![]() ![]()
![]() i've the answer i've asked to JJ: Moroboshi wrote:
James Jacobs (Creative Director): If you wield two weapons, the weapon in your off hand adds half your Strength bonus unless you have the Double Slice feat. See the rules for light and one-handed weapons on page 141 of the Core Rulebook. ![]()
![]() Hi, i've read FAQ, but i've yet a small problem. If i wielding 2 weapon (withh or without TWF feats) do i apply my full str bonus or only half of it with the second one?
![]()
![]() Stynkk wrote:
Why? the first TWF feat don't give us nothing it only reduce penalties: Your penalties on attack rolls for fighting with two weapons are reduced. The penalty for your primary handlessens by 2 and the one for your off hand lessens by 6. if you wields two weapon you can strike with –6 –10 malus, with TWF penalties are only reduced ![]()
![]() Stynkk wrote:
I don't believe it. Here we aren't talking about TWF, but only about Off Hand STR malus and FAQ don' tell us nothing, but hey if you are a Fighter with STR 30 it make a lot of difference adding +10 or +5 to damage and hey, you make an attack eith lonsword and a mace? ok also if don't have TWF, one of this is an off hand. FAQ alway speak about Character with TWF feats ![]()
![]() James Jacobs (Creative Director):
:.... The ONLY time an attack is considered an off-hand attack is when you make an attack with a second weapon in the same round you make an attack with a first weapon. Reading this is clear to me that Off Hand STR malus is always active. You could have TWF or not, but if you strike an opponent with a second weapon in the same round you make an attack with a first weapon the second one is always off hand ![]()
![]() Grick wrote:
First of all, hi to all. In the Example the Fighter has +6+1 (2 attack). If he wields 2 weapon also if he don't have TWF feat, wath if he strike with a lomg sword (+6) and with a light mace (+1)? sure reading faq he can do it, but he can add his full strenght to the second attack? FAQ don't tell us nothing to Off Hand STR malus but is reasonable to me believe that a weapon is always primary and the other is secondary. |