![]() ![]()
Dragnmoon wrote:
I just downloaded all 6 files and without issue. I use chrome and Acrobat Reader 9.![]()
0gre wrote: It would never be a do-or-die thing because the cleric of Pharasma would never prepare the spell in the morning. As it is my only option for a 3rd level domain spell when I select the Souls and Death Domains, it "may" be prepared. I went and read up on Pharasma in the Pathfinder Chronicles Campaign Setting, so its not a spell I will be casting often if at all. Its odd that Animate Dead is the third level spell for the Souls Subdomain as Pharasma is the only deity with access to it according to table 2-12 in the APG. This was not a shot at any gm I have played under, the use of the search function spawned comments of persons saying it would not happen at their table. If the sentiment is present on the boards, there was a possibility of running into it in one of the two groups which I game with. ![]()
Dane Pitchford wrote: Well, as far as I know, Pharasma dislikes all forms of undead, as they sort of fly in the face of everything she stands for. Now, I'm not 100% certain, at the moment, but I'm still fairly sure she doesn't like that sort of thing. Hrmmm, I do see that in her dogma now, odd that she has two domains with that spell. Still, I would like to hear a ruling on animate dead and evil spells in general being legal if the character's god and the pc's alignment do not conflict. ![]()
So here I am, being one of those nublets that brings up an old topic because its not explicitly stated one way or the other in the GtPSOP, so I am left to the mercy of a wide array of judges' personal opinions. I plan on starting a cleric of Pharasma with the Domains Death and Souls (sub-domain of repose). So the only 3rd level domain spell I will have access to is Animate Dead. The comments made here by Mr. Frost lead me to believe it is a perfectly legal spell provided my god (Pharasma) is okay with a humble mortician raising a zombie or skeleton. I understand that it is only valid for one module, but I also see persons whom are not in the position of making rulings of this nature, but whom judge modules offering their opinions on how I could not do it at "their" table. Is it possible to have this spelled out explicitly in the next GtPSOP document so I would never be held hostage by a judge whom is over zealous in his interpretation of the rules or my "new" alignment? If this has been spelled out in official pathfinder cannon else where, I humbly apologize for wasting your time. The excerpt of Mr. Frost's statement on animate dead, for those of you whom do not wish to search the entire thread.
Joshua J. Frost wrote:
![]()
James Jacobs wrote:
That is disappointing, as the chapter describing asmodeous, his church and paladins in that church in Mother of Flies added something to the game in my opinion. It clearly states that they see themselves as reformers of the church, that their orders are worded so that they would not vialate their oaths. In the organized play document it even has this passage:
If that does not say "play a paladin of Asmodeus" I am not sure what it says. This is not toward James, but the people that interjected before him.
I hope that they are allowed in org play, as I was looking forward to playing a Chelaixian Hospitaler, as asmodean healers should be in short supply. |