I have a player that's looking to play an Alchemist, they're really taken by the class. However they've read online and are concerned about their effectiveness.
A lot of those issues seem to be "not as good as class X at doing Y". However in a party of two (other class likely to be a Ranger, but not known yet) I can see how being OK at a lot of things and not great at much could actually be very useful.
But at the same time, the Alchemist seems like a bit of a force multiplier and therefore with a smaller party wouldn't benefit as much from that side of their kit - and if they're not pulling their weight things are going to get tricky.
Is this destined for disaster, or might it actually pan out?
We've decided that, as it's our first step into Pathfinder from 5E, that we won't be doing any homebrewing - not least because a not insignificant part of why we're switching to Pathfinder is so I don't have to spend so much time balancing things.
Any thoughts from you more experienced Pathfinders welcome!