| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Did you give the PCs knowledge checks to identify the Tieflings? That may color their responses later if they know more clearly that they're not "half-demons".
The Necromancer is not going to be happy letting them go if they know there's necromancy going on there. He would want the PC intruders silenced.
Threatening to go to Hemlock or Deverin about the intruders is something of a Bluff attempt (because the caster and Habe do not want Hemlock or Deverin to know about the caster), and the PCs get Sense Motive checks to oppose the Bluff.
It is not clear how the situation unfolded (if the PCs are in the middle of interrogating someone, why is the barbarian in a different place {if that's the case} and not with them)?
Do the players NOT want to go back for some reason? That's not clear. You said they want to, so are you looking for suggestions to justify their return (like the written orders from Hemlock)?
It is not necessary that they go back.. they don't have to complete every area to succeed. So they are certainly within their rights to call this one "done" (although Habe and his backer may have other ideas; as I said, they don't want news getting around, especially to authorities).
Your job as GM isn't to force them to do things. Your job as GM is to apply the effects of their decisions... good or bad... and let them react to the new situation.
If some of the party want to go back, and some don't, then they need to come to a consensus on that before you worry too much about giving them an excuse/reason.
If they want to sneak back in, for example, you have nothing to worry about.
If some refuse to go back without an order, that may be good role-playing.
But the main thing is, they get to decide. If they can't decide, you don't need to force their hand. They may miss out on a clue or two, and some XP, but there is no need to make them go back. In one game I ran, my players entirely skipped going to Habe's at all and moved straight on to other clues (though I suspect there was more than a bit of meta-gaming involved).
Regarding the Tieflings, the Paladin may harbor some in-character bigotry about them, but Tieflings are no more inherently Evil than Elves, Dwarves, Humans, Halflings, etc. are... or than Aasimars are automatically Good. Suspecting them may be a minor character flaw that can become a theme for the Paladin's growth in role-play. Asking them why they're there can give a response like "We're here because it's an out-of-the-way place where we don't have to deal every day with people assuming we're up to no good because of our heritage."
I don't think there's anything yet that you need to beat yourself up over. If anything, you need to watch out not to force the PCs into the choices you want them to make. It doesn't seem like you've done that yet, but your post makes it sound like you're ready to.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
If they're coming up short on XP or loot, random encounters can fill those gaps.
Although I cautioned against forcing them to go where you expect/want, there's nothing wrong with dropping a hint if they're undecided.
As long as you're all having fun, though, there isn't much need to worry about meeting every possible encounter.
Regarding the Tieflings, the Paladin may harbor some in-character bigotry about them, but Tieflings are no more inherently Evil than Elves, Dwarves, Humans, Halflings, etc. are... or than Aasimars are automatically Good.
In fact, if the PCs are stuck on the idea that being a Tiefling automatically makes one Evil, and that being an Aasimar automatically makes one good, they're going to be in for some rude surprises very soon.