irifan's page

1 post. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


Tarondor wrote:
Falco271 wrote:
Tarondor wrote:
So on that subject, I could cut these suckers by at least a third if I didn't give full characters. Are those useful to people? Or would a brief list of the feats at the heart of the character be just as good or better?

As your asking: I would concentrate on a few builds that capture your imagination. Builds that actually stand out. With the APG, options are limitless, and going for all these possible builds compares to not seeing the forest through the trees. And including all ancestry feats etc is not really needed, show some very synergistic stuff and be done with it. you gotta leave something for players to do for themselves....

There are already some nice repositories of characters out there. Ravindork, GentlemanDM, where people can find ideas for complete builds, if needed.

I'd be happy to have more people comment on this.

First of all I am really grateful for the in depth guides of yours and the many explanations.

Pathfinder 2e is a new and fresh system, so having full characters is quite a big help to me as they help me to get a good grasp of the rules and the synergies. But this value will diminish over time or if there are already one or two other comprehensive guides with characters for a given class available.

I think it also depends how much fun do you have fleshing out all these characters and how much time you need to invest in doing so. Perhaps full characters for blue and green options might be a compromise and only a brief explanation why an other character is only orange or red.