dnjscott's page

This is kind of an eye of the beholder question and I don't want to start an argument but I'm just curious, how do you feel about the ratio of rules to lore in the recent books? Feels like they are way more lore heavy than 1e.

I would like more rules but I am curious if I am an outlier. I know 1E ran away with rules after a while but I think they could do more crunchy content.

This is the first thing I haven't really liked...

1) It just looks like a feat chain which I got way burned out on on PF1

2) The potential overlap with signature skills and weapon proficiencies bugs me - do you just lose all benefit?

3) It seems way too situational, like you would never really take it... all the 'on a boat' stuff

4) I don't like not being able to take the archetype until level 2

YMMV but not liking this

I have long thought that chains of feats should instead be one feat that gets more powerful as you level up, instead of you essentially having to take the feat three times. It's pretty hard to keep up with feat bloat, otherwise...