In ToD, the party gets VPs if Lavinia is elected mayor and lose VPs if Meravanchi is elected mayor. My players couldn't have cared less about who was mayor, considering they were busy trying to prepare for the invasion, so they didn't help Lavinia. This ended up allowing Meravanchi to win. How is this going to affect future adventures?
I don't see how it affects them, at all - except for making L's case even sorrier.
IMC - the PC's failed in the assault when they let the pearl go off. I estimated approx 30 survived the savage onslaught. Lavinia was one of those and is busy trying to rebuilt the city from scrap.
It all works out in the end, no matter who is in charge of what.
In ToD, the party gets VPs if Lavinia is elected mayor and lose VPs if Meravanchi is elected mayor. My players couldn't have cared less about who was mayor, considering they were busy trying to prepare for the invasion, so they didn't help Lavinia. This ended up allowing Meravanchi to win. How is this going to affect future adventures?
*SPOILERS* The brief answer is, not in the slightest bit. Within a few more adventures, they'll be off to the Abyss, and who's in charge of Farshore won't really matter to them--they'll have much bigger fish to fry.
|
As presented in the magazine the player's should have their patron as part of their best intrests. The fact that she does not get elected in you campaign should not be a problem, but if they dont care about her all that much you may have a little trouble getting them to rescue her later from Vanthus. Im interested to see how this part of the campaign proceeds when I get here because when we played Shackeled City my character (the younger brother to Zachery Aslaxin II) became lord mayor instead of what the book suggested.If one of the player's decides that they want to go a similar route and try his hand at managing a outpost (especially if hes part of the Dawn Council) Ill roll with it.