![]() ![]()
Dragonchess Player wrote:
I built a monk off your post with some changes. I found a Pathfinder group here and I will play my first game on Sunday. Thanks everyone for your comments. I also have a second character ready just in case I bone up and die! LOL ![]()
Vlorax wrote:
Monk's were always Lawful! I just assumed, I never looked for an alignment requirement, it has always been! Another blow to my idea's of what is!! Dang! How much of what I think I know of Pathfinder have I assumed... I have no idea! LOL ![]()
prototype00 wrote:
wow, you know what you just told me? All (or most) of my issues are from my own (D&D) preconceived view of what a class is and what it is not. And I think you are right!! I keep reading Pathfinder info and trying to understand it from a pre-AD&D, AD&D and 5e D&D lens. I am not sure I can overcome that for awhile. As I think about it, almost everything I question is because it does not match/conform to D&D. I think you guys are going to keep getting this kind of questions/opinions from me until I can open my mind to a new world of options in the Pathfinder system. I did not think this was going to be so hard, but it is... I have got to find some PF2e players here and start playing and not just reading...that will help. ![]()
Seisho wrote: Dragon Styles Dragon Tail attack is also compatible with a Barbarians fury which (damage) benefit is halfved for agile weapons - and backswing is the next best thing How do you justify (in your mind... not to me) the mix of the barbarian losing control (rage) and the disciplined nature of a monk? A weakness/ mental issue? Which one would be the archetype? I thought about mixing these 2 classes but I cannot get past that mix in the nature of the class. The only way I would do it would be if I had the Moment of Clarity barbarian feat. This is also my issue with a monk using a tower shield, I think I could see a buckler shield but not a tower. I might try the tower shield to see if I can enjoy this style. Most of the 1st level stances do not allow use of any other attacks except the one allowed by the stance, so in most cases weapons are out. Unless I misunderstand the stances/ rules. ![]()
Vlorax wrote:
OH Dang, I have been spending so much time trying to figure out the hellknight I did not think to look in it for Monk stuff.. Great info, Thanks! ![]()
1. I can't understand why a Monk focus point pool is limited to 3. To be a Ki Monk (Unlike the other classes) a Monk has to pick heavy Ki feats. You can have a pool of 3 as early as 2nd level, however I think level 4 would be the norm. You can't regain 2 focus points until you pick Meditative Focus at level 12. So saying for most combat you will only have 1 focus point to use while Ki is your main weapon in combat. It is almost like they don't want you to be a Ki Monk, just a Monk that can once or twice a fight use Ki. But use a bunch of feats to have options. I do not understand this restriction, seems very limiting, can some one please explain? 2. The example of a Ki Monk on page 162 in the core book says you should pick occult for your spell like abilities (I say this as occult is one of the skills picked on the build). I do not understand this... is it because occult skill is used versatile in day to day play? Occult is an Int based skill while Divine is Wis based. Seems to me you need the higher stat to be wis for the saves, Ki saves, and perception. Why pick occult over divine? 3. I see no value in Mtn Stance as with the spread of your points across so many ability scores you will not stand and fight toe-to-toe... move, hit, move! It also limits you to one form of attack. Am I missing something? 4. Is a shield and/or Bracers considered Armor. I think a shield is but bracers of def would be okay to use as a monk. Am I correct? 5. General thoughts:
I do not understand how the fighter can have a better unarmed strike than a Monk. I also do not understand the slow progression of monks unarmored defense. 12 levels at your starting proficiency seems very slow for a very core ability. Thanks in advance for responses. |