Kabran Bloodeye

Treyu's page

Organized Play Member. 8 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 Organized Play character. 1 alias.


RSS


Crimson Jester wrote:
I see this mainly for two weapons, the gauntlet(which in some ways should already be one, but lets not quibble) and the spiked chain.

I can remember seeing Jet Li do some very funny trip attempts and general fighting with chains and ropes, combined with fighting bare handed, in some of his movies. so this would fit the idea of the monk as a martial arts fighter.


KaeYoss wrote:

The bard's player seems to take to this character - which you can see by the vigor with which he looks through splat books for stuff to boost his character. It seems the playtest of that class is secure.

So far, I allowed him a feat from Complete Something that allows him to cast spells during bardic music, which is something I feel should be possible without any feat, anyway.

He'll later take a Versatile Performer (that's its name I think) that allows him to use one type of perform for other types, i.e. max one perform skill and use them all. I think this helps to keep the requirements for bardic music reasonable

Also, there's a feat that replaces concentration (well, spellcraft right now) with perform for concentration checks. I don't know whether I'd have allowed that during 3.5, but since I think that concentration should be a caster level check + key ability rather than spellcraft, anyway, I'm going to allow it.

I'm the Bard.

The Feat is from Complete Mage, it is called Melodic Casting and it replaces Concentration with Perform and adss the ability to cast during perform.

Versatile Performer does not max every Perform skill. Only one per Intelligence Modifier.

Until now I can say that I really like the Bard and most of the changes in PFRPG


I really like this.

Very good solution!!!


I did a Character Sheet for Beta version of PFRPG and made also a D&D 3.5 version:

PFRPG-Beta.

D&D 3.5.

I would love to get some criticisms!


I liked this mechanic on the spot.

There is still a versatility but it is more simple than the Point System. And that suits the Babarian well.

I will playtest this version in the CotC Campaign over the next weeks.


and your character safes a lot money. Just one weapon all the time.


Hi.

I will dm the Shackled City campaign. Now, while building the characters, one of my player asked if he can play a drow with an evil alignment.

So heres the question to the people, who finished the Path already: Is it possible? Had any of your Players played an evil char, if yes, did it work?

Bye


Hi!

Okay, this is my first post here.
I although prefer that races shouldn't make a big deal.
You'll get some changes to your attributes score and some specials, but i think that all other changes should come from classes and the idea, that each player had from the version of race, that he plays.

I had seen - and played by myself - arrogant elves, that cared only for the destruction of orcs, for example, and on the other side i've seen and played elves that cared for the greater good and hadn't made a big deal with their elfhood.

I've read 'bout changes of 4th Ed., most on german boards - cause i am a german guy, and i want to say an excuse to all, that will be insulted by my poor english - and all i could see IS a diablo like version of DnD. Until now all they talked about is fighting. I heared nothing 'bout real roleplaying. WoTC prefers style at the moment. And in my opinion they don't care about wishes of the players. So many found elves too strong or too important in DnD and now: elves and eladrin as standard races. Why?

Ok. This had to come out at me at the moment.

and to KaeYoss' excuse I want to say, that, as a not native speaker like him, I thought that approved has the same meaning like agree.