GM 1990 |
3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Looking to start a series of threads on GM advice to tackle some common or not so common issues. Some of the topics exist in mixed various threads, but with game advances, new forum members etc a good topic never hurts being revisited with new thoughts. Good ideas for new GMs and new food for thought for experienced ones. So here goes the first shot.
TPK.
Depending on the type of game and the table's social contract maybe they're common, or maybe its never happened at your table. How have you handled it in your games? Would you have done it different if the same situation happened with another campaign you've run (or for a game shop group vs a family game?)
As a player how did you take it? Would you rather have the GM fudge rolls to prevent a TPK or prefer the danger of it?
Any advice on how the group can roll with? If you've had it happen and the GM ret-con'd it....how did the group feel about it over time?
Jack of Dust |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
We've gotten to the point where it was about to happen. The entire group decided it was better to just turn back the clock.
Here's a quick summary leaving a lot of details out: We were playing an undead campaign and our group had gotten captured by your standard ultra powerful level 20 Vampire villain of the overarching plot. The villain wanted to use us as undead weapons of mass destruction which involved a long process of going through surgery where we would become all sorts of different unique undead creatures (my character for example would become a kind of unliving spellscroll). He basically gave us an ultimatum; we could go along with his plan willingly or be put through the process by force and lose all memories we've had in our lives up to this point. When we got to the point where we were about to undergo the first of many surgeries, the party attempted to escape. Unfortunately this wasn't the point where the GM was expecting us to attempt to escape and had to improvise. The party was split up due to being led to different operating rooms and while myself and another caster were able to make short work of our own immediate guards, the others weren't as quick and lagged behind a bit. Me and my caster buddy hurried to a portal we knew was in the fortress due to the BBEG not locking us up for agreeing to the plan and some investigation but came upon the boss encounter the GM intended for the whole party to face without anywhere near as much resistance (he expected us to attempt to sneak out at an opportune moment) as we had drawn on ourselves. We ended the session knowing that next session it would just be the two Sorcerers attempting to fight and subdue an old enemy Graveknight blocking the narrow doorway quick enough before the other guards caught up with us.
We were only level 7 and had no way to bypass the Graveknight so the GM asked us if we would rather turn the clock back and inserting it as a sort of fever dream we had while undergoing the first part of the surgeries. The group agreed and we happily played on as normal. Plenty of mistakes were made on both sides of the screen but it was our first campaign playing Pathfinder.
Gilarius |
TPKs...
1) 1st edition, Against the Giants, part 3 (Fire Giants). Party fighter was wearing a Necklace of Fireballs, failed his save against a fireball. Boom. Only survivor of the party was the fighter/thief scouting ahead, fortunately with a ring of invisibility. He went back and scavenged the party's loot and bodies into his portable hole. Went off and got them ressurrected.
2) Also 1st ed, I was a player in Tomb of Horrors. TPK for walking along a corridor. No-one happy about that one, immediately retconned into allowing the thief to roll to spot the trap before we all died.
3) Party stops immediately outside the BBEG's final room. Party argues at length about exactly what tactics they were going to follow, loudly, and despite at least 3 warnings that their characters could sense that they were being scryed upon. BBEG and minions had the perfect counters to what they tried. This would have been a TPK, but I had them knocked out instead of killed and then Geased to serve the BBEG. Eventually, they broke free and returned to kill the BBEG.
When I am GMing, I tend to pull a punch or two if I think they are getting overwhelmed. If I miscalculate and the fight looks too easy, I add something, some of the time. The times to be careful are when an enemy has a special ability that can put multiple PCs out of action simultaneously. Eg Yeth Hounds baying; Umber Hulks with confusion every round. Poor dice rolls from everyone can turn an easy fight into a TPK.
Hugo Rune |
I've had a couple of TPKs whilst GMing. The TPKs are invariably a result of poor decision making and a lack of planning by the players (i.e. no reconnaissance, just blunder in and assume they will win). I allow the party 'a moment of insight' and rewind to the last point before the decision that leads to the TPK. The party incurs an XP debt equivalent to the encounter they failed and gains no XP when they do win that encounter.
The players tend to take it as a learning experience and are more careful in the future.
skizzerz |
If the TPK is a result of me being bad/wrong as GM (read a statblock wrong, designed an encounter that was far too challenging without offering a means of escape, etc.), I rewind and do it over. If the TPK is a result of the entire party being idiots despite nudges towards the right direction, I let them wipe. The latter has happened once in my entire career of GMming (in a 3.5 campaign), and just had them all roll up a new party and I rebooted the campaign in a different part of the world (still tackling the same major plot overall since the party was barely into it at that point, but I shifted locations and specifics to keep things fresh -- they wouldn't have known the old plot was tied to the original until far later on).
Ian Bell |
I always have a recovery scenario for a TPK in the back of my head when I'm running a game, which typically changes depending where they are in the plot (or if there's an overarching plot rather than episodic thing, etc.)
Sometimes that scenario involves making new characters with a particular hook to follow up on the dead characters, sometimes it involves a scenario where the dead characters come back, etc. Really depends on the circumstances but I make sure I plan ahead for that sort of possibility so I'm never caught without a plan.
As such I usually won't pull too many punches to stop a TPK in progress.
Anguish |
The best TPKs are the ones the DM doesn't see coming.
Two weeks ago, the Mummy's Mask campaign I'm playing in had one. 2nd-level, just as our roleplays were starting to gel, we encountered something bad.
It's not unreasonable to throw around save-or-suck effects. It is unreasonable to expect the entire party to roll 3s and 4s for their saves. Poof, 1st round of combat the entire party was incapacitated.
Surprise!
The DM just looked shocked.
In that case, he basically had us taken prisoners, waking to make our escape. A good call so we didn't lose our developing characters so... abruptly.
GM 1990 |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm running a game with my wife, kids, 12, 10, 8, and cameos by the 6 and 4 from time to time rolling for the bad-guys - all their first RPing experience. Knowing any PC death can be rough I actually inserted a deliberate dream sequence TPK near the culmination of the initial plot arc (about 8 sessions of gaming). there were several indications during the scenario that could have key'd them in that it "might" be a dream. Essentially it was a sum of all fears type session using several of their stated assumptions about the main antagonist plus a couple of their suspicions about other side-plot issues. things they "thought" were coming up, but all mixed together and then taken up to 10 scale. I didn't hold them in suspense, in fact it kicked off the session and the dreamer woke up when he was the last to fall, so we were able to quickly after everyone mentally recovered continue the session. The really fun part for me was, then starting the day exactly the same way as the dream started and watching them all cringing wondering how much of it was going to be repeated. It worked out nicely to have our first "TPK" as a group, and not have to ret-con it since it was a dream from the outset.
Overall it was a good chance for me to see how new players (and children in particular) were going to react to their first PC death). My daughter (10) took it pretty tough as it was playing out, my wife was giving me the "you're going to be sleeping on the couch" bit. It was tough for me to keep a straight face and tell them to focus on using group tactics (knowing it was like an APL +6...I was going to ensure it was a TPK for the effect) Afterwards we had a long talk about how RPG are so much fun because you do invest personally in the PC, and without risk there isn't as much fun. Nobody cares if the lost Risk playing red...but you care a whole lot when your PC dies. At the same time, PCs are going to die, ideally as a good part of the story, or at least as part of an epic show-down. The same way its sad in a book when a character dies, its that finality to their piece of the story.
I guess my last thought on it for now is after a long campaign, whether by TPK or just retiring its hard for it to be over. You invest as a GM and as a group in the story, and it kind of sucks when you know that story is over for those personalities. There was a recent thread about "Session 0", maybe its worth having the "death talk" with your group early on before it happens. Especially in a RP heavy game where IMO it is going to sting everyone more.
ccs |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
TPK.
Depending on the type of game and the table's social contract maybe they're common, or maybe its never happened at your table. How have you handled it in your games? Would you have done it different if the same situation happened with another campaign you've run (or for a game shop group vs a family game?)
We decide what to play next week, & spend the rest of the evening brainstorming/BSing.
Every now & then we have to have a boardgame night while the DM preps.Would I do it differently? Nope, not at all. Doesn't matter where I'm DMing.
As a player how did you take it? Would you rather have the GM fudge rolls to prevent a TPK or prefer the danger of it?
I don't have any problems with TPKs. They happen. If I wanted some guarantee of how a story would end I'd go write a book. Or re-read one.
Or re-watch a movie.Instead I choose to spend a lot of time playing a game where dice rolls are important to exactly how the stories turn out.
Sometimes that means you roll the dice & get a surprise ending.
On fudging rolls: I don't want the DM to fudge ANY roll. If you've got a specific outcome you want to have happen? Then have the balls to just make it happen. Don't dress it up in fake dice rolls.
If instead you're intending to leave it up to chance? Then roll your dice in the open & let's see what happens....
Any advice on how the group can roll with? If you've had it happen and the GM ret-con'd it....how did the group feel about it over time?
Accept it as part of the game & play on. Mourn the characters you've lost as much as they deserve and get on with rolling up new characters.
I'm not a fan of ret-cons. So if a DM did that because he thought "Oh no, I screwed up & killed them!"? I'd loose respect for them.
Darth Grall |
Never had a proper TPK. Usually, my NPCs have goals that the PCs are obstructing. When they're defeated/killed, they're out of the way.
For instance, once the rest of the party fled a fight leaving one PC to fight. What did the baddie do? Gloat, but otherwise leave the pc unharmed. Oh, they beat the party protecting the king? Welp, gonna just kill the king then, no need to off that other "guard".
That said, even if it happened, I'd try to mitigate it by letting at least one pc live, even if I cheese it a bit(you're a ghost now, or you survived but are horrifically scarred/damaged). Not everyone though, but I also have had groups with people who actually like rerolling(for the most part).
Matthew Downie |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Sucks to get a TPK when you are $20 into your $75 super dungeon.
I'm happy to make a new party to continue the adventure where the first one left off (perhaps with some GM creativity to cover the gap). Even if it means, implausibly, there just happen to be four level 13 heroes in the area who no-one ever noticed before.
I hate leaving a storyline unresolved.
MannyGoblin |
MannyGoblin wrote:Sucks to get a TPK when you are $20 into your $75 super dungeon.I'm happy to make a new party to continue the adventure where the first one left off (perhaps with some GM creativity to cover the gap). Even if it means, implausibly, there just happen to be four level 13 heroes in the area who no-one ever noticed before.
I hate leaving a storyline unresolved.
My choice during the 1-2nd edition days. 'I was just exploring and heard the battle and would like to join your group.' 'Welcome tot he group!'
GM 1990 |
Matthew Downie wrote:My choice during the 1-2nd edition days. 'I was just exploring and heard the battle and would like to join your group.' 'Welcome tot he group!'MannyGoblin wrote:Sucks to get a TPK when you are $20 into your $75 super dungeon.I'm happy to make a new party to continue the adventure where the first one left off (perhaps with some GM creativity to cover the gap). Even if it means, implausibly, there just happen to be four level 13 heroes in the area who no-one ever noticed before.
I hate leaving a storyline unresolved.
I've also used the "you find a body bound/unconscious/chained to wall/rolled in carpet". Works for adding a new PC to the game or replacing after a death. Everyone is there to have fun together, if you've got to suspend a little belief to get the person back in the game that session vs sending them home until the next one, then roll with it.
One way to build on the complexity and ongoing nature of your world is to allow the TPK, and rather than starting the new group off on the same story line you can start it months/years in the future. Bring the plot-line up to that period based on the party's failure. While the PCs may know nothing about it, the players sure will and that can be a fun. It gives them an out of game reason to invest in the plotline again, as they see how the TPK resulted in actual in game consequences.
Meraki |
I've never actually had a TPK, as all the parties I've played in or GMed have generally been pretty smart about tactics. Have had several near-deaths in my current campaign, but those were averted by a character with breath of life.
It would really depend on the situation: whether the encounter was way too hard due to my error/miscalculation, whether the PCs had catastrophically bad luck due to die rolls or the enemies fluke-critted four times in a row, that kind of thing. I would probably plan some way for them to be raised, but that would definitely have an effect on the game. (So....that cleric you guys met had you brought back, but guess what he wants in return?) If it was actually my error, though, I'd definitely allow a rewind if the party wanted to go that route. Most people in my groups prefer sticking with the same character the whole way through, because our games tend to be pretty RP-heavy and character-focused. I'd probably discuss it with the players and take into account what they wanted to do, as well.
Ciaran Barnes |
I have TPKd three or four parties. Only once out of malice (I was 17 and a girl showed up, so I wanted to end the game and hang out with her). Once because the party attacked several demon avatars during a diplomatic gathering. Once because the party failed to use the special magic items I gave them for the purpose of defeating the enemy.
Neriathale |
TPKs...
2) Also 1st ed, I was a player in Tomb of Horrors. TPK for walking along a corridor. No-one happy about that one, immediately retconned into allowing the thief to roll to spot the trap before we all died.
That was the basic concept of Tomb of Horrors though - open a door, die, enter a room, die, look at the carvings on the wall, die.
I did tpk a party once, with an over-statted encounter, and that resulted in 'can someone else ref next week.' It was a result of running out of time to write the campaign and just using something random without thinking about the possible consequences.
LOREN PECHTEL 17 |
Never TPKed, never been in a party that was TPKed.
My policy as a DM has always been that the dice won't kill you. There are no save-or-die spells, anything that by the book is a save-or-die takes you to death's door instead. I've never faced a situation like the whole party blowing a save-or-suck but I would not allow it to become a TPK if it happened. I would also hold back if I realized I had put something too powerful in, though.
If it's the party being stupid, though--the closest I have ever come to a TPK was a 1E fireball. An experienced player fired it blindly at an archer that had been harassing them from the darkness. It burned out right in their faces. (I was filling an appropriate number of 5' squares, the squares directly in front of the party got fried.) Anybody that failed their save against it was going to be down if not dead and I would have let the results stand however they came out. I would have given them a save bonus, though, as they were at the very edge of the blast zone and had a lot more time than usual to react. (They were something like 100' from the detonation point.)
ElterAgo |
Personally, I will very rarely 'fudge' the dice. There are however a few exceptions.
1) New players. I will definitely take it easy on a new player for a while. I won't guarantee his safety. But maybe the crit just didn't quite confirm. Or the SoD spell he just failed his save against was a SoS spell. Things like that. I'm also more likely to give them a bit bigger circumstance bonus for clever ideas.
2) When it is my mistake. One time I made an ambush encounter WAY more dangerous than I expected. There were several low level casters, terrain advantages, clever tactics, etc... that worked together extremely well. About 3 rounds in I suddenly realized the PC's had zero chance of even running away from what what was supposed to be a minor scare that gave them clues about a new enemy.
I rapidly reduced levels, hp, the expendables that were about to be used, reduced the level of poisons on the bolts, and eliminated the remaining waves.
There are a couple of things I often do to avoid unexpected results on noncritical encounters. I don't usually give casters very many SoD spells. If a weapon is x3 or x4 weapon, I will treat it like a 19-20/x2 or 18-20/x2 weapon. They get the scare of 'oh crap I just got crit with a heavy pick!' Then a sigh of relief that I 'rolled' badly and they aren't quite con dead.
But other than that, I usually let things fall where they will. The bad guys will behave as intelligently as can be expected for what they are and if the party is too stupid, it just may go badly for them.
Brother Fen |
As a player, I've been involved in a few near TPKs where several PCs died, but not all of them. Having characters die in game gives the campaign gravitas and weight and in my opinion should not be retconned or rewound. That said, I've never been in a total TPK and would probably be bummed out to see everyone die at once.
As a GM, I never intentionally set out to kill the party, so when I feel a potential TPK coming on, I start looking for options to help the party. I don't want to kill them, but I would never rewind events. I've warned players "not to fail" a particular save or two and may strongly hint that they should spend an Hero Point to improve their chance of success.
If there are NPCs that can aid the party nearby, I am not against having them help the PCs when they need it, but only in the most dire of circumstances. No one wants to be the hero of a campaign that has to be saved time and time again by NPCs. I've never fudged a roll to help a PC, but I might give the villain a moment of ego and make some of their tactical choices a bit poorer to give the PCs a bit of breathing room.
Just last week, the players felt like they were nearing a TPK in the second level of Seven Swords of Sin. When sheer firepower couldn't help them, they came up with an unconventional solution. A successful diplomacy roll helped them and they were able to avoid the rest of the encounter where they were definitely on the losing end with their backs to the wall, but I kept the solution consistent with the logic of the game and the encounter and the organic result made everyone appreciate being able to come out with their lives intact.
Boomerang Nebula |
One of my favourite sessions of all time ended in a TPK. I was one of the players and it was a futuristic game set on Mars after it had just been colonised. One of the players did or said something strange and one of the other players got the wrong impression and thought they were a traitor. The party split into two groups that began plotting against each other. Both sides were paranoid and cautious so there were a couple of minor incidents before it all culminated in a huge battle out in the open plains of Mars. The battle was for control of a convoy of vehicles run by a powerful NPC group, which by a hilarious coincidence both PC groups ambushed at almost the same time. The final showdown was a gunfight where everyone died except one player and a large number of NPC troops. The remaining player chased by the NPCs took flight out into the Mars wilderness until he ran out of oxygen.
It probably doesn't sound that great in the retelling and I am sure I am missing some of the key details but at the time it was simply epic.
Kirth Gersen |
Been involved, as player and as DM, with any number of them. Beyond question, they're the most fun games I've ever been involved in. Maybe that makes me weird, but I'm OK with that.
When my PC faces danger, I want it to really be dangerous. Nothing underlines that need like an occasional total wipeout as a reminder.
Haladir |
If I'm GMing and it's veering to TPK territory, I usually adjust bad guy tactics: Maybe they start gloating, maybe they pause and demand the PCs surrender, maybe they switch to nonlethal attacks to take them prisoner. I also play with hero points or plot twist cards, so the PCs have some "get out of death" actions.
But sometimes a TPK is a fitting end to a campaign, such as if the PCs heroically sacrifice themselves to stop the Big Bad.
FuriousManwich |
Early on as a GM I let a group out of a TPK by changing some enemy tactics and fudging roles, giving the 3 last players enough time to get the 2 downed players out of the encounter area and didn't have the enemies pursue. It felt cheap to me and I came to learn it felt cheap to the players as well. I play the enemies with smart tactics and in they don't let up in less the BBEG had plans for capture. One thing I do is the classic "Are you sure?"
As a player I was recently involved in a home game where du to poor tacticts (bunched up real close in a hallway) an animal companion and ranger died, the Gunslinger died, my Paladin was unconscious for 2 rounds before our oracle got me up and I had a lucky crit on the BBEG to kill himbefore dying. After BBEG was dead the mooks ran, and the GM inserted that a 8th level Oracle could raise one character and the grateful spirit of the elf lord who's tomb we were cleansing raised the other three. Felt so dirty after.
Shiroi |
I've TPK'd two times as a DM.
Once, Rappan Athuk and poor decision making skills. When you know that it gets more difficult the deeper you go, try to avoid going deeper if you're not ready. End of the line, they were warned it was a gloves off campaign. They did manage to kill off the enemies with a well placed suicidal Dust of Choking and Sneezing, rolled max con damage and everything failed the save. They felt pretty good about it.
The other time was a deck of many things and someone choosing to draw all 54 cards. It was a really OP campaign and we'd jumped the shark a few times already so when "opposite alignment clones" of the strongest party member suddenly outnumbered the party, we decided it was time to call it a game and get on with something new.
Since then there have been occasional deaths, generally when people left the party or wanted to reroll new characters but also sometimes from poor decisions or bad character designs.
French Wolf |
For me, it depends on how much the players are invested in their characters. If they are generally mking mistakes and the campaign isn't tight then a TPK can be on the cards. But it takes alot for me to kill everyone. I might slot one or two but I prefer to capture, torture, and remove favourite magical items from the characters. That hurts players and sets up some real ambitious revenge situations.
Facial Scars are a fine way to remind someone that they got beat. Each NPC remark really gets on their wick.
Cheers
DalmarWolf |
I've only had one TPK, it was a group of two. They had in their possession a book that three different factions wanted and whom the mentor of one of the characters had been killed over.
This happened at level one (in D&D 5e), two goblins approached them and demanded the book. I figured that the duo of a wizard and bard would easily deal with two goblins either by intimidation, trickery (giving the goblins any sheet of paper would have sufficed), or simply killing them.
The wizard (dragonborn) stepped forward and used her breathweapon, the goblins made the save and she rolled low damage, the bard attacked with her rapier and missed. Then the goblins took down the bard on their turn. Wizard swung her quarterstaff and missed again, only to go down to the goblins.
I had them wake up in jail (accused of the murder of the mentor), and without their gear. The goblins had no reason to murder, they just wanted the book after all. It gave the players another reason to try to solve the murder (now accoponied by a guard to ensure they didn't run) and to recover the book and their gear from the goblins.
Tormsskull |
I've been involved in a ton of tpks on either side of the screen. I think the possibility of a tpk is crucial - if as a player I get the feeling that the GM won't pull the trigger on a tpk, then I tend to take the game less seriously.
It's hard for me to take pride in my character's accomplishments if I know that even had I failed, character death wasn't a possibility.
That being said, if a GM has to interpret the rules in a really strange way, or invalidates a character's ability without a good reason to get a tpk, then it feels like the character or the entire group was boned.
I think the unfortunate part is that players tend to immediately assume the GM messed up if there is a tpk or sometimes even a single character death. Adventuring is a dangerous career. Character deaths should definitely be a possibility.
HowFortuitous |
You can't win a game where it's impossible to lose. As a GM and as a player it is vital that failure not only a thing, but a very real possibility. Who needs full plate when you have plot armor? Why optimize a character when he's guaranteed to succeed?
The entire point of tabletop for me is the removal of invisible walls, and the element of realism that comes with it. The fact that I can look at the GM, say "Screw this. I'm selling everything I own and buying a ship. You can call me Cap'n Chappy. I'm a pirate now." is half the fun of the game. I wouldn't do so, but the possibility is always there. But if I do, maybe the world lights on fire and everybody dies. There are consequences to my actions. My silly ones (To become Cap'n Chappy) or my very serious, plot-defining ones. Without those consequences, without the reality that yes, my actions could lead to the Game Over screen without the safety of an auto-save function? That is what gives the game weight and meaning.
So yes, TPKs need to be embraced. They are the Game Over screen. A GM needs to be willing to say "Look, you guys did this wrong, I gave the "Are you sure?" when you wanted to do something stupid, but you decided to alert the entire castle and charge in, and you died. Nobody is going to revive you. Game over. Next week we'll be making new characters. Level 1. 100 years in the future after the great Worm King has taken over the kingdoms of men, you will be the refugees in a small hamlet on the outskirts of society, where the King of Worms' reach doesn't extend, but his reach is always larger, and the outskirts are ever getting smaller. Roll 4D6, drop 1."
And when they finally do it, when they finally defeat the King of Worms, using the very sword their last character died with, enchanted by the raw hate he felt for the King of Worms in his last moments, that victory will be worth it.
Wheldrake |
One thing I've learnt with Pathfinder, is that death isn't Death, as long as the PCs aren't exceptionally poor or low-level. Death is just a 6000+ gp trip to the nearest temple.
Even on a TPK, if you can finesse some clever way for the dead PCs bodies to be recovered, then they can come back from the dead and simply owe favors and gold to their canny rescuers.
Capture by the bad guys is often a good solution, and can introduce interesting plot twists.
Having NPC allies becomes far more important when there is a chance of them recovering TPK victims' bodies.
Intervention of the Gods can always play a part. Death could be the first step towards mythic tiers, for that matter.
Mike J |
I've played in many different types of groups and never actually had a TPK as a GM or as a player. Having said that, I've *almost* had several TPKs that I was either fighting for or fighting against, depending on the group.
One group I played with treated the game like a table-top combat simulator. This was at level 8+, where death is just an inconvenience. At one game session, one of the players asked with great surprise to another player: "Your character has a name?!?". If there wasn't a character death each session, I took it as a failure on my part as a GM (and so did the players). I did limit myself to CR = APL+3 with no dice fudging and there were several encounters where I was hoping the TPK would come, but it didn't. Sigh.
Most of my experiences, and my preferred style of gaming is the opposite of that - story driven and almost always E6, so death is real. Having a TPK is usually a nightmare as it is very difficult to insert a brand new party into the story, especially if you are somewhere in the middle. In this style of game, the main issues is not "will the PCs succeed" but rather "how will they succeed". So, I fudge dice, change monster tactics, and even make in-game suggestions to avoid a TPK or even a PC death. Luckily, I haven't had to do anything overly obvious to the players.
However, when it comes to the final battle, I treat it like the previous gaming style (dice rolled in open, no fudging, etc.) and what happens, happens. But the story is over at that point.
It all depends on the type of game.