
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

This was a two-session game for us. The first week we had 5 players, second week we had 6 players, with 8 players total; 4 players receiving full credit, 4 receiving partial credit (2 XP, 4 Fame). It appears that I can report for 8 players so this should be fine.
However, as reported previously (eg http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2ursn?GM-Reporting-Reputation-bug#1 ), the "Reputation" column is still capped to 4.
It would seem a fairly simple matter to increase a limit by changing "4" to "5" in the code, but as this is still outstanding how should I report this? Or should we just avoid reporting this at all until the webapp is updated?

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I'm afraid the usefulness of tracking fame at all is lost given how few GMs will go back and correct reported scenarios if and when this is eventually fixed.
There's also replayable scenarios reporting no fame because the player replayed it with a different character, reporting no fame because a -70x Starfinder character is "incorrect type" for playing a Starfinder scenario, and other assorted madness.
I can imagine this being somewhat useful for statistics gathering, but then why not request whether tagged faction reputation was awarded too?
Maybe it'd be better to simply remove Fame reporting entirely and leave it to chronicle sheets to track it.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

There's also replayable scenarios reporting no fame because the player replayed it with a different character, reporting no fame because a -70x Starfinder character is "incorrect type" for playing a Starfinder scenario...
That one, as I understand it, is GM error you have (had?) to change the reporting type to STAR to get it to take at least toward the beginning.