
DungeonmasterCal |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

I've never dropped salted peanuts in a bottle/can of cola, but they are mighty tasty when munched while drinking a sweet cola. For peanut eating purposes, I always preferred RC Cola over Coke or Pepsi, but RC isn't likely as easily available.
RC really is optimum for this if you can find it.

Orthos |
10 people marked this as a favorite. |

I find white chocolate annoying, but I don't spend much time thinking about it...
Far, far more annoying though are the white chocolate evangelists who cannot fathom my dislike for the substance, and will unusually pester me repeatedly to "just try this" kind they are offering. No. No, freaking no.
I've never understood the people who are so gung-ho to get other people to like the stuff they like when it comes to food. It makes sense for other things, like "you should enjoy this hobby I like (so we can participate in them together)" or "you should read this author I enjoy (so we can talk about the stories together)" or so on and so forth. But not for food.
A better response IMO is "oh well more for me!" Which is exactly my response in this situation. Gimme all your white chocolate, Amby. Nom nom nom nom nom.

quibblemuch |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |

Explaining an assignment...only to have to re-explain it twelve times because "I wasn't listening, what did you say?"
I've actually said "Well then consider this a learning opportunity" and refused to repeat myself. Of course, I don't teach any more, and maybe that attitude has something to do with why...

Scintillae |
5 people marked this as a favorite. |

I find white chocolate annoying, but I don't spend much time thinking about it...
Far, far more annoying though are the white chocolate evangelists who cannot fathom my dislike for the substance, and will unusually pester me repeatedly to "just try this" kind they are offering. No. No, freaking no.
This is me with mint. I don't know why, but I cannot stand the taste of mint. Toothpaste is my limit. But every year...
"You should get thin mints. Thin mints are the best."
"No, I really don't-"
"HERESY. YOU MUST HAVE THIN MINTS. ESPECIALLY FROZEN THIN MINTS."
I hate thin mints. I love dark chocolate, but hiding that treacherous layer of mint within?
I don't want your danged hockey pucks of betrayal.

Scintillae |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |

captain yesterday wrote:I suppose once you hear the terrible shrieks of the Mint Gnomes being crushed in the Thinning Press, you can’t unhear it...I was in charge of the thin mint supply when I was a banquet liason at the hotel I worked at.
I can never eat them again.
It was mint to be.

quibblemuch |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |

quibblemuch wrote:It was mint to be.captain yesterday wrote:I suppose once you hear the terrible shrieks of the Mint Gnomes being crushed in the Thinning Press, you can’t unhear it...I was in charge of the thin mint supply when I was a banquet liason at the hotel I worked at.
I can never eat them again.
DAMMIT! That's two beverages in two hours. I've got to stop drinking things while reading the forums.

Fumarole |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |

People that type would of or could of instead of would've or could've. I get that it sounds about right, but damn people, do you even read what you type?
While we're on the subject of contractions, putting apostrophes in the wrong place is also on my list, doubly so when they're not needed at all. Typing 80's instead of '80s (this is a contraction, the apostrophe replaces 19) or CD's instead of CDs (no apostrophe is needed when pluralizing acronyms like this) gets me every time. I swear I get Forest Whitaker eye when I see these common mistakes.

DungeonmasterCal |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

DungeonmasterCal wrote:Java Man wrote:Describing a character (MMO or tabletop) as a "DPS" or a "DPR." Both of those are measurements of a rate, does anyone call a race car a "MPH"?Yeah. Me, too. And what even is a "DPS"?It is less "a" DPS and more just, "DPS."
Damage
Per
Second
"Damage per second"? Why on Earth would you need to calculate that?

Asmodeus' Advocate |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Tacticslion wrote:"Damage per second"? Why on Earth would you need to calculate that?DungeonmasterCal wrote:Java Man wrote:Describing a character (MMO or tabletop) as a "DPS" or a "DPR." Both of those are measurements of a rate, does anyone call a race car a "MPH"?Yeah. Me, too. And what even is a "DPS"?It is less "a" DPS and more just, "DPS."
Damage
Per
Second
So’s you can compare the DPS of your DPS to the DPS of their DPS, and thusly learn which DPS beats which DPS in a DPS contest.

Lady Ladile |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

^To follow up on the above, for MMOs it actually does kinda matter for doing raids and taking down big bosses. In WoW, for example, you've only got so long to kill a boss before they hit their enrage timer (they basically Hulk out and kill everyone) and so if your damage-dealers (DPS) aren't putting out enough damage over a certain amount of time then the raid will fail.
But I do agree that using that term outside of that context, such as to describe a Pathfinder character or something, has always seemed really silly to me.

Tacticslion |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

DungeonmasterCal wrote:So’s you can compare the DPS of your DPS to the DPS of their DPS, and thusly learn which DPS beats which DPS in a DPS contest.Tacticslion wrote:"Damage per second"? Why on Earth would you need to calculate that?DungeonmasterCal wrote:Java Man wrote:Describing a character (MMO or tabletop) as a "DPS" or a "DPR." Both of those are measurements of a rate, does anyone call a race car a "MPH"?Yeah. Me, too. And what even is a "DPS"?It is less "a" DPS and more just, "DPS."
Damage
Per
Second
This is... not that far from the truth.
But also, because when you're looking at winning at MMO powerful bosses in dungeons, you need to have relatively high "DPS" in order to overcome their regeneration, or to destroy them quickly enough before they destroy your team. It's part of a much larger set of meta-strategies that people are half-required to develop in order to actually win against some of the bigger boss monsters.
You compare DPS, healing, and so on to see what, exactly, you and your group can survive and how fast you can take down a given boss or set of bosses, and how long you can survive the same. Hit a golden ratio and you can probably win.

Tacticslion |

^To follow up on the above, for MMOs it actually does kinda matter for doing raids and taking down big bosses. In WoW, for example, you've only got so long to kill a boss before they hit their enrage timer (they basically Hulk out and kill everyone) and so if your damage-dealers (DPS) aren't putting out enough damage over a certain amount of time then the raid will fail.
But I do agree that using that term outside of that context, such as to describe a Pathfinder character or something, has always seemed really silly to me.
Ack! I was ninja'd! Rogue'd! Backstabbed!
Solid explanation.

The Vagrant Erudite |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Ok, I'm not going to call out any specific posts but they're very common. They're all variants of questions where someone asks if it's ok to do X or Y in their campaigns. I want to grab them by the nape of the neck and shout, "It's your game! Of course, you can do it!"
Yeah, ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.

Asmodeus' Advocate |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Coughing myself awake after being driven to be by feeling sick. DANG it, me, make up your daggum kind!
:(
*thinks about offering an internet hug but would rather not catch whatever it is you’ve got and besides I’m not really a hugging kind of person so offers internet pat on the back instead*