Disturbed by militant "political correctness"


Paizo General Discussion

Liberty's Edge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

After reviewing the "Homosexuality in Golarion" thread it has come to my attention that Paizo is actively promoting the idea that disliking homosexual behavior is evil (both in the real world sense and the Pathfinder mechanical sense) in their products. I can no longer in good conscience support a company that holds such an unethical and bigoted belief, all in the name of "tolerance" (oh, the irony)


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I don't really think that trying to be inclusive and accepting of difference is "political correctness". I think it's really one of the very best qualities of being human.

As for Paizo, I applaud them for including homosexual characters in their products. Gay people are a reality, and always have been. Shouldn't fiction recognize that fact? And yes, I fear that actively promoting an anti-gay agenda, hating and fearing others because they are different, and attempting to curtail their rights as equal human beings, is an evil act. I'm sorry that you disagree.


7 people marked this as a favorite.

It is not bigoted and intolerant to promote diversity and inclusiveness. I doubt you will be missed.


Tolerance is for everyone except intolerants.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I think Mr. Locke is purposefully ignoring the point that is trying to be made. Just as it is a homosexual's right to associate with whomever, it is the same for a heterosexual. Do I agree with the idea of "gays should die"? No. I don't know many who do, even if they think gay people are unequal or sinful.

The point he's making is he's saying that the "opposing viewpoint" is being declared as WRONG WRONG WRONG and everyone who says otherwise should be burned at the stake. While I don't know if this is true, having not read enough of Golarion's works...what if it doesn't float your boat? What if you're straight and don't like gays in THAT way?

Streets run both ways, generally. If he's right, then it IS intolerant. If he's wrong, then he's wrong. Simple. Also "I'm sorry you disagree" is an insult, not an apology, I hope you realize.

...goddammit I didn't want to get sucked back into this board. How'd it get unhidden for me?


And that's your right as a consumer. Isn't capitalism grand?


Sissyl wrote:
Tolerance is for everyone except intolerants.

I hope you realize the irony there and you're saying it FOR that irony. If not, look up Voltaire's quote about "I may not agree".

Grand Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber
Sissyl wrote:
Tolerance is for everyone except intolerants.

It's acceptable to be intolerant of people/opinions that are intolerant.


Machaeus wrote:

I think Mr. Locke is purposefully ignoring the point that is trying to be made. Just as it is a homosexual's right to associate with whomever, it is the same for a heterosexual. Do I agree with the idea of "gays should die"? No. I don't know many who do, even if they think gay people are unequal or sinful.

The point he's making is he's saying that the "opposing viewpoint" is being declared as WRONG WRONG WRONG and everyone who says otherwise should be burned at the stake. While I don't know if this is true, having not read enough of Golarion's works...what if it doesn't float your boat? What if you're straight and don't like gays in THAT way?

Streets run both ways, generally. If he's right, then it IS intolerant. If he's wrong, then he's wrong. Simple. Also "I'm sorry you disagree" is an insult, not an apology, I hope you realize.

...g+@@&*mit I didn't want to get sucked back into this board. How'd it get unhidden for me?

I fear that not every opposing viewpoint is correct. History has shown which side was correct in the movement against slavery, and against racism and segregation, just to name two. I firmly believe that gay rights will be the next great social advance.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

If you believe in equality for homosexual people, you must necessarily believe that it is a good thing, and that it's opposite, excluding homosexual people from equal participation in society, must be an evil thing. Paizo is standing by their convictions, which are most likely shared by the majority of their customers.

In short, don't let the door hit you where Natural Selection split you.


Machaeus wrote:
The point he's making is he's saying that the "opposing viewpoint" is being declared as WRONG WRONG WRONG and everyone who says otherwise should be burned at the stake. While I don't know if this is true, having not read enough of Golarion's works...what if it doesn't float your boat? What if you're straight and don't like gays in THAT way?

"THAT WAY" being recognizing they're a fellow human being with rights? If you don't like gays in THAT WAY, then you're a despicable bigot.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I nominate this for most dangerous thread.


You call that militant? That Paizo occassionally includes gay characters? That they actually allow homosexuals to have the good alignment? That they acknowledge the existence of homosexuality?

Okay.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Bye bye Cory. Regretfully I can't honestly say you will be missed.

Grand Lodge

Adventure Path Charter Subscriber

For those that have posted (and will post before it's over) "you won't be missed" types of comments: you realize you're playing into the OP's thesis, right?

Assistant Software Developer

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I removed a post and some replies to it. Do not use the word 'retarded' in that way.

Sovereign Court

Goresh wrote:
After reviewing the "Homosexuality in Golarion" thread it has come to my attention that Paizo is actively promoting the idea that disliking homosexual behavior is evil (both in the real world sense and the Pathfinder mechanical sense) in their products. I can no longer in good conscience support a company that holds such an unethical and bigoted belief, all in the name of "tolerance" (oh, the irony)

I'm pretty sure that dnd/pfrpg alignment already describes unfairly opressing people as Evil, with a capital E.

SRD wrote:
Evil implies hurting, oppressing, and killing others. Some evil creatures simply have no compassion for others and kill without qualms if doing so is convenient. Others actively pursue evil, killing for sport or out of duty to some evil deity or master.

meanwhile

SRD wrote:
Good implies altruism, respect for life, and a concern for the dignity of sentient beings. Good characters make personal sacrifices to help others.

I suppose that doesn't reference 'dislike', only acting upon that dislike.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Militant fundamentalist: Look out he has a bomb!
Militant Political correctness: Look out! They have .. the opinion that hating other people and condemning them for which way they want to connect the plumbing is a bad thing.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I don't know; I think I, too, am going to start boycotting Paizo products until they stop being bigoted against goblins.

Down with Paizo!
Vive le Galt!


3 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm confused by the use of the alias to make the post? Does the OP not understand that the alias feature doesn't actually keep your identity secret, or is he protesting in-character?


Skeld wrote:
For those that have posted (and will post before it's over) "you won't be missed" types of comments: you realize you're playing into the OP's thesis, right?

So what.


6 people marked this as a favorite.

Irony of people being intolerant of tolerance.

Let me put it this way. You are free to not like homosexuality.
You are free to not like people eating meat.
You are free not to like people who use your left hand. They are your views and you are entitled to them.

What you can't do is expect other people to censor their own work because they depict things common in society that you wish to hide from.

That's what makes people upset and turn on you.

The Exchange RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16, Contributor

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Goresh wrote:
After reviewing the "Homosexuality in Golarion" thread it has come to my attention that Paizo is actively promoting the idea that disliking homosexual behavior is evil (both in the real world sense and the Pathfinder mechanical sense) in their products. I can no longer in good conscience support a company that holds such an unethical and bigoted belief, all in the name of "tolerance" (oh, the irony)

To many contradictions, too many words that are used just completely incorrectly, your post has null content.

"That doesn't mean what you think it means"


7 people marked this as a favorite.
Goresh wrote:
disliking homosexual behavior is evil

Let's get real here for a moment.

Disliking vegetables isn't evil. Scorning or discriminating against someone who likes vegetables and trying to make it financially or societally difficult for that someone to eat vegetables is. If you don't like vegetables, we're all okay with that... just don't interfere with other people and their salads.

Now. Paizo. Paizo doesn't encourage anyone to eat vegetables. They defend vegetable-eating as an option. That's it. They do not deny you or anyone else the right to not eat vegetables. Go nuts. Be a carnivore... I know I am. In no way does Paizo impede your right to dislike anything. Just don't expect the right to evangelize your personal fetishes (ie. intolerance of others).

Tolerance is an ideal. Acceptance is an ideal. Barring common-sense exceptions (ie. where a behaviour is harmful), a healthy person is tolerant and accepting of other people and their preferences. Murder is harmful. Child-molestation is harmful. Paizo clearly labels those as evil and rightly so. Sexual-orientation harms neither partner assuming - just as in hetero circumstances - consensual acts. And you know it.

So, how about we don't go around acting like Paizo should be supporting our personal prejudices? The idea of boycotting a gaming hobby company because you so desperately loathe the acts that don't involve you in any way is... kind of silly.

Liberty's Edge

Could you please be specific as to how you believe Paizo is promoting homosexuality by citing specific Pathfinder rules which corroborate your opinion. I haven't noticed any such rules; but perhaps you could enlighten me.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

How you dare to not tolerate my intolerance?!...uh,oh?


Hey Cory, you were told to take it to the Off-Topic section if you wanted to discuss it further. It was a simple instruction, given several times.
But maybe you just don't care anymore and intend to leave with a huff and burn as many bridges as you can while doing so?


Goresh wrote:
After reviewing the "Homosexuality in Golarion" thread it has come to my attention that Paizo is actively promoting the idea that disliking homosexual behavior is evil (both in the real world sense and the Pathfinder mechanical sense) in their products. I can no longer in good conscience support a company that holds such an unethical and bigoted belief, all in the name of "tolerance" (oh, the irony)

Corey, it repeatedly was mentioned in that thread that the NPC in question is not evil.

Liberty's Edge

A character's sexual orientation has no bearing on how well they perform their role. Providing that type of information may not be necessary to tell the story, but having that information available does offer greater verisimilitude and allows me to provide a richer environment for my players. Sure, Paizo doesn't have to include this info (or any background info, for that matter) but I'm horrible at coming up with this kind of small-detailed information, and I'd much rather pay Paizo to do it.

Keep up the good work, Paizo!


OP, yes, the tide is rapidly turning against bigotry of your preferred flavor. You will be dragged by the hair into the future. Enjoy the ride!

Digital Products Assistant

We already have a discussion about this topic. If you have concerns or issues with the paizo.com community or activity on the messageboards, please email webmaster@paizo.com. Thread locked.

Community / Forums / Paizo / General Discussion / Disturbed by militant "political correctness" All Messageboards