Paizo Top Nav Branding
Welcome, guest! | Sign In | My Account | My Subscriptions | My Downloads | My Wishlists | Shopping Cart   Shopping Cart | Help/FAQ
About Paizo   Messageboards   News   Paizo Blog   Help/FAQ  
Search

Links
Shop
Recent Reviews

Cavalier Mounts (PFRPG)
****( ) by Eric Hinkle

Pathfinder Adventure Path #69: Maiden, Mother, Crone (Reign of Winter 3 of 6)
***( )( ) by Lord Snow

Pathfinder Society Scenario #53: Echoes of the Everwar—Part IV: The Faithless Dead (PFRPG) PDF
**( )( )( ) by KestlerGunner

Pathfinder Battles—Heroes & Monsters: Half-Orc Barbarian
***** by FabulousJeremy

Pathfinder Society Scenario #2-19: Shades of Ice—Part III: Keep of the Huscarl King (PFRPG) PDF
*( )( )( )( ) by FabulousJeremy

Paizo People
RSS RSS RSS RSS Facebook Twitter Email

Goblin

Comrade Anklebiter's page

3,935 posts. Alias of Doodlebug Anklebiter.

RSS

Search Posts
Search Comrade Anklebiter's posts:

1 to 50 of 3,935 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>

Alpha Ralpha Boulevard!

What do you guys like better as a pseudonym: James Tiptree, Jr., or f+@+in' Raccoona Sheldon?

Also, in an effort to be offensive, you are all stupid.


Not sure where this should go, but

Glenn Greenwald hands Bill Maher his ass


Like I said, Gobonics.


Preach on, Comrade Dwarf!


I was browsing through tv shows on youtube for another thread and came upon this possibly on-topic clip from All in the Family.

Many awesome highlights, but my faves is at 6:28.


Mark Sweetman wrote:
Using a similar but different rebuttal - in 1941 a movie called 'How Green was My Valley' won the Best Picture oscar... does that mean it's a better 'quality' movie than 'Citizen Kane'?

Comrades, we either strike or expatriate! To America, where we'll probably end up working for that plutocrat, Charles Foster Kane!

Strike! Strike! Strike!

(No, it's not a better film--imho--but it's pretty good and, unlike CK, it didn't go out of its way to piss off multiple plutocrats with connections to the entertainment industry. Hee hee, Orson, you're such a troll.)


meatrace wrote:

Where's stuffy grammarian when you need him. Or stuffy...punctuarian?

The line Bugleyman quoted only had a close quotes at the end, so I can understand why he thought that was you saying it, not JF.

I'm Stuffy Grammarian-proof. Whenever challenged on, say, incorrect spelling, or improper quotation mark usage (look, I figured I'd throw 'em around the cut-and-paste block under the link and it would be obvious, okay?), I can hide behind either a) inebriation; or, b) an unfamiliarity with English punctuation rules. We don't use 'em in Gobonics.


I already said it was dreamy! That's as far as I go!


bugleyman wrote:
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
The folks on Obama’s enemies list are not saying that, in fact they are not saying anything because most of them are dead.

Are you suggesting that Obama has been executing his political rivals?

No, that would be Jonathan Franklin. In case you didn't know, quotation marks (" ") indicate that somebody other than the writer is speaking.


Yeah, but with more orgies.


I, alas, can't favorite that, TOZ, because it does not call for international proletarian socialist revolution, but it does sound dreamy.


Benghazi, Petraeus, and the CIA

I like the end:

"In my book, Global NATO and the Catastrophic Failure in Libya, I have challenged this verdict that the intervention did more good than harm. Some other supporters of the Libya intervention are now calculating the costs as embassies rush to leave the people to the mercy of the militias. According to the British newspaper the Guardian, “the fear of further violence has led to the British and US embassies withdrawing some staff, the European Union closing its mission in Tripoli and BP announcing it was pulling out non-essential staff.” France had already scaled back its operations after a military attack on its mission in Tripoli. What Daryl Issa and the forces calling the issues of Benghazi a cover-up are refusing to deal with is the deceptions and lies that led to the catastrophic situation in Libya and North Africa today."

In your face, supporters of humanitarian interventionism.


Is Obama the New Nixon?

"Whose enemies list would you rather be on Nixon or Obama? Nixon’s political enemies list which began at a list of a modest 20 people expanded to nearly 600 and was designed to be used in conjunction with IRS Audits of politically unacceptable thinking (sound familiar??) but in reality the IRS hammer was rarely if ever implemented. The Nixon crew was unable to organize reprisals against the vast majority of people on the list, leading those on the list to rank it not as punishment but as a cool social status. Gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson was indignant that he was not on the list, “I would almost have preferred a vindictive tax audit to that kind of crippling exclusion.”

The folks on Obama’s enemies list are not saying that, in fact they are not saying anything because most of them are dead."


1 person marked this as a favorite.

You guys are talking about the black population, the n-word and Harlan Ellison?

Pfft.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Scott Betts wrote:
These aren't scandals because they're actually scandalous. These are scandals because they are opportunities.

Oh, I know. Still, there's probably a lot of scandal in Benghazi, just not where the Repubs are looking.


"Unable to strangle the revolution, the United States set out to isolate Cuba in order to make short shrift of it later."

--Che Guevara Speaks, "Cuba and the Kennedy Plan"

"The next morning, the last thing Katniss sees before entering the games is

Spoiler:
Cinna
being beaten by
Spoiler:
Peacekeepers.
."

--Sheila Llanas, How to Analyze the Works of Suzanne Collins which is for, like, 8th-graders and contains more insights into The Hunger Games than Anita Sarkeesian.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

It's kind of sad that of all the scandals "rocking" the Obama administration, one of them isn't the 100-f#*$ing-day hunger strike by a bunch of dudes who appear to have been, in my humble opinion, locked away for 11 years for no apparent reason


Benghazi? [Yawn]

What about Majer?


And, just for fun, Guardian article where Cornel West calls Obama a war criminal.

Vive le Galt!


meatrace wrote:

Basically title.

Benghazi isn't what the Republicans need it to be.

The IRS "scandal" isn't a big deal either; the IRS audited hundreds of groups with obvious political agendas, on both ends of the political spectrum. What's scandalous to me is that all the tea party groups investigated were cleared and given their c4 status.

If the Republicans really want to make a meaningful stand, and regain some (any) respect from the American people, they should be on this DOJ AP story.

I was kind of feeling blase about that. I mean, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Anwar al-Awlaki, his son, warrantless wiretapping, FISA, etc., etc., ad nauseam, I just couldn't work up the outrage.

Fortunately, there's always Chris Hedges to get appropriately apocalyptic about the AP story.

"And so, yeah, I think we’re in a very, very frightening moment."



meatrace wrote:
Instead we have a page of conservatives screaming about the singular non-scandal of Obama's presidency: Benghazi, and defending the clearly partisan witch-hunt surrounding it.

That's hardly screaming.


Kahn Zordlon wrote:
Morality and Economic Law: Toward a Reconciliation by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

Peter G. Peterson Institure for International Economics report: Can Labor Standards Improve Under Globalization? Chapter 6: Globalization and Labor Standards seems to address the Bangladeshi child prostitute issue. (Scroll to the top)


More reproachful union douchebags

The Central Ohio Association of Catholic Educators better not be in the ALF-CIO!!


Inspired by Comrade Samnell, I picked up Che Guevara Speaks after I finished Mockingjay.

Re: the latter: [sobs]

This, comrades, is why we don't ally ourselves with various and sundry bourgeois causes, and why the working class must only rely upon its own power in order to achieve its goals.

[Sobs some more]

Vive le Galt! (half-heartedly)


Kahn Zordlon wrote:
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
More importantly, assuming Citizen Zordlon told the anecdote correctly, it doesn't mean anything. Citizen Bourdain is elected steward and management sends a thug around? How exactly is this an anti-union story?
I take affront that you would take me for telling anything other than the truth.

I wasn't accusing you of dishonesty, I was allowing for possible garblage on your part. 'Cuz otherwise, your anecdote doesn't say much:

Unions try to keep around older guys based on seniority that don't meet Bourdain's exacting culinary standards.
(Speaking of which...) Bourdain and his fellow workers dislike their representation and hold steward elections; oust Luis. Management comes by and and biznitches.

All things considered, it's not exactly On the Waterfront.


TriOmegaZero wrote:

I think the point was that Luis was in managements pocket, earning job security for himself and other senior employees by not utilizing union negotiating power.

Which only says that corrupt leadership is bad on both sides, not that unions are bad.

Well, setting aside possible Anklebiter reading comprehesion problems, then we're left with a story about a bought-off shop steward being replaced in democratic elections by the future Food Network star who then gets harrassed by management.

As far as anti-union stories go, it's a little meh.


Meanwhile, to continue a leitmotif from above, the workers representatives are far from without reproach:

The Reprehensible Meddling of the AFL-CIO’s Solidarity Center: Big Labor’s Tool of Empire


Irontruth wrote:
Kahn Zordlon wrote:

It is difficult to go against the tide, when believe it or not, I have your best interests at heart. I was reading through a early 20th century essay on unions, but it made me remember something much more interesting and entertaining that I came across.

From Anthony Bourdain's Kitchen Confidential:
he's talking about his job at the Rainbow Room in NYC atop Rockafeller Center
Quote:
They were mostly older guys who'd worked in the hangar-sized kitchen forever, their jobs secured by a union who's only discernible benefits were guaranteed job security and an assured mediocrity of cuisine

Eventually he works his way through the ranks and is granted shop steward. This is sort of head negotiator and deals with union president. He won by election.

Quote:
The next day, someone from management came by and made an unusually frank suggestion: if I wanted a long, successful and, most important, healthy career in the restaurant business, perhaps I should step down and let that nice Luis continue his good works as shop steward.

I like how you think this anecdote is more important that the fact that union workers average $10,000 more per year than their non-union counterparts.

Convince me why it's in my best interest to give up $10,000/year, and give up my medical and retirement benefits. You said you have my best interests at heart, but that doesn't sound very convincing.

More importantly, assuming Citizen Zordlon told the anecdote correctly, it doesn't mean anything. Citizen Bourdain is elected steward and management sends a thug around? How exactly is this an anti-union story?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
pres man wrote:
AP Exclusive: IRS knew tea party targeted in 2011

Homeland Security Tracked Occupy Wall Street 'Peaceful Activist Demonstrations'

Now, finally, Occupy and the Tea Party have something in common!


Third attempt to post this:

Not much politrolling going on today-- :(-- so, uh, I watched The U.S. Vs. John Lennon again last week. Pretty good flick.

Power to the People

Gimme Some Truth

and

Instant Karma

which isn't very politrollish, but is awesome nonetheless.


Kajehase wrote:

Curse you Anklebiter!

Y en Español

[Raises fist]

Spoiler:
Can you hear the drums fernando?
I remember long ago another starry night like this
In the firelight fernando
You were humming to yourself and softly strumming your guitar
I could hear the distant drums
And sounds of bugle calls were coming from afar

They were closer now fernando
Every hour every minute seemed to last eternity
I was so afraid fernando
We were young and full of life and none of us prepared to die
And I'm not ashamed to say
The roar of guns and cannons almost made me cry

There was something in the air that night
The stars were bright, fernando
They were shining there for you and me
For liberty, fernando

Though I never thought that we could lose
There's no regret
If I had to do the same again
I would, my friend, fernando

Now we're old and grey fernando
And since many years I haven't seen a rifle in your hand
Can you hear the drums fernando?
Do you still recall the frightful night we crossed the rio grande?
I can see it in your eyes
How proud you were to fight for freedom in this land

There was something in the air that night
The stars were bright, fernando
They were shining there for you and me
For liberty, fernando

Though I never thought that we could lose
There's no regret
If I had to do the same again
I would, my friend, fernando

There was something in the air that night
The stars were bright, fernando
They were shining there for you and me
For liberty, fernando

Though I never thought that we could lose
There's no regret
If I had to do the same again
I would, my friend, fernando

Yes, if I had to do the same again
I would, my friend, fernando...

La lucha continua!

Vive le Galt!


Finished Class Struggles yesterday, and although I feel like I could probably spend the next year reading about the French revolution of 1848, it's probably time to get back to the Priscilla Robertson book and do the rest of the continent.

That is, after I finish Mockingjay. Only one third left to go. Not turning out to be as much of a workers revolution as I'd prefer, but, whatevs, I'll take it. Also, when I'm done, I'm going back to trolling the Anita Sarkeesian thread. Who talked shiznit about Catching Fire and Mockingjay because her feminism is hollow and stupid.

Vive le Katniss and her love triangle!


You might want to check with your local International Brotherhood of Teamsters local.


Yeah, weapons of mass destruction = a plastic gun that can fire six shots.

Then again, Julius Rosenberg is one of my personal heroes, so maybe I'm not the right person to ask...


You're on a roll, today, Comrade Jeff.


Citizen Zordlon, if you have time in your busy one-man-against-the-thread routine (and, btw, you can have the thread for now, but I'm gonna be wanting it back later):

Kahn Zordlon wrote:
thejeff wrote:
And that doesn't count the conditions offshore where most of the cool gadgets are actually made. Or where the rare mineral are mined.
I think that a large deposit of lithium was found in one of the middle eastern contries (forget which). The country is poor and mining there will help the country. The offshore conditions are probably similar to the industrial revolution the US went through, and is a necessary evolutionary stage of the economy.

Why? I don't pretend to have read Friedman, and I've never taken an economics course, but I've never understood this part of the debate.

I mean, I don't know which Middle Eastern country you are referring to, but lots of them have modern militaries, why is it necessary for them to have terrible First World-a-century-ago working conditions?

(Although, when you look closely at America's First World working conditions--West Fertilizer, British Petroleum, Massey Energy--they start looking not so hot.)


Anyway, to wrap up this whole non-violent resistance derail...

DarkLightHitomi wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
DarkLightHitomi wrote:
Someone back there mentioned people who fear the world. I don't fear the world but I am aware of possible dangers, including the fact that if only police and military have guns, then they decide to turn the us into a dictatorship, what can the people do?
Nonviolently resist until the police and military join them.
You think that'll actually work?

I guess, DLH, that if, heaven forbid, Americans ever needed to resist tyranny, the best thing to do would be engage in civil disobedience and hope that twenty years later the Australians will rescue us.


thejeff wrote:
They stayed rich. It was a little harder to get good servants, but they got all sorts of technological gadgets to make up for it.

I'm afraid I can't favorite the whole post due to ultraleft sectarianism, but this part made me giggle.

Hee hee!


Shifty wrote:
Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
We'll have to wait and see whether Anglo-Australian concern over West Papau trumps the "close relations and expanding security relationship" between Washington and Jakarta.

They certainly got involved in the East Timor situation be providing strategic support to the Australian intervention. Jakarta certainly wasn't happy about having a pile of Aussies turning up one fine morning and the TNI forces (and TNI equipped milita gangs) were a bit butthurt about it. Having the US sitting about chillaxing on the waves nearby kept Jakarta pretty quiet, and that allowed our soldiers to restore order and help bring about an electoral process.

Can't say the Timorese have been very forthcoming with thanks afterwards though.

So, by "thanks," do you mean oil and natural gas profits?

Anyway, the more I read about East Timorese independence (UN troops, American ships chillaxing on the waves), the less inclined I am to chalk it up to non-violent resistance.



Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
DarkLightHitomi wrote:

Egypt

India

Not East Timor, but West Papau

Vs countless violent resistances and overthrowings.

I did address it as a possibility, i just think it highly unlikely, particularly if we have very many people who fit the redneck stereotype.

I'm not certain if you're talking to me or not, DLH, but on the off-chance that you are:

Spoiler:
I'm pretty much agreeing with you. Two years after the Tahrir Square occupation and it really isn't clear to me that life in Egypt has gotten any better for your average dude on the street. From what I hear, it's gotten demonstrably worse for the average dudette.

Gandhi always puzzles me. I don't know a hell of a lot about the struggle for Indian independence, but I do know that the British were able to carve out half of their former colony as an independent puppet state (Pakistan) and along with that went the largest ethnic cleansing operation in recorded human history (I think--it's hard to keep track, the 20th century being as horrific as it was). Not that I think Gandhi should bear the blame for it, but it's hard to see how that registers as a great success for non-violent resistance.

East Timor I will give the nvr crowd, although I suspect it had less to do with the East Timorese's adoption of non-violence as much as it had to do with the Clinton administration being less committed to a mass-murdering, gang-raping, genocidal Indonesia than three decades of previous American administrations.

We'll have to wait and see whether Anglo-Australian concern over West Papau trumps the "close relations and expanding security relationship" between Washington and Jakarta.

I doubt anyone will be surprised that I doubt it.


Kahn Zordlon wrote:
If we enacted child labor, or osha-type regulations on a 3rd world country, or on the people living in a materially poor era like GOT, there would be mass starvation and unrest.

You mean, as opposed to the unrest coming from factory fires that kill 750+?


Two things I found while looking up what that was:

Particularly enjoyed The Lady Eve vid

Viva Vivienne! Free Bradley Manning!


TriOmegaZero wrote:
DarkLightHitomi wrote:
You think that'll actually work?
Seems to have worked in Egypt and other places. Ghandi might have a good view of it if he were still alive.

Egypt

India

Not East Timor, but West Papau



Scott Betts wrote:
TOZ wrote:
If you don't allow me to print my guns you're effectively banning those guns from me and violating my 2nd Amendment rights.

Creation and ownership are not and have never been legally equivalent.

For instance, it is legal to own $100 bills.

It is not legal for you to print new $100 bills.

The Constitution (arguably) guarantees the right to "keep and bear" firearms. No mention is made of their creation, and to my knowledge not court decision has held that the 2nd amendment implies the right to create firearms. Creating firearms for personal use is legal, but that is a function of federal law, not the Constitution, and modifying that law to address 3D printing would be much, much easier than amending the Constitution or rolling the dice with a Supreme Court decision.

It's okay, TOZ--I thought it was funny.


ciretose wrote:
Which is the core of the debate. If you want a gun because you are afraid of the world, I don't have an issue with you getting a gun. It is irrational, since every study says you are in more danger because you are a gun owner, but whatever.

I've never owned a gun, nor have I ever wanted to own a gun, but, indeed, whatever.


On the other hand, I didn't have a gun, they did have a knife and a baseball bat, and I still got hit in the head.


"Meanwhile, a plethora of organizations sprang up--Viktor Anpilov's RKRP, Alexei Prigarin's Soyuz Kommunistov, Anatoly Kryuchkov's RPK, Nina Andreyeva's VKPB, Roy Medvedev and A. Denisov's [Wesley from Angel?!?] SPT and numerous others--all claiming the threadbare mantle or, more to the point, the vast properties of the CPSU."

--Stalinism--Gravedigger of the Revolution: How the Soviet Workers State Was Strangled: For Socialist Revolution to Sweey Away Yeltsin Counterrevolution!

"It at once excluded the representatives of the proletariat, Louis Blanc and Albert, from the Executive Commission appointed by it; it threw out the proposal of a special Labor Ministry, and received with stormy applause the statement of the Minister Trelat: 'The question is merely one of bringing labor back to its old conditions.'"

--Karl Marx, Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850

"She likes District 13 well enough, even though she thinks the cooks are somewhat lacking in imagination."

--Suzanne Collins, Mockingjay

Vive le Katniss!

1 to 50 of 3,935 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>



©2002–2013 Paizo Publishing, LLC®. Need help? Email customer.service@paizo.com or call 425-250-0800 during our business hours: Monday–Friday, 10 AM–5 PM Pacific Time. View our privacy policy. Paizo Publishing, LLC, Paizo, the Paizo golem logo, Pathfinder, the Pathfinder logo, Pathfinder Society, GameMastery, and Planet Stories are registered trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC, and Pathfinder Roleplaying Game, Pathfinder Campaign Setting, Pathfinder Adventure Path, Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, Pathfinder Player Companion, Pathfinder Modules, Pathfinder Tales, Pathfinder Battles, Pathfinder Online, PaizoCon, RPG Superstar, The Golem's Got It, Titanic Games, the Titanic logo, and the Planet Stories planet logo are trademarks of Paizo Publishing, LLC. Dungeons & Dragons, Dragon, Dungeon, and Polyhedron are registered trademarks of Wizards of the Coast, Inc., a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc., and have been used by Paizo Publishing under license. Most product names are trademarks owned or used under license by the companies that publish those products; use of such names without mention of trademark status should not be construed as a challenge to such status.