Kolokotroni wrote:
Hi Kolokotroni: Thanks for that link. Somebody from this forums PMed me this site: Conflict RPG
@Brian: I haven't heard of Lone Wolf. I agree that a GM would be a good addition to the games if only they were sensible enough to make the game even more fun for everyone, or at least have the sense to make it logical. @I_use....: Sadly, maturity is an expensive commodity right now that no one bothers to buy. @Auxmaulous: 100% unbiased mindsets are even rarer :) I do think that we all have wish lists like perhaps getting an oracle as a GM (no biases, no revenge, no skewing). @Leifstorms: I've been hearing about Conflict on other boards, sounds like fun. But I wasn't able to find it when I googled it.
LeifStorms wrote:
I'd have some skirmishes with GMs before, actually had a lot of them, especially when they make it less fun to play the game. You mentioned that you've played some games, is it still within Pathfinder (what did you do) or some other game?
Asgetrion wrote:
i really don't get it why 4E is selling. I think it's lamer than 3.5. Maybe it's the curiosity or the loyal fan base. Pathfinder should have topped it =(
SmiloDan wrote:
Amazing additions if you ask me. I specifically like the trademark items, sure would give the class some degree of authenticity!
I have been reading about how players are lamenting the high degree of control the DMs have when it come to campaigns. I was wondering what your thoughts are when it comes to having no DMs for a game? Or perhaps limiting his control to just facilitating the game, not changing anything so that the story takes a life of its own? |