t3hd0n's page

a friend got me the printed book for my birthday, i can't find any erratas online. has there been any changes since the first printing?

since there are now 3 types of classes that can be chosen at first level (base, alternate and hybrid) the first thing that came to mind were the archetypes with abilities from other base classes. The sensei comes to mind, but there are other examples. I think paizo is doing a wonderful job of keeping things balanced by ways of restricting multiclassing, which can lead to unforeseen class combos that have a devastating power creep (3.5 scout/ninja anyone?)

Much like the anti-paladins reclassification as an alternate class, I feel some older archetypes should be looked at and considered to be hybrid classes, and maybe with some spruce up in a newer book. ;)

If the target of an intended charge disappears, either because of a wizard readying a dimension door or a monk jumping to safety, what options would the charging character have? Would these options change depending on where the target ended up?

i thought of something; a magus running around with a cold iron weapon adding +2 equivalencies at level 5. level 5 pc wealth should be about 10k, yet buying a +2 cold iron weapon starts at 16k

i didn't take the time to look at the numbers at every time the bonus goes up, but at 17th bumping up a masterwork cold iron weapon to +5 is comparable to a drop in the bucket, but bumping an already +5 do a +10 equivalency equals 3/4ths character wealth for that level.

thoughts?

I would like to see everyone's opinion on multiclassing with a non-core class. some classes are clearly a hybrid class, ex the magus being the most recent.

personally i feel dirty when considering a multiclass between two non-core classes. i'll have to pull from 3.5 because pathfinder hasn't been around long enough to have the sheer amount of optional base classes, but say a multiclassed duskblade / spellthief just feels wrong for some reason.

So I had this problem come up at a table recently. an NPC had the shield spell active, and halfway through a two hour fight with said NPC (was about a minute ingame XD) told them where the AC came from.

Now one of the players has been playing since the 70's and started quoting how the shield spell is a dependent on where the caster is facing. I looked it up and how to handle a shield spell is described under the 3.0 FAQ. I've only played 3.5 and PFRPG but it was my understanding that they stripped all of the facing rules out of the game in the 3.5 versions and assumed that the shield spell saying the shield in front of you (but not giving any mechanic to define 'in front of you' or how to get around it) was fluff.

the other reason why i feel the shield spell shouldn't have the 3.0 method of operation is that they say in the 3.0 FAQ that it operates "like a tower shield" 3.5 tower shields don't give you ac bonus' only in front of you, its a straight +4. I've scoured paizo and wotc for some type of ruling on the 3.5 shield spell but found nothing :-\

would it be too hard to list *how* said item is "imperfect-ed"?
if the product is still good enough to sell then i'm sure someone would be willing to buy it if they actually know whats wrong with it.

Hi. What, as a player, can i do if a session i participated in never got reported to my character? its been around a year since the event and i don't see it on my character or my girlfriends character.

thanks