You all miss the point. Thrown or not damage is higher straight out of the box than any other class. Coming from a finesse style. Completely silly
Search Posts
My point is thrown or melee the swashbuckler doesn't need to spec for any damage. That outdoes every class
Yes that's only one of the 2 to 4 attacks you could have. A fighter speced for throwing will never keep up
For a wizard maybe
Tenth level. One attack. One throwing knife. One grit point. 1d4 + str + 20 and no attack penalty. How's your fighter or barbarian compare?
Playtest swashbuckler and tell me how it goes. Bloodrager is bad at everything is why. Bad spellcasting and melee. It's an even worse magus
This race seems really neat but the natural weapon damage is screwy, they are missing racial skill bonuses and no natural armor? They are sentient lions. They should have all the racial traits of lions. They are portrayed as somewhat larger than lions. I did like that pounce and rake are available as alternatives to feats but the list is lacking grab as well. Adding all those racial traits might seem powerful but one must consider they cant hold weapons and their armor is extremely expensive |