![]() ![]()
![]() Charles Evans 25 wrote:
Though it sounds odd to say i do not see the need to worry about the spell in use so much. Makes enough sense to me. I was going to point out the classic Bag of Holding for an example... It needs secret chestand that spell places a chest on the ethereal plane. The contents of the bag are just an unspecified extra-dimensional space. Pretty classic i would say.
![]()
![]() Chris_Johnston wrote: After careful review, this is definitely my favourite of the bunch. A cool, unique effect that has a great visual and is well thought out. Reading this answers all of my questions about it, but I can think of a ton of ways to use it. Congratulations! I am in total agreement here. A simple, yet wondrously designed item. Great work Jacob, i cannot wait to see what is next!![]()
![]() CouncilofFools wrote: Being a newcomer this year, I wasn't as privy to last year's guidance so I was coming in fresh and naive. I didn't know where to look for guidance and only discovered some after my submission. Is it at all possible to incorporate your guidance for this year's submissions into next years rules, FAQ or whatever in the announcement? I can second this, also being brand new here (happy to worm my way in though). I'll admit to being a little glum but now that i have gone through all the winning entries i see where mine was likely wanting...Spoiler:
I used the same unfavored format as the "Crossing" and might have been a tad underpowered/unflashy. That being said, my wholehearted congratulations to the 32 creators! Good luck to all in the following rounds as we all look forward to seeing what you have planned next! ![]()
![]() I had wondered about the water situation... leaving a bubble or if the glamer would compensate. I had assumed it would be rather easy to see though. My question with countering invisibility was detect magic. As it reads if someone is caught in the cone on the third round it seems you know their location... but i was never sure how to explain it to my players. Does the caster see them as a big aura thing moving around the exact location or what?
![]()
![]() Ross Byers wrote:
But no other familiar would have opposable thumbs. I just foresee a lot of (magic)item use and crazy stuff going on. I know familiars are not as smart as their masters but they certainly have a leg up on their non-magical relatives. Might be worth a feat for balance is all...![]()
![]() I am a big fan of Gnomes... the tinkering/alchemist/wizard/bard/prankster-types or otherwise. While i always appreciated their cousinly status with Dwarves (though i have never approved of the Con adjustment and i applaud the Int change mentioned) i can accept the Fey association. Whenever i have faced complaints on Gnomes (usually what are they and how do they fit into anything) i try to point to Tom Bombadil...
|