Khaymon's page

I like new ideas especially the racial bonus but in the end we went with Con score + max class at 1st.
Constitution as a HP base just seams more appropriate. The hardier races will probably have higher con's than the frailer ones and who says you can't have exceptions within a race. The player may want a hardy hobbit (opps did i use that word) he can now have some control over that by giving him a higher constitution. Yup, constitution thats the ticket. (IMHO)

I love psionics but I'll make this short.

What does Psionics mean to you?
Enlightened monks, Ancient orders (Jedi), other worldly mystics (Cthulhu)
It puts me in a different mindset than playing a mage. It has a different feel and the "feel" is the main reason I'm staying with 3.5 so yes thats very important to me.

How can I get you to buy a psionics book and use it in your campaign?
I lkie this:
1) Take the existing 3.5 psionics rules.
2) Actually playtest them. In a big, open playtest if necessary*.
3) Plug up all of the infinite-this, nova-that loopholes.
4) Remove unnecessary redundancy. (Psionic item creation feats, I'm looking at you.) I also like:
"Mindblade should probably be a feat line."
But lets face it if you make I'll probably buy it and if you don't I'll use what i have (3.5).

What is an absolute deal-breaker?
Making the system like a mage variant.