
Dave Meyer |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Well, as this has apparently blown up to the part where the GM and the other players have made it abundantly clear that they are not going to do anything to resolve this situation you have a few options.
#1 role up a new character. My advice would be to NOT make a cleric BTW. Pick another class you enjoy, and play that. If that results in no healer for the party, oh well. Because the GM and the other players have made it abundantly clear that they dissaprove of such characters, don't play one.
#2: Play your cleric just as you are but make it very clear that so long as that undead abomination is the property, or pet, or whatever of the ranger in question that you flat out refuse to in any way, shape, or form do anything to aid, comfort, or protect, said ranger. To use your divinely given power to do so would be a violation of the tenents of your faith that you cannot, and will not do. Ranger needs healing? Kill the abomination. Ranger needs buffs? Kill the abomination.
Same goes with those who have decided, for whatever reason, that you are somehow in the wrong for following the tenents of your faith, and have actually attacked you to protect this abomination? There is a word for those people, it is "Heretic" and they should get the same amount of help from you as they gave to you. None.
While this may cause strife, and cries of foul from the offending players, stick to your guns. Point out, repeatedly, that they knew what your characters beliefs where before this even came up, and they still decided that having a horse you don't have to feed is more important than the aid of the party cleric. So be it. It is not your decision, you do not condone it, and while you will not attack the abomination, you will certainly make it be known that there are consequences to their decisions and this is one of them.