![]() ![]()
![]() Thanks Cyouni, this is very helpful! I completely missed that point! With the character level added to the proficiency bonus, the Signifer stats are not that much out of reach anymore. Regarding the asymmetrical design, I can understand its value from the GM's point of view, but I don't find it that great from a player's perspective: as a player, I want to stand on equal footing with a NPC that should be roughly equivalent to my PC. Deriven Firelion: you seem to regret that a single PC of equal level wasn't much of a challenge for a group. I find it rather normal and logical: IMHO a single character should be of a higher or much higher level to be a threat to a whole group. In PF1, TL was equal to CL+1 or +2, maybe it was overestimated. Anyway, thanks everyone for your answers, it'll be easier for me to understand the rules now! ![]()
![]() Hello there, Not sure yet if I'm going to jump into 2e or not, so I was doing a little research in order to understand the rules. I began with character creation, and you find me struggling already... I tried to create a Hellknight signifer, and then realised that one such NPC has been published (Hellknight Paravicar, Creature 11, from Character Guide). And its stats baffle me. I must certainly miss something obvious, because I don't understand how it has, for instance, such high AC and HP or saves, so much higher that what I got with my mock-up character. - from Creature level and Divine spontaneous spells I assume it must be a 11th level sorcerer.
- with likely no proficiency in heavy armors and wearing a +1 Hellknight Plate, its AC, as far as I understand it, should be 10+7 =17.Yet it's listed as being AC 30! How is it possible? - being expert in will saves and having +3 Wis, its Will save should be +7. It actually is +23. What could possibly explain such a huge difference? Thanks for your help! ![]()
![]() Thanks James for your answer! I'm sorry I will sound as a real mo(d)ron now, but it happens I do some statistics IRL.
Thus my assumption is that it wasn't quite pure luck... - Nordom out! :-) ![]()
![]() Thanks Plausible Pseudonym and Luthorne for your detailed answers. I would hate to appear mono-maniac, but what struck me for LN is also true for NG,LG and CG then :-( That's a shame, stories do not only need antagonists, but also side protagonists of various morality. I surely can understand that a bestiary needs more evil and chaotic creatures, but /that/ many? ![]()
![]() Feros wrote:
Oh. Thanks for your quick answer! Odraude must have misread the entries when he saw LN outsiders, but assuming they were the formians was actually my mistake. I really thought they were native outsiders from Mech... er... Axis. I hoped Paizo would give neutral creatures some love and get rid of the usual good vs evil cliches, but I believe we'll have to wait until the next bestiary... I'm still curious about the new monsters, though. |