
![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

And what exactly did I put in Bludd's mouth ?
Don't try, again, to derail and manipulate the subject.
This is a game with consequences for playing a psychopath, and you try to argue for having no consequences.
You don't want to play an antagonist, this is just excuses, as always.
And seriously, stop talking about compromise, that's laughable.
The main point of contention seems to be that you view it as 'consequences for being a psychopath' while others are viewing the handling of reputation (and by extension alignment) as 'consequences for non-consensual PvP' -- which they see as providing a chilling effect on certain styles of play necessary to keep to the stated goal of meaningful PvP and emergent gameplay. Consensual PvP is not the same as meaningful PvP, it's just a subset of it.