| Apocalypso |
It seems counter-intuitive to me that Hideous characters (very low charisma) are at a disadvantage to Intimidate. Are there any feats or traits that reverse that trend? Where very ugly and scarred characters can use their appearance to *increase* their intimidation?
I understand that Charisma is considered "force of personality" more than appearance. But still, physical appearance contributes to whether people find you charming even though you're an idiot (high charisma) or horrifying even though you have a heart of gold (low charisma).
Muser
|
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
Charisma is also a magnetism, sense of self and so forth. Low charisma characters are easy to push around and appear timid. I can't ever make a low cha barbarian or cavalier due to that.
Anyhow, there's no way to turn negative charisma into an advantage. The character will always be a sideshow for more forceful personalities. There's some traits you can take to up the mechanical side of things, but nothing significant. An inquisitor could use wisdom for Intimidation instead, however. Not sure you want to go there.
| Ryu Kaijitsu |
Charisma is nothing to do with looks, it's force of personality and magnetism.
Choose another stat to dump next time.
not correct as it is now, Charisma is also Beauty, among other things
I think there is also a rogue trick btw which allows to use something else than Charisma on Intimidation
| Apocalypso |
Charisma is nothing to do with looks, it's force of personality and magnetism.
Choose another stat to dump next time.
Decided to go to the rules on this one. Pfsrd defines Charisma:
"Charisma measures a character's personality, personal magnetism, ability to lead, and appearance."And it's not for myself, it's for a barbarian in a game I'm GM'ing. He wrote a backstory that had him captured and tortured and hideously scarred. That's how he became an invulnerable rager. He's also perpetually mistrustful and angry as result. I want to reward him for writing a great backstory that explains his extra tough skin and low charisma.
I could just houserule it, but I was looking for something inside the rules to justify giving a 7' tall, horribly scarred, incredibly angry human man a bonus to intimidate. I didn't think it would be so difficult.
I did find that there's a +4 for larger creatures to intimidate smaller ones, so I think I can easily grant him that +4 towards most Medium and all Small creatures.
| Robert "Steel" Cofrez |
Quote:Charisma is nothing to do with looks, it's force of personality and magnetism.
Choose another stat to dump next time.
Decided to go to the rules on this one. Pfsrd defines Charisma:
"Charisma measures a character's personality, personal magnetism, ability to lead, and appearance."And it's not for myself, it's for a barbarian in a game I'm GM'ing. He wrote a backstory that had him captured and tortured and hideously scarred. That's how he became an invulnerable rager. He's also perpetually mistrustful and angry as result. I want to reward him for writing a great backstory that explains his extra tough skin and low charisma.
I could just houserule it, but I was looking for something inside the rules to justify giving a 7' tall, horribly scarred, incredibly angry human man a bonus to intimidate. I didn't think it would be so difficult.
I did find that there's a +4 for larger creatures to intimidate smaller ones, so I think I can easily grant him that +4 towards most Medium and all Small creatures.
hm, if you want to grant him something consider to add Intimidating Prowess (Combat) or Skill Focus (Intimidate) as a free feat instead, it makes things simpler. Although due to background a free Toughness seems also plausible.
| Anguish |
It seems counter-intuitive to me that Hideous characters (very low charisma) are at a disadvantage to Intimidate. Are there any feats or traits that reverse that trend? Where very ugly and scarred characters can use their appearance to *increase* their intimidation?
I understand that Charisma is considered "force of personality" more than appearance. But still, physical appearance contributes to whether people find you charming even though you're an idiot (high charisma) or horrifying even though you have a heart of gold (low charisma).
Appearance contributes, but isn't key. A big brute of a man whose voice sounds like Mickey Mouse just isn't intimidating. A beautiful woman who swears like a truck-driver just isn't diplomatic.
You've got the tools to model this admirably. They're called Skill Points. A low-Charisma character has something about them that is inherently not intimidating. But... they can work on it. Maybe the squeaky-voice guy learns to not talk while threatening people. He does the best he can with what life dealt him. He'll just never be as good as a big brute of a man who can also use is Vin Diesel voice to verbally threaten people.
Point is your Ability Scores generate your inherent nature. You use Skill Points to compensate as an individual.
| VRMH |
Hideous = high Charisma.
A battle-scarred warrior has a very distinct presence, and can lead younger men into battle. And while you may shudder at the sight of a diseased-ravaged visage, there's an unmistakable fascination that makes you look.
Low Charisma people don't look ugly, they look stupid. Silly. They have the faces you laugh at, instead of laugh with.
| BigNorseWolf |
Hideous = high Charisma.
A battle-scarred warrior has a very distinct presence, and can lead younger men into battle. And while you may shudder at the sight of a diseased-ravaged visage, there's an unmistakable fascination that makes you look.
Low Charisma people don't look ugly, they look stupid. Silly. They have the faces you laugh at, instead of laugh with.
No.
There's lots of different ways to get a bad reaction, what matters for the charisma is that its a bad reaction. It doesn't matter if its a laugh or people moving to the other side of the street when they see you coming.
It seems counter-intuitive to me that Hideous characters (very low charisma) are at a disadvantage to Intimidate.
Intimidate isn't the ability to scare people: its the ability to scare people the right way. If you lift a peasant up by the collar darth vadar style and put a flaming sword in his face he WILL be scared: the trick is to getting him scared enough that he tells the truth rather than telling you what you want to hear or wetting himself and collapsing in a dead heap.
| Dr. Johnny Fever |
Low charisma characters don't necessarily look any less attractive than other characters. Low charisma characters are the ones who break wind at the dinner party with the Duke or, after finding out that the high priestess' son was just slain in battle, asks if he or she can have their stuff. Or who tells jokes and laughs out loud at funerals, or who constantly scratches themselves in public, or squeezes zits in public, or...
<br /><br />
Low charisma people are the ones that you shudder about having to interact with on a regular basis. Physical attractiveness is such a tiny part of that. A great leader might have nothing at all physically attractive about him or her, but they can definitely exude an aura that makes you just WANT to do what they say, or to hear what they have to say about any old topic.
<br /><br />
If an NPC reacts extremely poorly to you in game, it's likely not because of your appearance (barring extreme circumstances), it's probably beacause of something that your low charisma caused you to do or say (yep, without you even telling the DM that you did or said anything) without you even realizing it. It happens in RL everyday to each of us. We all have small affectations that can, and often do, irritate others, even if we don't consciously know we're doing it.
<br /><br />
Charisma, baby, respect it.
| Anguish |
Actually BigNorseWolf I'd defend VRMH's viewpoint. Battle-scars that compel people to obey you are a sign of high-Charisma. You're not pretty, but your features compel people to react the way you want them to. Basically if you work backwards from the result (people are intimidated by you) then you by definition have high Charisma.
| Dr. Johnny Fever |
Oh, and if you want a really cool way to get around charisma hurting your Intimidate, take a level of inquisitor and choose the Conversion Inquisition (instead of a domain) to use wisdom instead of charisma for Bluff, Intimidate and Diplomacy. Not to mention the Inquisitor just oozes coolness anyway.
| ImperatorK |
Decided to go to the rules on this one. Pfsrd defines Charisma:
"Charisma measures a character's personality, personal magnetism, ability to lead, and appearance."
Appearance is just a quarter of what Charisma is made of. Being ugly has nothing to do with low Cha. Just look up some of the monsters in the Bestiaries. There are ABERRATIONS who are the epitome of ugliness, but have quite high Cha scores. Some demons or devils also are terrifying to look at, yet their Charisma is high. Even undead. In PF the more "beautiful" a living corpse is the tougher it is.
Theconiel
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I doubt whether many people on these boards are old enough to remember Fonzie on "Happy Days". Fonzie was "cool" - the character had extraordinary charisma. Fonzie never threatened anyone by word, deed or gesture. He never so much as raised a fist. He glared at people and they backed down. Was/is Henry Winkler amazingly good looking? He didn't have to be - he was Fonzie, for cryin' out loud!
But to the original question, you could use the Skill Focus feat to gain +3 to Intimidate (+6 if you have, I think, 10 skill ranks).
| BigNorseWolf |
Actually BigNorseWolf I'd defend VRMH's viewpoint. Battle-scars that compel people to obey you are a sign of high-Charisma. You're not pretty, but your features compel people to react the way you want them to. Basically if you work backwards from the result (people are intimidated by you) then you by definition have high Charisma.
[Battle scars that compel people to obey] are a method of showing a high charisma.
[Batle scars] is not. Its all about how other people react to them (which is in part related to how people use them)
People can either look at the scars and say "Damn, he's badass, lets follow him" or they can look at the scars and say "Well SOMEONE"s obviously made some bad tactical decisions i think i'm going to stay here... "
EntrerisShadow
|
For the record, while appearance does contribute, I think people are a bit confused about what it means by appearance. It's not just 'appearance' as in 'How good looking you are.' Somebody else already touched on this with the Aberrations and Pit Fiends having high CHA, but their CHA isn't immaterial to their fearsome or ugly visage---it's a part of it.
If you dump CHA, don't expect to have much force of personality, even if that force is just to scare others. (That's actually why I hate Inquisitors using WIS for Intimidate---WIS can contribute in pointing out where they're weakest, but CHA is still required to effectively use that information.)
Speaking of...
Low charisma characters don't necessarily look any less attractive than other characters. Low charisma characters are the ones who break wind at the dinner party with the Duke or, after finding out that the high priestess' son was just slain in battle, asks if he or she can have their stuff. Or who tells jokes and laughs out loud at funerals, or who constantly scratches themselves in public, or squeezes zits in public, or...
Most of these things to me point to a low WIS character. Several of those situations will be acceptable/downright hilarious to the right company, but low-WIS can't see the difference. A low CHA character is the one whose company you couldn't stand because they're simply so dull. Can't get through a joke without giggling and blowing the punchline, mumbles constantly, has no idea how to effectively communicate ideas and is always being misunderstood.
| darth_borehd |
Intimidate is all about charisma. Remember its not just looking scary, it's knowing what really scares people and manipulating them through their fear.
Some perfect examples of intimidate:
In the first Shrek movie, Shrek confronts a group of villages coming to get him. He roars at them and they all just stand there. He has to tell them they need to run away.
The high charisma bard intimidates better than a fighter.
| Azten |
(That's actually why I hate Inquisitors using WIS for Intimidate---WIS can contribute in pointing out where they're weakest, but CHA is still required to effectively use that information.)
Actually, it looks like only Inquisitors with the Conversion and Heresy Inquisitions can do this.
Feral
|
You could also look at as a big scarred barbarian with low charisma being scary but not knowing how to use that fear. Intimidation is about manipulating people through fear, not just making them scared of you.
Maybe he's so scary that people just run in terror when he makes a ruckus rather than timidly doing what they're told.
| Nicos |
EntrerisShadow wrote:(That's actually why I hate Inquisitors using WIS for Intimidate---WIS can contribute in pointing out where they're weakest, but CHA is still required to effectively use that information.)Actually, it looks like only Inquisitors with the Conversion and Heresy Inquisitions can do this.
A cleric can choose an inquisition too.
| Azten |
Azten wrote:A cleric can choose an inquisition too.EntrerisShadow wrote:(That's actually why I hate Inquisitors using WIS for Intimidate---WIS can contribute in pointing out where they're weakest, but CHA is still required to effectively use that information.)Actually, it looks like only Inquisitors with the Conversion and Heresy Inquisitions can do this.
True, but he specifically called out Inquisitors. :)
| Dr. Johnny Fever |
Speaking of...Dr. Johnny Fever wrote:Low charisma characters don't necessarily look any less attractive than other characters. Low charisma characters are the ones who break wind at the dinner party with the Duke or, after finding out that the high priestess' son was just slain in battle, asks if he or she can have their stuff. Or who tells jokes and laughs out loud at funerals, or who constantly scratches themselves in public, or squeezes zits in public, or...Most of these things to me point to a low WIS character. Several of those situations will be acceptable/downright hilarious to the right company, but low-WIS can't see the difference. A low CHA character is the one whose company you couldn't stand because they're simply so dull. Can't get through a joke without giggling and blowing the punchline, mumbles constantly, has no idea how to effectively communicate ideas and is always being misunderstood.
<br /><br />
Then Diplomacy would be based upon wisdom instead of charisma. The ability to stop yourself from performing actions detrimental to your social interactions, like the ones that I mentioned, is what separates this from wisdom IMHO. Having the willpower to stop smoking when you know its bad for you would be a will save, hence wisdom. Being able to not nervously shift from one foot to the other while talking to the king is diplomacy, and hence charisma. Its as much about being confident in your nonverbal body language as it is your verbal social interactions (again IMHO).| Ryu Kaijitsu |
Low charisma characters don't necessarily look any less attractive than other characters. Low charisma characters are the ones who break wind at the dinner party with the Duke or, after finding out that the high priestess' son was just slain in battle, asks if he or she can have their stuff. Or who tells jokes and laughs out loud at funerals, or who constantly scratches themselves in public, or squeezes zits in public, or...
That is social behavior, doesn't really relate to Charisma but more to Wisdom and Intelligence, and acceptance of actions like those also differ per various cultures.
A high Charisma person could get a round of applause or friendly laughter when farting at that dinner, could get the stuff of the dead person if it asks for it, and everyone would laugh at their jokes at the funeral even the priest.
I dumped Strength but I think my character should be really good at hitting and damaging things. Because he's um, tough.
Can I use my Con to get hit and damage bonuses?
I wrote a really good backstory too!
Intimidation can be done through sheer power of Presence (Charisma), with brute force (Strength), or clever planning (Intelligence). You can get the skill to work with one of these attributes already if you pick some abilities either the Rogue or Godling grants (and other classes/archetypes), or some feat.
There are already options to have Con/Dex/Wis/Cha modifiers to certain attacks and damage, or to AC already as well.
| Joyd |
The difference between a dumped charisma score and a nice charisma score is barely perceptible in play anyway. Even if you don't really like any of the (relatively small) number of ways to use another stat for Intimidate, simply by putting points into intimidate (something most characters don't do), you're going to be among the best intimidators in the party initially, and eventually be the best, unless there's a high cha character who's also putting points into intimidate. Stats aren't a very important factor in how good you are at skills, and they get less important as you level up. People tend to grossly overestimate the difference between an 8 and a 12. (The difference is "very small, so small that if you didn't tell anyone what number was written on the sheet, they probably couldn't tell based on the results of your rolls.")
| The Crusader |
You could also look at as a big scarred barbarian with low charisma being scary but not knowing how to use that fear. Intimidation is about manipulating people through fear, not just making them scared of you.
Maybe he's so scary that people just run in terror when he makes a ruckus rather than timidly doing what they're told.
If you've seen the movie, The Godfather, Luca Brazi is a perfect example of the CHA dump stat. He's big, yes. He's scary looking, yes. But, he can't even talk to someone without rehearsing his speech, and then he stumbles all over his words, and looks like an idiot when talking.
Now, have him backing up Don Corleone (very high CHA), who is making the threats (i.e. "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse."), and that is intimidating.
| mach1.9pants |
Yeah you might be slightly worse than a high CHA Intimidate maxed PC but you'll still be good. If you care at Skill focus and max it out.
And I can't remember if it is specifically spelled out in Pf but it is normal to allow different abilities to apply to skills if the DM sees fit, like crushing something with your bare hands to use STR bonus for Intimidate.
| David knott 242 |
Charisma is also a magnetism, sense of self and so forth. Low charisma characters are easy to push around and appear timid. I can't ever make a low cha barbarian or cavalier due to that.
Anyhow, there's no way to turn negative charisma into an advantage. The character will always be a sideshow for more forceful personalities. There's some traits you can take to up the mechanical side of things, but nothing significant. An inquisitor could use wisdom for Intimidation instead, however. Not sure you want to go there.
Actually, I found exactly one way to turn a negative charisma modifier into an advantage: A wild rager can reduce the save DC to avoid becoming or remaining confused by dumping his charisma as low as possible (the save DC being 10 + barbarian level + Cha modifier). Frankly, I think the developers should have made that 10 + 1/2 barbarian level + Wis modifier, since wisdom is the only stat that would not make the save more difficult as it got higher.
| BigNorseWolf |
Whenever I'm tempted to dump-stat charisma, I remember the perfect film example of a 7 charisma: the Stapler Guy from "Office Space".
While that might be fun sometime, it's not how I view most of my heroic characters...
i think the ranks he got in profession: arson seemed to pay off in the end...
| Anlerran |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Whenever I'm tempted to dump-stat charisma, I remember the perfect film example of a 7 charisma: the Stapler Guy from "Office Space". While that might be fun sometime, it's not how I view most of my heroic characters...
Precisely.
My biggest RPG hate is players who dump Chr, then insist that their character is cool or impressive or 'beautiful' (Penny Arcade, I'm looking at you...)
By all means take a substitute feat or archetype if it's in the rules, but insisting the GM handwave things like Intimidate is pure munchkinism...
Muser
|
I roleplay my low cha characters as timid or minionish. An ekujae inquisitor of Abadar of mine is a real smooth talker, but people need to constantly pester her to appear more menacing and forceful, because her sheepish nature doesn't really go well with interrogations. Really good people person, but tends to squirm when people shout out loud. Even her sword has more sense of presence :D
Then there's my dwarven sohei, who does ooze authority from every pore of his being thanks to his background as a notable colonial figurehead and warleader, but he's pretty worthless in pushing people around and would rather be left to deal with combat situations and engineering than be forced to pester people for provisions or ask for reinforcements. He's learned some statecraft and rhetorics(ranks in Diplomacy and Sense Motive), but that only makes him competent, not successful.
| gnomersy |
Why not just have him drop a 10 into Cha making him your average guy in terms of all that then grab the STR to Intimidate feat or Skill focus or both or give one to him for free if your campaign is going to be painfully combat oriented.
It makes perfect sense sure he's fugly to look at with his scars but he's got a decent build and a forceful personality coupled with not being useless when interacting with people. At a plus 0 mod he's not going to be a natural charmer but with enough work and practice he's got a shot of getting people to come around to liking him.
Theconiel
|
Feral wrote:You could also look at as a big scarred barbarian with low charisma being scary but not knowing how to use that fear. Intimidation is about manipulating people through fear, not just making them scared of you.
Maybe he's so scary that people just run in terror when he makes a ruckus rather than timidly doing what they're told.
If you've seen the movie, The Godfather, Luca Brazi is a perfect example of the CHA dump stat. He's big, yes. He's scary looking, yes. But, he can't even talk to someone without rehearsing his speech, and then he stumbles all over his words, and looks like an idiot when talking.
Now, have him backing up Don Corleone (very high CHA), who is making the threats (i.e. "I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse."), and that is intimidating.
"Give us the gate key."
"I have no gate key.""Fezzik, tear his arms off."
"Oh, you mean this gate key."
Theconiel
|
Theconiel wrote:"Give us the gate key."
"I have no gate key."
"Fezzik, tear his arms off."
"Oh, you mean this gate key."That's a horrible example! Fezzik had TONS OF CHARISMA!!!
/pun =)
True.isn't Fezzik a wonderful character?
Don't talk to me about puns. I tried to name our pet tortoise, "Studs Turtle". Fortunately, better judgment prevailed.
| Dragonchess Player |
It seems counter-intuitive to me that Hideous characters (very low charisma) are at a disadvantage to Intimidate. Are there any feats or traits that reverse that trend? Where very ugly and scarred characters can use their appearance to *increase* their intimidation?
There's the Bully social trait (+1 to Intimidate checks, Intimidate is always a class skill). Others have mentioned Intimidating Prowess and Skill Focus (Intimidate). Some classes/archetypes also gain bonuses to Intimidate checks.
Ultimately, low Cha characters have enough options to overcome the ability score penalty to social skills and be effective. It just takes a bit of effort.
| boring7 |
As the Sage once said, "a Negative attribute should NEVER be a positive, that's why they're 'dump stats' in the first place."
Actually, I recently watched a decent example of this in the terrible series Samurai Champloo. There was a particularly ugly big-ass barbarian who was hideous and scary and...pitiable. He was always trying to hide his ugly because he didn't like the way he looked and even when someone else was trying to use him for intimidation factor he could only get a +2 circumstance bonus from, "I have a big guy" while doing the intimidation himself. When the big guy talked you just felt sorry for him.