Ryan Dancey wrote:
You took away the animal companion. Right off that concerns me. Druidic animal companions are a critical balance factor and they provide tactical options that make Thinkers get excited. Removing that class feature makes me wonder why you didn't base this on a Cleric instead.
By making the "Wildshape" feature have a penalty to class level you've introduced a wrinkle that may be often overlooked. Why did you do this? Are those 2 levels meaningful?
I, too, am not sure these two criticisms are quite fair.
Ryan, are you aware that getting a domain instead of an animal companion is a core option in Pathfinder? Your phrasing makes it sound like you think this is taking away a class feature altogether, when it is merely limiting the Druid's choice as to what form her Nature Bond will take.
Are you also aware that making the Wildshape ability have a penalty to class is one of the most frequent ways Paizo has used to balance new Druid archetypes? You sound as though you are confused as to why he did this, but it has strong precedent, as it was done in over half of Paizo's existing Druid archetypes.