W0LF0S's page

Aha, that makes sense then. Thanks for the clarity!

I'm looking over the Cleric and Druid, and I am confused by their level 20 feats, Miraculous Power and Hierophant's Power. As far as I can tell, both classes have total access to their spell lists barring rarity restriction, so why do both feats say to add two 10th level spells to their list of spells known?

Let's add a followup question to this. The Gesarme Bonus Feat list includes Spring Attack for some reason. Can someone explain the benefit of this to a mounted character? Ride-By Attack seems to me to be doing the same thing but better.

Additionally, why aren't its prereqs (Dodge/Mobility) included? Why would a mounted character take these?

Final scenario: my Cavalier gets high enough in levels that he's taken all the bonus feats but Spring Attack. He hasn't spend regular feats on its prereqs. What happens when he gets another bonus feat from his class feature? He can't take the last listed feat, so does he get a bonus feat or no feat?

So, I'm having a dispute with one of my players. He's playing a Gendarme archetype (Cavalier) and chosen his level 1 bonus feat: Spirited Charge. His argument is that bonus feats don't need prereqs, and he's using this post as the basis of his argument: http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2l7ns&page=369?Ask-James-Jacobs-ALL-your-Qu estions-Here#18422

I disagree. I believe that James was talking specifically about single feats granted as part of a class feature which specifically mention not needing to meat prereqs and not about whole lists of bonus feats (I'm eyeballing the fighter which also fails to mention anything about prereqs). I do see that several lists include language that disregards bonus feats like the Ranger's Combat Style list, but that language isn't present for the Gendarme or the Fighter.

Who's right? What evidence do I point to? If my player is right, then have I been wrong about Fighters this whole time?