touch spells and deliver them through your blade? At level 4? At the very least move this to 6 and I would recommend moving it to level 11. At that point you may as well just quicken stuff.

I recommend making the chain spell ability allow you to use the quicken metamagic feat for only like 3 levels more or like 1 level less per 2 points you spend from your arcane pool.

Oh yeah, I'm fully aware of the burst potential. The main problem with Quicken for Magus is that you'll only ever be able to Quicken 2nd level spells or lower. Sure, doubled Scorching Ray is decent, but I'd rather just cast Chain Lightning.

What if Chainspell treated the Magus as half of his caster level for the purposes of spell effects and what level of spell he can Chainspell? That limits the ability to 4th level spells as a 20th level Magus and treats you as a 10th level caster for each of those spells. The most damage you're getting out of that is a 20d8 doubled Detonate, which is still probably a worse option than Chain Lightning.

That still doesn't sound like a good idea. Damage is also not the main concern I have with doublecasting.

If chaining spells is so important, he can technically still do it at 1st level. He can cast a touch spell ahead of time, hold the charge until next turn, spell combat, discharge the spell, and then immediately cast another one.

Again, I'm not understanding what's vital for the "feel" of a Red Mage. There isn't much to the Red Mage in Final Fantasy -- it's just a mage that can fight and has a variety of spells. That's not novel in Pathfinder. The Red Mage typically uses rapiers, has light armor, and has a magic list consists of blasts, defense buffs, disables, and heal spells. If he plays a rapier-wielding Dex-based hexcrafter magus, that would cover all the bases. The magus spell list consists of blasts and defensive buff. The hexcrafter can get decent healing abilities and some of the best disables in the game.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ability scores are an integral part of the game. Changing them will have massive consequences.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

It's kind of broken. Being able to cast multiple spells in a round is incredibly powerful. It's one of the reasons Quicken Spell is a +4 metamagic feat and why it's one of the most powerful feats in the game. And this archetype allows you to do it at 4th level. Heck, even in Final Fantasy, Dual Casting is a high level ability

Because of Quicken Spell, you don't really need to make up a new doublecasting ability. There mechanically really isn't much to the Red Mage other than being a job that can fight, cast offensive spells, and cast support spells. The rest of it is style. Many classes in PF do that. An arcane duelist bard would work or a hexcrafter magus or a white mage arcanist eldritch knight.

What in particular is the player looking for?

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

A good step is find out what interests your group.

I honestly have too many world ideas..

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

I think undercasting fits what you're looking for. I heard of GMs who let players get Metamagic feats for free.

You don't really need to have spellcasters get the next spell in progression automatically. Prepared casters can learn an infinite amount of spells and spontaneous casters can retrain their spells known when they level up.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

In those situations, you're better off just using GM fiat to determine whether or not a particular class is considered a witch for these circumstances.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Goth Guru wrote:
Reverse order shapeshifter: Some Kitsune are born as a fox.

When you use Fridge Logic, that's actually kind of creepy and squicky.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

That sounds incredibly vague. Exactly what class features are we talking about here?

Do you really have traps in your campaign that target specific classes by name?

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

The concept sounds both too vague and too narrow to make into a single class. Have you looked at any of the psychic classes from Occult Adventures? There's several classes that can read and manipulate minds.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I always liked how Pharasma was retconned in Inner Sea Gods as having an unorthodox sect of worshippers that dress like clowns in order to explain the creative liberties Carolina Eade took when illustrating clergy of the gothic goddess of life and death.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Have minigames with prizes.

I once had a target shooting game where the gunslinger rolled a natural 20 on his attack roll. I then had him confirm it with a Perform check and he ended up drawing a massive crowd watching him.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

You could have just mentioned this thread in the thread that's actually alive...

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Master Codex wrote:
Cyrad wrote:
This isn't a video game where a warrior can run around using nothing but a sword and still expect to live.
Yes, but this is also a group game where if one player finds they are at a disadvantage, they should find a way to overcome with the group. The Barbarian wouldn't be able to do the things I want him to do if I build him to shoot just as far as our one archers range, so instead he would look for a way to cancel out the inane range of one of his foes.

If you design an encounter in an environment that gives a significant disadvantage to your monster's preferred fighting style, you can count on them being destroyed. Don't have the encounter take place somewhere open. Make it indoors or have lots of cover. If he's out in the field, give him mobility options like a mount.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Ethereal Gears wrote:
Sometimes I feel like, if fighters really are meant to be the "combat feat guys", they should gain combat feats in exactly the same manner as wizards gain spells, possibly even including the ability to buy "combat manuals" (akin to scrolls) from which to learn new ones, preparing different combat feats every day via drilling and training and gaining two free combat feats every level. Possibly tone the number of feats (in comparison to spells) down a little to account for the fact that feats don't come neatly packaged into "levels".

Aye, I made that suggestion ages ago from an observation by Sean K. Reynolds on the subjec. He remarked that a big disparity between the wizard and fighter stems from a wizard player being able to essentially rebuild his character on a daily basis whereas the fighter is shoehorned into a single build and is punished for vertasility. It led to SKR designing the brawler's martial flexibility and making feats work like spells in his Five Moons RPG.

I took the observation to heart and currently have a class baking in the oven that can create "combat styles" out of combat feats. For example, they can have a combat style with Power Attack+Cleave and a combat style with Point Blank Shot + Precise Aim.

A simple houserule could allow any class with bonus combat feats to retrain their last bonus feat X times per day, similar to how the Inquisitor can retrain his last teamwork bonus feat.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ethereal Gears wrote:
Yeah, sorry, I should've clarified, I meant all Fighters, not just Weapon Masters. There are way too many fun archetypes that trade out armor training, and I want those fighters to be able to get AWT at 5th level too, as it were.

ALL fighters can get Advanced Weapon Training at 5th level. Do you own the Weapon Master's Handbook?

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Blackwaltzomega wrote:
Vrog Skyreaver wrote:
It's very easy to fix the fighter problem. Have all the people who complain about them actually play one.
What about the people who did play fighter and are complaining because it's boring as crap compared to basically every class that does what it does?

See, that's what Skyreaver is talking about. Most suggestions on fixing the fighter focus on making him better at what he already does, not making him more fun to play.

It's one of the many reasons I consider nearly all discussions about fixing the fighter as incredibly unproductive.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ethereal Gears wrote:
I agree that cool things should turn on at 5th level. I don't consider weapon training, by itself, to be a "cool thing". I do however consider advanced weapon training to be cool, which is why I want it available starting at 5th level.

The fighter can get Advanced Training at 5th level...In fact, a weapon master can get it at 4th level and gain multiple advanced trainings at the cost of bonus feats.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

Ethereal Gears wrote:
I think my main line of thinking is that making weapon training start at 1st level is not something that should be done in order for the fighter to become a more attractive dip option. Rather, the main benefit would be that you would get an attack/damage boost at 1st level like every other martial, and that you could also start picking up advanced weapon training options at 5th level rather than 9th level (the latter seems way too late for me). With this in mind, fighters becoming more dippable is more like an acceptable by-product which I consider to be worth it to gain the two benefits stated above.

But the fighter can already gain a combat boost at 1st level with the combat feat they choose. And it makes sense the awesome options "turn on" at 5th level and higher because that's when the fighter starts to fall off.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

If you can make a sword out of $20 worth of steel, that doesn't mean your sword is worth $20.

I'm baffled why some people don't understand that.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Boomerang Nebula wrote:
Cyrad wrote:
Boomerang Nebula wrote:

What is wrong with the fighter being a good dip class?

One way to make a fighter more interesting is to give them an ability to get more utility out of magic items. Magic armour gives a bonus to saves as well as to AC for instance.

Many reasons. One of them being that the fighter is already a good dip class. If the fighter should receive buffs, then it should be buffs that make it more worthwhile for 20 levels, not making them an even better dip class.

As for your suggestion, there's already feats that do that.

I agree that the fighter should get more abilities (preferably non combat ones) as they level up to make them more interesting at every level. I don't agree that they can't be improved as a dip class as well. In my games the fighter is the most common type of hero, so there should be a strong incentive to want to play one or a fighter multiclass.

What is the name of the feat(s) you are referring to? I would be curious to see if they do what I have in mind.

It's usually unwise in game design to make something way better in something they're already really good at. There's already strong incentive to play a fighter as a dip class. It makes no sense to increase that incentive.

There's feats in Weapon Master's Handbook that you cast spells from magic items depending on its school of magic. For example, there's one feat that let's you dimension door if you have a magic item with the conjuration school. The prerequisites for these feats rely on your base Fortitude save and some modest amount of ranks in Use Magic Device. So pretty ideal for a fighter or other martial.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Eryx_UK wrote:
No Numeria in my games. That area is just a blasted wasteland where a meteor struck. But then I'm not a fan of sci-fi technology in my games.

I gotta be honest. I've been running my campaign for 3 years and I still haven't made a decision whether or not Numeria exists.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

2 people marked this as a favorite.

To me, explaining Aroden's death is like explaining the Lady of Pain. It's a mystery that's best left unexplained to leave players wondering and leave the GM to figure out themselves if they desire. And it's a mystery whose answer is largely inconsequential. It doesn't matter how Aroden died. What's important is the impact his death had on the world as a whole that makes the setting ripe for adventure.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Steve Geddes wrote:
Brother Fen wrote:
What happened to Aroden and why?

The leaving this unanswered is my one major gripe with Paizo's choices around Golarion. The "preservation of mystery" is a real negative for me.

Because I'll never know the true answer, Aroden's faith will never feature significantly in my campaigns - so I always feel like I'm missing out on a real, significant part of the world history.

I think it was a shrewd decision, leaving the GM to figure it out themselves. Though, the impact of Aroden's death is more important to adventures than Aroden himself.

I decided as a GM that the reason Aroden died is because the Starstone's effects are temporary. He lost his divinity and either died or got trapped somewhere without his divine powers to get him out. This explains why Pharasma won't say anything (would devastate multiple religions and societies) and why the Starstone Doctrine was wrong (the prophecy foretelling of Aroden's return as a mortal was misinterpreted as his return to the Material Plane). It also fills a plot hole as to why the Aboleth, a race of super intelligent creatures, would punish humanity by delivering a rock that turns people into gods.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.

After resurrecting a dead god of my creation that Razmir supposedly killed as one of his steps to divinity, the party believes that Razmir doesn't actually exist and that he is merely a false figurehead created by a party of high level adventurers that conquered the Arch-Duchy of Melcat 50 years ago. The party found a gem containing the soul of one of the adventurers' fallen comrades, who bares a striking resemblance to Razmir. Having been trapped in the gem for decades, the man is completely oblivious that an entire religion and nation was built using his image.

RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 16

The move action to study targets is a big deal. Every time you switch targets (or you kill one of them) you have to waste a move action.

1 to 50 of 3,150 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

©2002–2015 Paizo Inc.®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Inc., Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Inc., and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Inc. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Inc. under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.