Runecheese30's page

Organized Play Member. 2 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 1 Organized Play character.


RSS


I agree I felt that Baalzebul was kind of silly in 3.5.


I have come to the interesting conclusion that Pathfinders lore is set before DnD 3.5, I will be using the 9 Hells of Baator for my example. I have reason to believe Pathfinder by standard lore is set before the Reckoning in Hell. For one, Baalzebul is not described as the Slug Archduke and has no mention of him being punished, Geryon rules Stygia, he was only mentioned as ruling before the reckoning before Asmodeus stripped him of his power and gave it back to Levistus. Glasya does not currently rule the sixth, Moloch does who was described by 3.5 lore as being deposed by the Hag Countess who was later disposed by Glasya (Asmodeus's daughter). Barbatos is the current ruler of Avernus, not Bel who was said to have deposed a archdevil named Zariel. What do you think?