Voqu's page

2 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


Captain Morgan wrote:
25speedforseaweedleshy wrote:

wizard are the only class become significantly weaker instead of stronger in pc1 and 2

flexible caster archetype couldn't save them

expect paizo to produce some miracle new runelord archetype to save wizard seem overly optimistic

Eh. I would put some qualifiers on that. I'd argue the caster baseline just got raised in general between the refocus changes and spell buffs, wizards are probably strong than before overall. But they aren't relatively stronger compared to other classes.

The other thing is the specific nerf (limited choices for curriculum spells) is explicitly written to allow the player and GM to collaborate and add more thematically appropriate spells, which is much cleaner than trying to homebrew the whole class. So at most tables you should be fine, but I have no idea how that works on PFS.

Other problems, like boring feats or bad focus spells, aren't new, and wizards got small improvements there in the remaster. These are also problems that you can bypass with multiclassing. I recognize this feels bad to have to do, but that's probably an expectation adjustment people should make. Cuz I agree with you that Paizo probably won't publish a miracle archetype that fixes everything.

You could also add another spellcasting dedication like witch to gain extra spells and abilities.


Arkat wrote:
Ectar wrote:


Mythic proficiency sounds bonkers, even if limited in scope and number of uses per day.

Not worried about an occasional +10 to a skill check.

If it's 1 chance every day I can see that working. Harrower Archetype allowed something similar with bonuses or penalties dependant on the success. At high levels dependant on level of casting the ritual you could guarantee a critical success.