| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
It seems Phasics is in a "you are wrong until proven right" state of mind.
Skylancer4 is explaining what is right based on the details you have given him. I'm getting the idea the was a certain instance in game where you and your GM did not agree and you want someone to simply say "you are right". I doubt that is going to happen.
Here is the original post,
"Quick question
If a creature has a natural slam attack and is also wielding a 2h sword for example, can they choose to make a slam attack without dropping the sword ?
I know you can't attack with the sword and slam in the same round but can you choose to slam attack but not attack with the sword without letting go of the sword ?"
This is very vague. The very short answer would be 'Yes.' The short answer would be 'yes, but they wouldn't be able to use the 2H sword since they are using one of their limbs to make the slam attack therefore holding the 2H weapon in one hand.'
That answer has been given to you. You then give random examples asking for a more detailed answer. Why not just give us the exact situation where this became a problem? Why give us different examples every time?
After Skylancer4 has been very patient with you you then ask for word-for-word quotes from the book. If this is what you wanted to begin with why not just consult the book yourself?
What it comes down to is you want to do something that you can't, but want direct book quotes where it tells you it can't. If you can't find rules that give a verdict for it being right or wrong then it is up to the Gm. Period. If he tells you that you can't do it looking up 1oo different rules almost telling him he's wrong it won't help anything. Just accept it and move on.