Like a) how we found caches of Chemical weapons in Iraq that weren't supposed to be there, or how we found Migs and other things he was required to destroy?
Number of WMDs noted in your post: zero.
Or maybe b) How the EIT allowed us to verify information after the fact?
Ah yes how wonderful EIT has succeeded in literally telling us what we already knew.
How many dead innocents are you comfortable with?
Link gives nothing. Again, congrats to torture for telling us what we already knew.
No see torture worked because we captured Bin Laden right after we started tortu - wait, we didn't? Welp!
Enjoy literally being a torture apologist.
The ends NEVER justify the means, we do not get to choose when, and when not to be civilized.
Bingo. Give the man his prize.
Enjoy literally being a torture apologist.
Incoming lock detected.
5...
4...
3...
2...
1...
Enjoy literally being a torture apologist.5...
4...
3...
2...
1...
He is attempting to justify and apologize for torture.
I am using literally, erm, literally, here.
Aaaaaaaand boom goes the dynamite!
RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8
|
I am sorry, but where do you get that from?So you support taking them out and shooting them too. Good to know.The ends never justifies the means. I do not care if so called EIT helped or not. We should treat all prisoners as per the Geneva conventions. Whether they deserve it or not, whether they would treat us the same or not.Holder points to EIT as part of the 'moasic of sources' used to catch OBL.
And of course let's not forget Panetta himself saying EIT led to Bin Laden. So McCain doesn't understand Panetta either.
Would you rather we treat the detainees at Gitmo per Geneva?
You want to treat all prisoners per the Geneva conventions. Per Geneva enemy combatants who don't hold to Geneva don't benefit from their protections. Thus to treat them per Geneva, they don't receive any protections.
Chief Creative Officer, Publisher
|
Bugleyman wins!
I'm going to "extraordinarily render" this thread into oblivion in some god-forsaken Syrian "black site," because I hereby declare it an Enemy Combatant under the Paizo Convention.
That's the thing about unlimited executive power, you see. The executive gets to set the rules.
And since "Publisher" is as close to "executive" as we get around here, I am going to do my duty to God and country and pour water into the mouth and nose of this thread until it thinks it is going to die.
Then I'm going to kill it.
Because I can. Because I am, in a word, "extraordinary."
USA! USA! USA!
On a serious note: Please take discussions about supporting torture or not supporting torture to a message board about politics and torture.
It's going nowhere good here.