
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Late to the party, although I have been following it with interest from the beginning. Put me down in master arminas' camp...+1 to basically all of his points.
While the point has already been made, this situation does bring up a question with Paizo's internal organization. Either:
1) There are two sides of the office, one that makes the product (AP's, accessories, etc.) and the other that makes the rules. Obviously, based on the stat blocks provided in the AP's and the GMG (as well as archetypes like the Zen Archer and Sohei that CLEARLY do no work with the clarification), the assumption by Paizo's own staff was that they interpreted it similarly to how arminas (and the group that I have been playing with) has. This would indicate a lack of review and or communication between the two groups.
and/or,
2) SKR gave a quick response to a long series of questions regarding the AoMF and monk attacks, and then JB sided with that interpretation to prevent his co-worker from looking bad. To his credit, JB indicated their plans to review and make a final ruling on the issue, and this shows a commitment on his part to customer service.
I will say that some of SKR's responses were somewhat troublesome. I would not expect such a tone being directed at one's customers, even in the midst of a contentious debate such as this.