|2 people marked this as a favorite.|
I guess if you don't agree with how it's been done or if you think it's broken, you don't have to use it? I'm perfectly content with nobody else wanting to use this, I just figured that I would share it and see what people thought about it. I, personally, don't see this class as being broken and unbalanced.
I certainly won't be using it and it's great that you're fine with being the only one to use it since that'll probably be the case. I do however think it's pretty disingenuous to say that you posted it to "share it and see what people thought about it" and then proceeded to ignore any criticism and insult those who offered suggestions/comments by telling them that "they don't know the original class". As Ciaran said, you asked for comments, but those seem to be pretty unwelcome as long as they're not praising you for all the work you did.
Concerning the criticism, I don't personally consider an Int based spontaneous caster to be "nonsensical". It's a unique aspect of the class that aside from the amount of skill points gained (and considering that the Beguiler is designed to stand in for a Rogue in terms of skill use, it's not a flaw so much as it is a design decision that you seem to disagree with) is not mechanically too different from casting from Cha and provides a really interesting thematic difference to Cha based spontaneous casters. Edit: Thinking on it, you can even make the Sorcerer an Int based spontaneous caster, so I don't really see your argument here.
Spontaneous casting in pathfinder comes from a caster who uses his force of personality to evoke the innate magic within him. The sage bloodline sorcerer you mention is described as being studious and delving deep into arcane tomes to drive his magic through knowledge rather than personality. Without enshrining some aspect of a studious tradition behind the beguiler class, it still seems ridiculous to me to think about a beguiler being deep in study on long nights when he could be out carousing or stealing or manipulating fools from their coins. But that's just me so I'll concede this point.
As for it being Int reliant....that's the point? How is it any more broken than an Investigator, doubly so if you look at the Empiricist archetype. If a Beguiler takes Clever Wordplay then it becomes two skills that now use Int instead of Cha, their spellcasting, and two class abilities. I don't see this being a flaw so much as "It's an Intelligence based class, therefore, it uses Intelligence primarily".
It's not that it's Int reliant. It's that Int is the only stat it needs to be workable. It governs practically every aspect of the class: skills, using magic devices, social abilities (with the trait), attack and damage rolls (with the feat focused shot), etc. Most importantly it defines the spellcasting for the class and let's be clear: this is a 9 level spontaneous caster with over 100 spells known (and easy access to any spells it doesn't have on its list with wands and staves), an investigator with 6 level prepared casting does not compare to this level of power creep.
To me the most worrying and broken aspect of the conversion is arcane deceit. You've said above that the limiting aspect of beguiler spellcasting is that its spell list is so constrained. Well guess what? this ability blows that constraint out of the water. It gives them access to ANY spell of up to 8th level, that's insane. If you don't see how broken that is there's no hope for you or this conversion.
Edit: Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but honestly it seems like you just don't like the Beguiler and/or think the original is terribly broken.
I don't have any particular hate/dislike for the original class. It has its quirks that I'm not crazy about and it's not the style of play I prefer, but I've DMed more than a few without problems. That said, I certainly don't think the WotC beguiler fits within the pathfinder universe without major revisions and you seem too focused on carrying those oddities through despite any outside commentary you've received. Since you've demonstrated a complete lack of manners and care in dealing with criticism this will be my last post in this thread, I have better things to do with my time than to argue with a brick wall.